Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
21 Indlæg 16 Posters 45 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

    contrasocial@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    contrasocial@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    contrasocial@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #3

    @amydiehl

    Look out! Chuck Schumer is gonna tell the GOP not to do that and then lean back and hope they don't do it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

      SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
      https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

      nanowiz@vmst.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
      nanowiz@vmst.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
      nanowiz@vmst.io
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #4

      @amydiehl

      jumpin up and down about this since it passed the House.
      I call my Senators to say I want to hear them sounding off

      #crickets

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ zakalwe@plasmatrap.com

        @amydiehl@mstdn.social That could backfire on them. I saw it asserted a day or two ago that without white women voting disproportionately conservative, no conservative would have won election in the last century.

        I don't know how
        true the assertion is.

        [UPDATE (see below): Looks like it's not.]

        ridogi@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        ridogi@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        ridogi@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #5

        @zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.

        2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/

        2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/

        zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

          SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
          https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          npars01@mstdn.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #6

          @amydiehl

          It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

          The fossil fuel industry.

          Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

          All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

          Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
          https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

          https://rewirenewsgroup.com/2013/11/05/anatomy-of-the-war-on-women-how-the-koch-brothers-are-funding-the-anti-choice-agenda/

          https://msmagazine.com/2022/05/06/childcare-koch-women-independent-womens-forum/

          Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

          1/

          libramoon@mastodon.socialL npars01@mstdn.socialN 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

            @amydiehl

            It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

            The fossil fuel industry.

            Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

            All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

            Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
            https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

            https://rewirenewsgroup.com/2013/11/05/anatomy-of-the-war-on-women-how-the-koch-brothers-are-funding-the-anti-choice-agenda/

            https://msmagazine.com/2022/05/06/childcare-koch-women-independent-womens-forum/

            Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

            1/

            libramoon@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            libramoon@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            libramoon@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #7

            @Npars01 @amydiehl

            observe the amazing power of women that these so-called powerful men so greatly fear

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

              SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
              https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

              megatronicthronbanks@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              megatronicthronbanks@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              megatronicthronbanks@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #8

              @amydiehl

              yeah first thing the Backlash administration has to do is re-enfranchise all US voters

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                @amydiehl

                It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

                The fossil fuel industry.

                Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

                All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

                Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
                https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

                https://rewirenewsgroup.com/2013/11/05/anatomy-of-the-war-on-women-how-the-koch-brothers-are-funding-the-anti-choice-agenda/

                https://msmagazine.com/2022/05/06/childcare-koch-women-independent-womens-forum/

                Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

                1/

                npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                npars01@mstdn.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #9

                2/

                ... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.

                https://www.newsweek.com/jess-edwards-teen-child-marriage-opposed-republican-ripe-fertile-age-1897512

                https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/republican-lawmakers-child-marriage-abortion-1235018777/

                https://www.jezebel.com/several-mississippi-republicans-are-blocking-child-marriage-ban-introd-by-a-child-marriage-survivor

                They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.

                They fund efforts at male supremacy

                npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                  SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                  https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                  croyle@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  croyle@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  croyle@wandering.shop
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #10

                  @amydiehl More absolute ratf*ckery.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                    2/

                    ... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.

                    https://www.newsweek.com/jess-edwards-teen-child-marriage-opposed-republican-ripe-fertile-age-1897512

                    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/republican-lawmakers-child-marriage-abortion-1235018777/

                    https://www.jezebel.com/several-mississippi-republicans-are-blocking-child-marriage-ban-introd-by-a-child-marriage-survivor

                    They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.

                    They fund efforts at male supremacy

                    npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    npars01@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #11

                    3/

                    https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2026/02/03/exclusive-charles-and-chase-koch-discuss-their-first-book-together/

                    https://thefulcrum.us/inclusion-diversity/project-2025-affirmative-action

                    https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

                    https://msmagazine.com/2023/02/06/fda-abortion-pills/

                    Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
                    https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

                    https://www.businessinsider.com/koch-funded-group-backing-nonpartisan-campaign-before-america-250-2025-12

                    https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

                    https://msmagazine.com/2023/04/11/anti-abortion-groups-era-equal-rights-amendment/

                    https://truthout.org/articles/dark-money-womens-groups-are-using-anti-trans-scaremongering-to-oppose-era/

                    https://msmagazine.com/2024/02/08/project-2025-conservative-right-wing-trump-woke/

                    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/07/koch-family-stand-together-music

                    https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/how-four-aging-billionaires-are-making-sure-their-money-doesnt-go-to-uncle-sam/

                    https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2025/09/02/koch-backed-group-launches-permitting-push-00536571

                    https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2025/07/17/bill-gates-charles-koch-and-three-other-billionaires-are-giving-1-billion-to-enhance-economic-mobility-in-the-us/

                    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/27/project-2025-dismantle-us-climate-policy-next-republican-president

                    npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                      3/

                      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2026/02/03/exclusive-charles-and-chase-koch-discuss-their-first-book-together/

                      https://thefulcrum.us/inclusion-diversity/project-2025-affirmative-action

                      https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

                      https://msmagazine.com/2023/02/06/fda-abortion-pills/

                      Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
                      https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

                      https://www.businessinsider.com/koch-funded-group-backing-nonpartisan-campaign-before-america-250-2025-12

                      https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

                      https://msmagazine.com/2023/04/11/anti-abortion-groups-era-equal-rights-amendment/

                      https://truthout.org/articles/dark-money-womens-groups-are-using-anti-trans-scaremongering-to-oppose-era/

                      https://msmagazine.com/2024/02/08/project-2025-conservative-right-wing-trump-woke/

                      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/07/koch-family-stand-together-music

                      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/how-four-aging-billionaires-are-making-sure-their-money-doesnt-go-to-uncle-sam/

                      https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2025/09/02/koch-backed-group-launches-permitting-push-00536571

                      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2025/07/17/bill-gates-charles-koch-and-three-other-billionaires-are-giving-1-billion-to-enhance-economic-mobility-in-the-us/

                      https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/27/project-2025-dismantle-us-climate-policy-next-republican-president

                      npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      npars01@mstdn.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #12

                      4/

                      https://progressive.org/magazine/billionaire-kingmaker-still-dividing-the-nation-maclean-graves/

                      https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/morrison-v-olson-and-the-triumph-of-the-unitary-executive-theory/

                      https://www.citizen.org/news/koch/

                      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/26/charles-koch-us-government-rightwing-supreme-court

                      https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/05/donald-trump-unitary-executive-theory/

                      https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

                      https://www.hnn.us/article/despite-aggressive-rebrand-charles-koch-is-still-f

                      The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
                      https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

                      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/exclusive-charles-koch-koch-industries-has-given-more-than-5-billion-of-his-koch-industries-stock-to-two-nonprofits/

                      https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

                      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

                      https://kansasreflector.com/2024/08/26/project-2025-would-pillage-our-rights-and-institutions-kansans-want-to-fight-back/

                      https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/billionaire-charles-koch-shares-his-secret-plan-to-pass-on-his-fortune-and-influence/

                      npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                        4/

                        https://progressive.org/magazine/billionaire-kingmaker-still-dividing-the-nation-maclean-graves/

                        https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/morrison-v-olson-and-the-triumph-of-the-unitary-executive-theory/

                        https://www.citizen.org/news/koch/

                        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/26/charles-koch-us-government-rightwing-supreme-court

                        https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/05/donald-trump-unitary-executive-theory/

                        https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

                        https://www.hnn.us/article/despite-aggressive-rebrand-charles-koch-is-still-f

                        The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
                        https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

                        https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/exclusive-charles-koch-koch-industries-has-given-more-than-5-billion-of-his-koch-industries-stock-to-two-nonprofits/

                        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

                        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

                        https://kansasreflector.com/2024/08/26/project-2025-would-pillage-our-rights-and-institutions-kansans-want-to-fight-back/

                        https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2023/10/10/billionaire-charles-koch-shares-his-secret-plan-to-pass-on-his-fortune-and-influence/

                        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        npars01@mstdn.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #13

                        5/

                        https://legal-planet.org/2026/01/30/does-the-unitary-executive-theory-exist-not-really/

                        Bradley, Koch, Coors, Scaife Mellon, Seid, Uihlein fund public corruption, coup attempts, political 'divide & conquer', and efforts at a White Supremacist Constitution.

                        https://www.desmog.com/2024/08/14/project-2025-billionaire-donor-heritage-foundation-donald-trump-jd-vance-charles-koch-peter-coors/

                        People who spent their lives polluting the planet now spend billions on polluting knowledge & information to thwart free & fair elections using AI.
                        https://www.desmog.com/2025/12/11/the-koch-network-is-pushing-trump-to-accelerate-ai-documents-show/

                        https://washingtonspectator.org/project-2025-the-latest-plot-against-america/

                        https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/25/climate-science-deniers-downplaying-coronavirus-pandemic

                        https://www.desmog.com/2017/01/12/trump-kingmaker-billionaires-robert-rebekah-mercer-pouring-millions-climate-science-denial/

                        https://www.texasobserver.org/dysfunctional-government-rfk-trump-v-slaughter/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ridogi@mastodon.socialR ridogi@mastodon.social

                          @zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.

                          2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/

                          2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/

                          zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          zakalwe@plasmatrap.com
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #14

                          @ridogi@mastodon.social @amydiehl@mstdn.social Thanks for the information! I was a little skeptical about the claim myself but wasn't sure where to look for evidence for or against.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                            SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                            https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                            emmaf_77@piaille.frE This user is from outside of this forum
                            emmaf_77@piaille.frE This user is from outside of this forum
                            emmaf_77@piaille.fr
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #15

                            @amydiehl #patriarchy

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • alexr@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                              alexr@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                              alexr@mastodon.online
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #16

                              @anne_twain @amydiehl Not Americans but rather anti-American Republicans.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                                SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                kanamauna@sauropods.winK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kanamauna@sauropods.winK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kanamauna@sauropods.win
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #17

                                @amydiehl

                                For a bunch of fragile patriarchs who are afraid of the world not conforming to their every beliefs, that is one wild way to end the name change tradition.

                                BTW, did it not occur to them that women could change BACK to their maiden names?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                                  SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                  https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                  edelruth@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  edelruth@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  edelruth@mastodon.online
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #18

                                  @amydiehl

                                  This Should end the name change on marriage cultural practice, and yay! to that.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                                    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                    dialectician@universeodon.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dialectician@universeodon.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dialectician@universeodon.com
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #19

                                    @amydiehl Catholic women keep their name, so it will liberate Protestant woman from the misogyny of male marriage contracts? All the Catholics have to do is recognise that sexism; gender inequality has no place in the 21c; love not war for chauvinism, racism, sexism and ableism is a greater commandment than injustice; inequality of the law favouring paedophilia and rape? #TheVote #DemocraticRights #DiverseInterests #Freedom

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                                      SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                      https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                      firlefanz@writing.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      firlefanz@writing.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      firlefanz@writing.exchange
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #20

                                      @amydiehl

                                      Another way of skewing elections to the right.

                                      Republicans have always hated that women predominately vote more left and in favor of families, communities and mutual benefits.

                                      This is an easy way to cut them off - until women get away and change their names back to their maiden names en masse.

                                      But if I am frank, you'll be lucky if there even are elections in the future of the rogue US. Trump will do his best to ensure a win, and if that's not possible, he'll cut elections.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • amydiehl@mstdn.socialA amydiehl@mstdn.social

                                        SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                        https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                        musiquenow@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        musiquenow@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        musiquenow@todon.eu
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #21

                                        @amydiehl

                                        🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨#ALERT

                                        #votersuppression #USElections #TransAndNonBinaryrRightsAreHumanRights

                                        #womansrights #ElectionStealing #SAVEAct

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                        Svar
                                        • Svar som emne
                                        Login for at svare
                                        • Ældste til nyeste
                                        • Nyeste til ældste
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Log ind

                                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Hjem
                                        • Seneste
                                        • Etiketter
                                        • Populære
                                        • Verden
                                        • Bruger
                                        • Grupper