Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
21 Indlæg 16 Posters 45 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

    2/

    ... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.

    https://www.newsweek.com/jess-edwards-teen-child-marriage-opposed-republican-ripe-fertile-age-1897512

    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/republican-lawmakers-child-marriage-abortion-1235018777/

    https://www.jezebel.com/several-mississippi-republicans-are-blocking-child-marriage-ban-introd-by-a-child-marriage-survivor

    They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.

    They fund efforts at male supremacy

    npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    npars01@mstdn.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #11

    3/

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2026/02/03/exclusive-charles-and-chase-koch-discuss-their-first-book-together/

    https://thefulcrum.us/inclusion-diversity/project-2025-affirmative-action

    https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

    https://msmagazine.com/2023/02/06/fda-abortion-pills/

    Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
    https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

    https://www.businessinsider.com/koch-funded-group-backing-nonpartisan-campaign-before-america-250-2025-12

    https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

    https://msmagazine.com/2023/04/11/anti-abortion-groups-era-equal-rights-amendment/

    https://truthout.org/articles/dark-money-womens-groups-are-using-anti-trans-scaremongering-to-oppose-era/

    https://msmagazine.com/2024/02/08/project-2025-conservative-right-wing-trump-woke/

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/07/koch-family-stand-together-music

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/how-four-aging-billionaires-are-making-sure-their-money-doesnt-go-to-uncle-sam/

    https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2025/09/02/koch-backed-group-launches-permitting-push-00536571

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2025/07/17/bill-gates-charles-koch-and-three-other-billionaires-are-giving-1-billion-to-enhance-economic-mobility-in-the-us/

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/27/project-2025-dismantle-us-climate-policy-next-republican-president

    npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

      3/

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2026/02/03/exclusive-charles-and-chase-koch-discuss-their-first-book-together/

      https://thefulcrum.us/inclusion-diversity/project-2025-affirmative-action

      https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

      https://msmagazine.com/2023/02/06/fda-abortion-pills/

      Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
      https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

      https://www.businessinsider.com/koch-funded-group-backing-nonpartisan-campaign-before-america-250-2025-12

      https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

      https://msmagazine.com/2023/04/11/anti-abortion-groups-era-equal-rights-amendment/

      https://truthout.org/articles/dark-money-womens-groups-are-using-anti-trans-scaremongering-to-oppose-era/

      https://msmagazine.com/2024/02/08/project-2025-conservative-right-wing-trump-woke/

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/07/koch-family-stand-together-music

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/how-four-aging-billionaires-are-making-sure-their-money-doesnt-go-to-uncle-sam/

      https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2025/09/02/koch-backed-group-launches-permitting-push-00536571

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2025/07/17/bill-gates-charles-koch-and-three-other-billionaires-are-giving-1-billion-to-enhance-economic-mobility-in-the-us/

      https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/27/project-2025-dismantle-us-climate-policy-next-republican-president

      npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      npars01@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #12

      4/

      https://progressive.org/magazine/billionaire-kingmaker-still-dividing-the-nation-maclean-graves/

      https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/morrison-v-olson-and-the-triumph-of-the-unitary-executive-theory/

      https://www.citizen.org/news/koch/

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/26/charles-koch-us-government-rightwing-supreme-court

      https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/05/donald-trump-unitary-executive-theory/

      https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

      https://www.hnn.us/article/despite-aggressive-rebrand-charles-koch-is-still-f

      The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
      https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/exclusive-charles-koch-koch-industries-has-given-more-than-5-billion-of-his-koch-industries-stock-to-two-nonprofits/

      https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

      https://kansasreflector.com/2024/08/26/project-2025-would-pillage-our-rights-and-institutions-kansans-want-to-fight-back/

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/billionaire-charles-koch-shares-his-secret-plan-to-pass-on-his-fortune-and-influence/

      npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

        4/

        https://progressive.org/magazine/billionaire-kingmaker-still-dividing-the-nation-maclean-graves/

        https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/morrison-v-olson-and-the-triumph-of-the-unitary-executive-theory/

        https://www.citizen.org/news/koch/

        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/26/charles-koch-us-government-rightwing-supreme-court

        https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/05/donald-trump-unitary-executive-theory/

        https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

        https://www.hnn.us/article/despite-aggressive-rebrand-charles-koch-is-still-f

        The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
        https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

        https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/exclusive-charles-koch-koch-industries-has-given-more-than-5-billion-of-his-koch-industries-stock-to-two-nonprofits/

        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

        https://kansasreflector.com/2024/08/26/project-2025-would-pillage-our-rights-and-institutions-kansans-want-to-fight-back/

        https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/billionaire-charles-koch-shares-his-secret-plan-to-pass-on-his-fortune-and-influence/

        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        npars01@mstdn.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #13

        5/

        https://legal-planet.org/2026/01/30/does-the-unitary-executive-theory-exist-not-really/

        Bradley, Koch, Coors, Scaife Mellon, Seid, Uihlein fund public corruption, coup attempts, political 'divide & conquer', and efforts at a White Supremacist Constitution.

        https://www.desmog.com/2024/08/14/project-2025-billionaire-donor-heritage-foundation-donald-trump-jd-vance-charles-koch-peter-coors/

        People who spent their lives polluting the planet now spend billions on polluting knowledge & information to thwart free & fair elections using AI.
        https://www.desmog.com/2025/12/11/the-koch-network-is-pushing-trump-to-accelerate-ai-documents-show/

        https://washingtonspectator.org/project-2025-the-latest-plot-against-america/

        https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/25/climate-science-deniers-downplaying-coronavirus-pandemic

        https://www.desmog.com/2017/01/12/trump-kingmaker-billionaires-robert-rebekah-mercer-pouring-millions-climate-science-denial/

        https://www.texasobserver.org/dysfunctional-government-rfk-trump-v-slaughter/

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ridogi@mastodon.socialR ridogi@mastodon.social

          @zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.

          2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/

          2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/

          zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zakalwe@plasmatrap.com
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #14

          @ridogi@mastodon.social @amydiehl@mstdn.social Thanks for the information! I was a little skeptical about the claim myself but wasn't sure where to look for evidence for or against.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

            SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
            https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

            emmaf_77@piaille.frE This user is from outside of this forum
            emmaf_77@piaille.frE This user is from outside of this forum
            emmaf_77@piaille.fr
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #15

            @amydiehl #patriarchy

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • alexr@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
              alexr@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
              alexr@mastodon.online
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #16

              @anne_twain @amydiehl Not Americans but rather anti-American Republicans.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                kanamauna@sauropods.winK This user is from outside of this forum
                kanamauna@sauropods.winK This user is from outside of this forum
                kanamauna@sauropods.win
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #17

                @amydiehl

                For a bunch of fragile patriarchs who are afraid of the world not conforming to their every beliefs, that is one wild way to end the name change tradition.

                BTW, did it not occur to them that women could change BACK to their maiden names?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                  SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                  https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                  edelruth@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                  edelruth@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                  edelruth@mastodon.online
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #18

                  @amydiehl

                  This Should end the name change on marriage cultural practice, and yay! to that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                    dialectician@universeodon.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dialectician@universeodon.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dialectician@universeodon.com
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #19

                    @amydiehl Catholic women keep their name, so it will liberate Protestant woman from the misogyny of male marriage contracts? All the Catholics have to do is recognise that sexism; gender inequality has no place in the 21c; love not war for chauvinism, racism, sexism and ableism is a greater commandment than injustice; inequality of the law favouring paedophilia and rape? #TheVote #DemocraticRights #DiverseInterests #Freedom

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                      SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                      https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                      firlefanz@writing.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                      firlefanz@writing.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                      firlefanz@writing.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #20

                      @amydiehl

                      Another way of skewing elections to the right.

                      Republicans have always hated that women predominately vote more left and in favor of families, communities and mutual benefits.

                      This is an easy way to cut them off - until women get away and change their names back to their maiden names en masse.

                      But if I am frank, you'll be lucky if there even are elections in the future of the rogue US. Trump will do his best to ensure a win, and if that's not possible, he'll cut elections.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                        SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                        https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                        musiquenow@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                        musiquenow@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                        musiquenow@todon.eu
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #21

                        @amydiehl

                        🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨#ALERT

                        #votersuppression #USElections #TransAndNonBinaryrRightsAreHumanRights

                        #womansrights #ElectionStealing #SAVEAct

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper