Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
newstechnologytechnewschatgptopenai
60 Indlæg 42 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • shaulaevans@zirk.usS shaulaevans@zirk.us

    @staringatclouds @stefan The human centipede of ouroboroi.

    staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    staringatclouds@mstdn.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #42

    @ShaulaEvans @stefan AI centipede maybe

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

      Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

      "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

      In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

      #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

      O This user is from outside of this forum
      O This user is from outside of this forum
      olicorne@mastodon.pirateparty.be
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #43

      @stefan
      IMHO given that those are quotes by LLM, the true issues is with the search engines (or grok's terrific SEO) and not the training process of the models.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

        Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

        "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

        In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

        https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

        #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

        wesley@defcon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wesley@defcon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wesley@defcon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #44

        @stefan a confidence-building response. "When asked for comment, a spokesperson for xAI, the owner of Grokipedia, said: 'Legacy media lies.'"

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

          Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

          "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

          In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

          https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

          #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

          gilgamesch@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gilgamesch@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gilgamesch@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #45

          @stefan Habsburg AI incoming.
          It's finally happening.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

            Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

            "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

            In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

            https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

            #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

            madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
            madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
            madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #46

            @stefan here is the thing as I see it. People has to stop seeing AI as an oracle and start seeing it as a slightly more useful search engine.

            I have a local instance of gpt-oss (20B) running on ollama, querying it through Open WebUI and doing web searches through a local SearXNG instance.

            It's absolutely fine for tuning a job application for a specific job posting. It works really well as a translator of texts from Danish to English.

            Although it warns me that it is no medical expert, it can even help sorting out symptoms without falling into Doctor Googles default diagnosis trap ("It could be deadly but if you are alive in the morning, you should see a doctor").

            Seriously, people need to get their head out of their behind and start treating this as what it is: A computer program that can help you with tedious jobs and help find answers to even somewhat difficult questions, but nothing more. It is really good at helping you with something that fits a pre-defined pattern, but it sucks at being creative.

            Oh, and yeah - don't use a public version outside of the EU, where it is under strict GDPR laws, unless you like to live dangerously. Mistral for the win.

            Seriously, the sky is NOT falling.

            luyin@lgbtqia.spaceL 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

              Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

              "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

              In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

              https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

              #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

              mls14@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
              mls14@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
              mls14@social.vivaldi.net
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #47

              @stefan It destroys the planet. It makes you dumber. It feeds your private info to tech billionaires. Nobody needs this, and anybody using it for any reason should stop immediately.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jonas175@mastodon.nuJ jonas175@mastodon.nu

                @stefan I personally use Mistral Le Chat instead of ChatGPT.

                webjo@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                webjo@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                webjo@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #48

                @jonas175 @stefan

                I trust only CatGPT. Hard facts, often painful.

                dexternemrod@troet.cafeD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                  Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

                  "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

                  In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

                  https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

                  #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

                  aurelia@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                  aurelia@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                  aurelia@social.treehouse.systems
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #49

                  @stefan this also goes for the very ethical and constitutional™ claude, by the way

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • webjo@mastodon.socialW webjo@mastodon.social

                    @jonas175 @stefan

                    I trust only CatGPT. Hard facts, often painful.

                    dexternemrod@troet.cafeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dexternemrod@troet.cafeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dexternemrod@troet.cafe
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #50

                    @webjo

                    @jonas175 @stefan

                    Well "le chat" is french for "the cat" soooo ... 😉

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                      Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

                      "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

                      In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

                      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

                      #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

                      dexternemrod@troet.cafeD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dexternemrod@troet.cafeD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dexternemrod@troet.cafe
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #51

                      @stefan
                      Did I read this correct: A llm got poisened by another llm?

                      stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                        Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

                        "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

                        In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

                        https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

                        #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

                        aburgerabz@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        aburgerabz@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        aburgerabz@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #52

                        @stefan what a surprize!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dexternemrod@troet.cafeD dexternemrod@troet.cafe

                          @stefan
                          Did I read this correct: A llm got poisened by another llm?

                          stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stefan@stefanbohacek.online
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #53

                          @dexternemrod Yep, basically.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                            Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

                            "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

                            In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

                            https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

                            #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

                            simondassow@masto.aiS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simondassow@masto.aiS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simondassow@masto.ai
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #54

                            @stefan Matching image to illustrate:

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                              Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

                              "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

                              In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

                              https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

                              #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

                              mbwelch@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mbwelch@twit.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mbwelch@twit.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #55

                              @stefan this is what made me stop using all Open AI services. https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/brockman-openai-top-trump-donor-21273419.php

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                                Not sure how many of you use ChatGTP, but you might want to scale back.

                                "The latest model of ChatGPT has begun to cite Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as a source on a wide range of queries, including on Iranian conglomerates and Holocaust deniers, raising concerns about misinformation on the platform.

                                In tests done by the Guardian, GPT-5.2 cited Grokipedia nine times in response to more than a dozen different questions."

                                https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/24/latest-chatgpt-model-uses-elon-musks-grokipedia-as-source-tests-reveal

                                #news #technology #TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #GenAI #grok #grokipedia

                                dpplggr@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dpplggr@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dpplggr@mas.to
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #56

                                @stefan yikes

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net

                                  @stefan here is the thing as I see it. People has to stop seeing AI as an oracle and start seeing it as a slightly more useful search engine.

                                  I have a local instance of gpt-oss (20B) running on ollama, querying it through Open WebUI and doing web searches through a local SearXNG instance.

                                  It's absolutely fine for tuning a job application for a specific job posting. It works really well as a translator of texts from Danish to English.

                                  Although it warns me that it is no medical expert, it can even help sorting out symptoms without falling into Doctor Googles default diagnosis trap ("It could be deadly but if you are alive in the morning, you should see a doctor").

                                  Seriously, people need to get their head out of their behind and start treating this as what it is: A computer program that can help you with tedious jobs and help find answers to even somewhat difficult questions, but nothing more. It is really good at helping you with something that fits a pre-defined pattern, but it sucks at being creative.

                                  Oh, and yeah - don't use a public version outside of the EU, where it is under strict GDPR laws, unless you like to live dangerously. Mistral for the win.

                                  Seriously, the sky is NOT falling.

                                  luyin@lgbtqia.spaceL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  luyin@lgbtqia.spaceL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  luyin@lgbtqia.space
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #57

                                  @madsenandersc @stefan most things you can do with an LLM, there are two better ways:

                                  1. Wikipedia
                                  2. Templates

                                  I admit that I, too, use machine translation, but I trust in DeepL.

                                  madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • luyin@lgbtqia.spaceL luyin@lgbtqia.space

                                    @madsenandersc @stefan most things you can do with an LLM, there are two better ways:

                                    1. Wikipedia
                                    2. Templates

                                    I admit that I, too, use machine translation, but I trust in DeepL.

                                    madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #58

                                    @luyin @stefan

                                    Last night I needed some information about a competing companys activites, and I asked my local gpt-oss to gather the information.

                                    In less than 5 minutes it had queried my local SearXNG-instance, found more than 30 relevant websites with different pieces of this information and created a list of relevant links with a brief summary of the useful content under the link for me.

                                    Could I have done this with a seach engine and my own time? - yes. Could I have done it in the same amount of time? - not even close.

                                    Wikipedia is useful if you know what you are looking for, but may only hold part of the information. Companies does not necessarily advertise their failures and economic problems. 🙂

                                    I don't understand what you mean by "templates" - could you elaborate?

                                    luyin@lgbtqia.spaceL 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net

                                      @luyin @stefan

                                      Last night I needed some information about a competing companys activites, and I asked my local gpt-oss to gather the information.

                                      In less than 5 minutes it had queried my local SearXNG-instance, found more than 30 relevant websites with different pieces of this information and created a list of relevant links with a brief summary of the useful content under the link for me.

                                      Could I have done this with a seach engine and my own time? - yes. Could I have done it in the same amount of time? - not even close.

                                      Wikipedia is useful if you know what you are looking for, but may only hold part of the information. Companies does not necessarily advertise their failures and economic problems. 🙂

                                      I don't understand what you mean by "templates" - could you elaborate?

                                      luyin@lgbtqia.spaceL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      luyin@lgbtqia.spaceL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      luyin@lgbtqia.space
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #59

                                      @madsenandersc @stefan Mail templates, cover letters etc. A starting point from which you make your own adaptations so it sounds like you.

                                      madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • luyin@lgbtqia.spaceL luyin@lgbtqia.space

                                        @madsenandersc @stefan Mail templates, cover letters etc. A starting point from which you make your own adaptations so it sounds like you.

                                        madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #60

                                        @luyin @stefan

                                        Ah - got it. I don't use AI for mails, so that is why I did not make the connection in my head. 🙂

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Svar
                                        • Svar som emne
                                        Login for at svare
                                        • Ældste til nyeste
                                        • Nyeste til ældste
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Log ind

                                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Hjem
                                        • Seneste
                                        • Etiketter
                                        • Populære
                                        • Verden
                                        • Bruger
                                        • Grupper