Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Can you imagine Mastodon raising 100 MILLION dollars from a crypto VC fund and failing to disclose it... for a full year?

Can you imagine Mastodon raising 100 MILLION dollars from a crypto VC fund and failing to disclose it... for a full year?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
bluesky
64 Indlæg 37 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

    @mariusor

    Right, I didn't say all of it, so I don't disagree. But we can definitely fix all the major issues people have with the fediverse in some way.

    @_elena @benroyce @mat

    javascript@app.wafrn.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    javascript@app.wafrn.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    javascript@app.wafrn.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #51

    yeah actually the concept of DID as decentralized identifiers can have its equivalent in the Portable Objects Proposal described here: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/ef61/fep-ef61.md

    This is just more complex to do in an ecosystem like the fediverse where implementations are (and have been for a long time) less standarized

    mariusor@metalhead.clubM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu

      @_elena @patpro Indeed, but do we need a European SlopHub if @Codeberg already exists?

      otfrom@functional.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
      otfrom@functional.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
      otfrom@functional.cafe
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #52

      @ainmosni @_elena @patpro @Codeberg we do need something like 50 to 500 codebergs

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @mariusor @stefan @_elena @mat

        mastodon was playing around with DIDs at some point

        you can find references to it in the documentation (deprecated now for a long time)

        example:

        https://docs.joinmastodon.org/entities/IdentityProof/

        not sure why they abandoned it

        maybe because DID just isn't there yet

        mariusor@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
        mariusor@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
        mariusor@metalhead.club
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #53

        @benroyce I wasn't speaking of Mastodon because they barely do any effort into being a spec compliant ActivityPub service...

        @stefan @_elena @mat

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mariusor@metalhead.clubM mariusor@metalhead.club

          @benroyce I wasn't speaking of Mastodon because they barely do any effort into being a spec compliant ActivityPub service...

          @stefan @_elena @mat

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #54

          @mariusor @stefan @_elena @mat

          not in an effort to start a fight but just divulging my honest views on the topic:

          so fucking what

          just build shit

          the spec can follow behind later

          waiting for perfect spec structuring before doing anything is an exercise in inertia

          mariusor@metalhead.clubM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

            Mike Masnick, who sits on the board of #Bluesky, claims the team was too busy to announce the series B funding (see screenshot).

            But something is fishy.

            Even the VC firm - Bain Capital Crypto - isn't listing Bluesky anywhere on their website: https://baincapitalcrypto.com/portfolio/

            Why the mystery? Was Bluesky afraid of a public backlash & asked to keep the information under wraps?

            Sorry if I keep repeating myself but I will forever be skeptical of Bluesky and think of the tale of the scorpion and the frog.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            amoshias@esq.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #55

            @_elena oh, Mike. oh, oh, oh, Mike.

            I like the guy and appreciate what he does but just...

            this isn't a thing.

            does he think all the other companies are just sitting around eating bonbons, and this one specific company is busy?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • javascript@app.wafrn.netJ javascript@app.wafrn.net

              yeah actually the concept of DID as decentralized identifiers can have its equivalent in the Portable Objects Proposal described here: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/ef61/fep-ef61.md

              This is just more complex to do in an ecosystem like the fediverse where implementations are (and have been for a long time) less standarized

              mariusor@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
              mariusor@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
              mariusor@metalhead.club
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #56

              @javascript I thought I was pretty clear in my initial statement: if DIDs are used as primary identifiers for objects, the resulting specification is no longer ActivityPub.

              Unless the SocialCG comes up with ActivityPub 2.0 that has DID as identifiers, I wouldn't call the implementations that use that FEP as ActivityPub compliant.

              @_elena @benroyce @stefan @mat

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

                @benroyce @mat tangentially related but I'm beginning to think that maybe the whole point of the ATmosphere being open is to find a way to capture billions of data points for profiling / monetization purposes? I know everything is public here too, but the language of their press release gave me the creeps.

                I may start referring to them as Blue$ky and the ATmo$phere.

                I mean what's the draw otherwise for VCs and crypto bros?

                jaypeach53@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jaypeach53@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jaypeach53@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #57

                @mat @_elena @benroyce B$ky is BullShit.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  @mariusor @stefan @_elena @mat

                  not in an effort to start a fight but just divulging my honest views on the topic:

                  so fucking what

                  just build shit

                  the spec can follow behind later

                  waiting for perfect spec structuring before doing anything is an exercise in inertia

                  mariusor@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mariusor@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mariusor@metalhead.club
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #58

                  @benroyce maybe you want to look through my post history before giving me advice to build shit. I'm not speaking from a point of ignorance.

                  The reason why some of us are trying to stick to the specification is to maximize compatibility between implementations. Each project adding their little flavour of functionality before even bothering to have a solid common foundation is detrimental to the health of the ecosystem as a whole.

                  @stefan @_elena @mat

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • markmetz@sfba.socialM markmetz@sfba.social

                    @_elena
                    Thanks for highlighting this.
                    Bsky smells of narrative capture to me, much like Substack, (who are now teaming up with prediction markets)

                    bazkie@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bazkie@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bazkie@beige.party
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #59

                    @markmetz @_elena what's narrative capture?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mariusor@metalhead.clubM mariusor@metalhead.club

                      @benroyce maybe you want to look through my post history before giving me advice to build shit. I'm not speaking from a point of ignorance.

                      The reason why some of us are trying to stick to the specification is to maximize compatibility between implementations. Each project adding their little flavour of functionality before even bothering to have a solid common foundation is detrimental to the health of the ecosystem as a whole.

                      @stefan @_elena @mat

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      benroyce@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #60

                      @mariusor @stefan @_elena @mat

                      i don't give a shit about your post history. i have no doubt you're quite knowledgeable and i don't think you're ignorant at all

                      but i think "stick to the spec" is purposeful impotence

                      just build shit and fuck the spec. the spec can follow along later, and if a feature is useful and popular, other projects can copy it

                      nevermind that demanding spec authority in a decentralized system is a fool's errand

                      just do whatever the fuck you want, fuck specs

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

                        @benroyce @mat tangentially related but I'm beginning to think that maybe the whole point of the ATmosphere being open is to find a way to capture billions of data points for profiling / monetization purposes? I know everything is public here too, but the language of their press release gave me the creeps.

                        I may start referring to them as Blue$ky and the ATmo$phere.

                        I mean what's the draw otherwise for VCs and crypto bros?

                        wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wjmaggos@liberal.city
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #61

                        @_elena @benroyce @mat

                        imo we should think of social media (the social news feed ala bluesky and mastodon etc) as totally public like blogs you can boost. that's different than messaging and groups that need privacy, what I call social networking.

                        I think bluesky's goal is to be the Google/Gmail of all of social media. "it's open so you could use other services but we make it easy and provide a better experience." the way the app view works makes that possible unlike how AP works. enshittify.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tedmielczarek@mastodon.socialT tedmielczarek@mastodon.social

                          @_elena all the startups I've worked for have blasted out press releases the moment their funding rounds closed. Part of being a startup means constantly vying for attention. This explanation does not hold up.

                          abucci@buc.ciA This user is from outside of this forum
                          abucci@buc.ciA This user is from outside of this forum
                          abucci@buc.ci
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #62
                          @tedmielczarek@mastodon.social @_elena@mastodon.social I have had the same experience. I co-founded a startup in 2016 that managed to secure a funding round, and the VCs themselves were giddy about announcing it as widely as possible. I've consulted for startups both before and after that, and as far as I'm aware every one of them that secured funding rapidly announced it. This explanation from Bluesky does not pass a basic smell test.
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tedmielczarek@mastodon.socialT tedmielczarek@mastodon.social

                            @_elena all the startups I've worked for have blasted out press releases the moment their funding rounds closed. Part of being a startup means constantly vying for attention. This explanation does not hold up.

                            hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #63

                            @tedmielczarek @_elena series B is one of the stages that represents a categorical step up in financing and control structures. series G like sure at that point people tend to stop counting but B is still a champagne event

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • nickapos@mastodon.oncrete.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nickapos@mastodon.oncrete.ukN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nickapos@mastodon.oncrete.uk
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #64

                              @benroyce @_elena Yeah i completely agree

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • folfdk@helvede.netF folfdk@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper