Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
humanitiesstemeducationcriticalthinkinethics
60 Indlæg 40 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange

    @thepurpleoctopus

    stems without roots, leaves or flowers don't last long. same for STEM.

    tanyakaroli@expressional.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tanyakaroli@expressional.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tanyakaroli@expressional.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #36

    @paul_ipv6 beautifully put!
    @thepurpleoctopus

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

      @Colman I'm not from the anglosphere, but we called it just "natural sciences". The local term for STEM then was MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften und Technik).

      I usually still use the term Naturwissenschaften (natural sciences) in regular speech, but it doesn't translate that well to English directly. 🙂

      That said, I do agree with you, and I would use a different term than STEM if I did not mean to highlight everything that came with the term. 🙂

      geofcox@climatejustice.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      geofcox@climatejustice.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      geofcox@climatejustice.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #37

      @thepurpleoctopus @Colman

      I'm interested in the differences between the anglosphere and other cultures on this - I'm from the UK but live in France, and my English/French daughter studied chemistry in the French grande école system - and received a much broader general education than she would have done in the UK - including at least 2 foreign languages throughout her 5 years higher education in chemistry, along with philosophy and the arts.

      There is in the UK constant criticism of the too-early over-specialisation in UK schools and universities, and attempts to introduce a French-style 'bac', which even for science specialists includes languages, philosophy, literature, etc...

      I'm not saying there's no 'two cultures' problem at all outside the anglosphere - but I tend to think it is particularly acute there.

      woo@fosstodon.orgW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

        Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

        This isn't a criticism of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics. We need them. Desperately. They should be well supported.

        But we also need philosophy, history, literature, languages, ethics, the arts, and every discipline that wrestles with what it means to be human. We need people who can understand the human condition, recognise propaganda, interpret context, think critically about power, engage with complexity, and ask not only how the world works, but what kind of world we ought to build.

        A society built only to solve technical problems eventually forgets how to solve human ones.

        #Humanities #STEM #Education #CriticalThinking #Ethics #Democracy #Society

        drsuzanne@ohai.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        drsuzanne@ohai.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        drsuzanne@ohai.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #38

        @thepurpleoctopus soooo the humanities are not the same as the social sciences. Both of which we need.

        thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

          Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

          This isn't a criticism of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics. We need them. Desperately. They should be well supported.

          But we also need philosophy, history, literature, languages, ethics, the arts, and every discipline that wrestles with what it means to be human. We need people who can understand the human condition, recognise propaganda, interpret context, think critically about power, engage with complexity, and ask not only how the world works, but what kind of world we ought to build.

          A society built only to solve technical problems eventually forgets how to solve human ones.

          #Humanities #STEM #Education #CriticalThinking #Ethics #Democracy #Society

          shuro@friends.deko.cloudS This user is from outside of this forum
          shuro@friends.deko.cloudS This user is from outside of this forum
          shuro@friends.deko.cloud
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #39

          @thepurpleoctopus the only tricky part here is who is going to teach these humanities.

          STEM is neutral however these disciplines can be heavily biased and justify basically anything. E.g. USSR had no shortage of philosophy taught. It was just very specific kind of philosophy.

          petez@mk.phreedom.clubP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • shuro@friends.deko.cloudS shuro@friends.deko.cloud

            @thepurpleoctopus the only tricky part here is who is going to teach these humanities.

            STEM is neutral however these disciplines can be heavily biased and justify basically anything. E.g. USSR had no shortage of philosophy taught. It was just very specific kind of philosophy.

            petez@mk.phreedom.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
            petez@mk.phreedom.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
            petez@mk.phreedom.club
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #40

            @shuro@friends.deko.cloud @thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space there is a number of smart and meanfull people working on philosophy. There a lot were. But usually they are not easy to unterstand and tgey not always told what you like to hear.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

              Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

              This isn't a criticism of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics. We need them. Desperately. They should be well supported.

              But we also need philosophy, history, literature, languages, ethics, the arts, and every discipline that wrestles with what it means to be human. We need people who can understand the human condition, recognise propaganda, interpret context, think critically about power, engage with complexity, and ask not only how the world works, but what kind of world we ought to build.

              A society built only to solve technical problems eventually forgets how to solve human ones.

              #Humanities #STEM #Education #CriticalThinking #Ethics #Democracy #Society

              reggiehere@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              reggiehere@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              reggiehere@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #41

              @thepurpleoctopus

              Agree completely, although it's probably worth noting that STEM subjects have also been focused on applied science and engineering subjects most likely to offer an economic return.

              thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

                Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

                This isn't a criticism of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics. We need them. Desperately. They should be well supported.

                But we also need philosophy, history, literature, languages, ethics, the arts, and every discipline that wrestles with what it means to be human. We need people who can understand the human condition, recognise propaganda, interpret context, think critically about power, engage with complexity, and ask not only how the world works, but what kind of world we ought to build.

                A society built only to solve technical problems eventually forgets how to solve human ones.

                #Humanities #STEM #Education #CriticalThinking #Ethics #Democracy #Society

                baltakatei@twit.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                baltakatei@twit.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                baltakatei@twit.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #42

                @thepurpleoctopus again, I am reminded of a moment in Small Gods (1992) by Terry Pratchett in which an engineer and a philosopher argue on which books to save from a vast library about to be destroyed by religious zealouts: Some books teach people how to live better while some books teach people how to *be* people. #discworld

                frantasaur@mastodon.ieF juliette@mastodon.greenJ 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

                  Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

                  This isn't a criticism of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics. We need them. Desperately. They should be well supported.

                  But we also need philosophy, history, literature, languages, ethics, the arts, and every discipline that wrestles with what it means to be human. We need people who can understand the human condition, recognise propaganda, interpret context, think critically about power, engage with complexity, and ask not only how the world works, but what kind of world we ought to build.

                  A society built only to solve technical problems eventually forgets how to solve human ones.

                  #Humanities #STEM #Education #CriticalThinking #Ethics #Democracy #Society

                  frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                  frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                  frantasaur@mastodon.ie
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #43

                  @thepurpleoctopus I work in tech, and I 100% agree that we need to challenge the assumption that humanities are somehow not “useful”. The seems to have increasingly crept into public discourse from the far right. An educated person should be broadly well read, including science, tech, arts and humanities, and we need people specializing in all these domains.

                  energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • baltakatei@twit.socialB baltakatei@twit.social

                    @thepurpleoctopus again, I am reminded of a moment in Small Gods (1992) by Terry Pratchett in which an engineer and a philosopher argue on which books to save from a vast library about to be destroyed by religious zealouts: Some books teach people how to live better while some books teach people how to *be* people. #discworld

                    frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                    frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                    frantasaur@mastodon.ie
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #44

                    @baltakatei @thepurpleoctopus as usual, the late, great Terry Pratchett has nailed it!

                    frantasaur@mastodon.ieF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • frantasaur@mastodon.ieF frantasaur@mastodon.ie

                      @baltakatei @thepurpleoctopus as usual, the late, great Terry Pratchett has nailed it!

                      frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                      frantasaur@mastodon.ieF This user is from outside of this forum
                      frantasaur@mastodon.ie
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #45

                      @baltakatei @thepurpleoctopus His novels should be required reading in schools, particularly this one.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • baltakatei@twit.socialB baltakatei@twit.social

                        @thepurpleoctopus again, I am reminded of a moment in Small Gods (1992) by Terry Pratchett in which an engineer and a philosopher argue on which books to save from a vast library about to be destroyed by religious zealouts: Some books teach people how to live better while some books teach people how to *be* people. #discworld

                        juliette@mastodon.greenJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        juliette@mastodon.greenJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        juliette@mastodon.green
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #46

                        @baltakatei @thepurpleoctopus I just finished the audiobook of this one! Another great parallel conversation between Urn and Didactylos is the one later in the book about the arms race.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • reggiehere@mastodon.socialR reggiehere@mastodon.social

                          @thepurpleoctopus

                          Agree completely, although it's probably worth noting that STEM subjects have also been focused on applied science and engineering subjects most likely to offer an economic return.

                          thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                          thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                          thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #47

                          @ReggieHere Yes, very true. Thank you! 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • drsuzanne@ohai.socialD drsuzanne@ohai.social

                            @thepurpleoctopus soooo the humanities are not the same as the social sciences. Both of which we need.

                            thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #48

                            @DrSuzanne Very correct, and I feel I should have included this, to be honest. However, when I wrote this, I mostly thought of philosophy and ethics, so I hope my oversight can be forgiven.

                            I will also say that where I worked academically, even the social sciences were looking down on the arts and humanities. And on the other side, in German speaking academia, social sciences and the humanities are often seen as almost the same.

                            But yes, you're definitely right.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • frantasaur@mastodon.ieF frantasaur@mastodon.ie

                              @thepurpleoctopus I work in tech, and I 100% agree that we need to challenge the assumption that humanities are somehow not “useful”. The seems to have increasingly crept into public discourse from the far right. An educated person should be broadly well read, including science, tech, arts and humanities, and we need people specializing in all these domains.

                              energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                              energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                              energisch_@troet.cafe
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #49

                              @Frantasaur @thepurpleoctopus humanities also means communication, not the technical side, but the wording, the influence, the way we communicate difficult and complex subjects. And it looks like there is great need of it. What we receive is mostly advertising and not information any longer.

                              thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT frantasaur@mastodon.ieF 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

                                Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

                                This isn't a criticism of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics. We need them. Desperately. They should be well supported.

                                But we also need philosophy, history, literature, languages, ethics, the arts, and every discipline that wrestles with what it means to be human. We need people who can understand the human condition, recognise propaganda, interpret context, think critically about power, engage with complexity, and ask not only how the world works, but what kind of world we ought to build.

                                A society built only to solve technical problems eventually forgets how to solve human ones.

                                #Humanities #STEM #Education #CriticalThinking #Ethics #Democracy #Society

                                blazr@chaos.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                blazr@chaos.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                blazr@chaos.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #50

                                @thepurpleoctopus the Bachelor/Master system that replaced the german 'Diplom' was a major step towards less broad education imho. the word 'University' comes from a universal (aka broad) education. the Bachelor/Master system kill a huge amount of this broadness by streamlining universities towards utilitarism/usefulness for the industry.

                                we clearly lack a period of full blown social innovation in e.g. the fields of community health, financial health, forms of living, isolation issues ...

                                thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • energisch_@troet.cafeE energisch_@troet.cafe

                                  @Frantasaur @thepurpleoctopus humanities also means communication, not the technical side, but the wording, the influence, the way we communicate difficult and complex subjects. And it looks like there is great need of it. What we receive is mostly advertising and not information any longer.

                                  thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #51

                                  @energisch_ @Frantasaur As someone who studied communication science with a passion, yes, I wholeheartedly agree. 🙂

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • blazr@chaos.socialB blazr@chaos.social

                                    @thepurpleoctopus the Bachelor/Master system that replaced the german 'Diplom' was a major step towards less broad education imho. the word 'University' comes from a universal (aka broad) education. the Bachelor/Master system kill a huge amount of this broadness by streamlining universities towards utilitarism/usefulness for the industry.

                                    we clearly lack a period of full blown social innovation in e.g. the fields of community health, financial health, forms of living, isolation issues ...

                                    thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #52

                                    @blazr short answer: yes. Exactly. 🙂

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • geofcox@climatejustice.socialG geofcox@climatejustice.social

                                      @thepurpleoctopus @Colman

                                      I'm interested in the differences between the anglosphere and other cultures on this - I'm from the UK but live in France, and my English/French daughter studied chemistry in the French grande école system - and received a much broader general education than she would have done in the UK - including at least 2 foreign languages throughout her 5 years higher education in chemistry, along with philosophy and the arts.

                                      There is in the UK constant criticism of the too-early over-specialisation in UK schools and universities, and attempts to introduce a French-style 'bac', which even for science specialists includes languages, philosophy, literature, etc...

                                      I'm not saying there's no 'two cultures' problem at all outside the anglosphere - but I tend to think it is particularly acute there.

                                      woo@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      woo@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      woo@fosstodon.org
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #53

                                      @GeofCox @thepurpleoctopus @Colman Are you sure it's the British system that's broken, not some schools? My daughter attended a state school, studied German, Japanese and Latin to GCSE and has A Levels in Art, Design & Technology, Maths and Physics.

                                      I'm terrible at languages. I can't learn vocabulary (possibly undiagnosed ADHD), so I'd have hated being forced to continue to fail.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

                                        Society is starting to look exactly like what happens when we spend decades treating STEM as the only path worth investing in, while sidelining the humanities.

                                        This isn't a criticism of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics. We need them. Desperately. They should be well supported.

                                        But we also need philosophy, history, literature, languages, ethics, the arts, and every discipline that wrestles with what it means to be human. We need people who can understand the human condition, recognise propaganda, interpret context, think critically about power, engage with complexity, and ask not only how the world works, but what kind of world we ought to build.

                                        A society built only to solve technical problems eventually forgets how to solve human ones.

                                        #Humanities #STEM #Education #CriticalThinking #Ethics #Democracy #Society

                                        davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davecb@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #54

                                        @thepurpleoctopus I studied philosophy in university,and was hired into Sun Microsystems as such. They needed someone with a deep background, to work between one of the founders and the stem-only programmers. And, to be fair, as a logician.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.space

                                          @Colman I'm not from the anglosphere, but we called it just "natural sciences". The local term for STEM then was MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften und Technik).

                                          I usually still use the term Naturwissenschaften (natural sciences) in regular speech, but it doesn't translate that well to English directly. 🙂

                                          That said, I do agree with you, and I would use a different term than STEM if I did not mean to highlight everything that came with the term. 🙂

                                          davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davecb@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davecb@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #55

                                          @thepurpleoctopus @Colman With tongue just slightly in cheek, I talk about the sciences as "natural philosophy"

                                          thepurpleoctopus@lgbtqia.spaceT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper