Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Whoever came up with the system “if you don’t allocate all of your yearly budget, your budget will be smaller next year” is responsible for so much human misery and wasted money

Whoever came up with the system “if you don’t allocate all of your yearly budget, your budget will be smaller next year” is responsible for so much human misery and wasted money

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
43 Indlæg 32 Posters 247 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • timwardcam@c.imT timwardcam@c.im

    @sidereal In my council money could be carried forward if there was a good reason (typically projects that didn't meet their worst case (budget-wise!) timescales).

    Anyone caught wasting money towards the end of the year just because it was left in their budget would have been dealt with.

    timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
    timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
    timwardcam@c.im
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #33

    @sidereal Oh, there was one example though.

    We put in a £250,000 budget line for "planning appeal legal costs" because we suspected a particularly developer was going to play silly buggers over a particular project, and we wanted to indicate that we were ready and willing to fight.

    Having spotted this, the developer chose not to play silly buggers, so this budget line was removed the next year, having not been spent and no longer being needed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sidereal@kolektiva.socialS sidereal@kolektiva.social

      Whoever came up with the system “if you don’t allocate all of your yearly budget, your budget will be smaller next year” is responsible for so much human misery and wasted money

      staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      staringatclouds@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #34

      @sidereal I have never seen any sense in that

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sidereal@kolektiva.socialS sidereal@kolektiva.social

        Whoever came up with the system “if you don’t allocate all of your yearly budget, your budget will be smaller next year” is responsible for so much human misery and wasted money

        thefathippy@mastodon.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
        thefathippy@mastodon.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
        thefathippy@mastodon.world
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #35

        @sidereal

        When I joined the uni, I was told that my goal was to slightly overspend the budget, & never, ever, underspend.

        As others have said, responsible budgeting was punished by reducing funding. Irresponsible budgeters received increases. Obviously, they hadn't been given enough...

        Of course, as a former public servant, I was very familiar with the practice.

        bluezcrab496@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sidereal@kolektiva.socialS sidereal@kolektiva.social

          Whoever came up with the system “if you don’t allocate all of your yearly budget, your budget will be smaller next year” is responsible for so much human misery and wasted money

          justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
          justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
          justinderrick@mstdn.ca
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #36

          @sidereal My favourite rule was "We're increasing our fees by 3% next year."

          Me: "Why? We have a surplus."

          President: "Because we have to make increases in line with inflation."

          Me: "Even though we don't need them?"

          Pres: "Yes, so that we can go a year without increasing them."

          Me: "We can not increase them this year."

          Pres: "That's not what I'm talking about."

          That was in the mid 2010's.

          Then COVID happened. And they didn't increase fees for almost three years, and it was a relatively minor hit, and they survived the pandemic, as did most of their clients.

          salty@mastodon.nzS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sidereal@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sidereal@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sidereal@kolektiva.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #37

            @nomdeb congress is the opposite of progress am i right guys

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • thefathippy@mastodon.worldT thefathippy@mastodon.world

              @sidereal

              When I joined the uni, I was told that my goal was to slightly overspend the budget, & never, ever, underspend.

              As others have said, responsible budgeting was punished by reducing funding. Irresponsible budgeters received increases. Obviously, they hadn't been given enough...

              Of course, as a former public servant, I was very familiar with the practice.

              bluezcrab496@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              bluezcrab496@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              bluezcrab496@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #38

              @thefathippy @sidereal

              This is so true and factual. Took a while as a staff status to be informed between OCO (outgoing capital outlay) and NOCO (non capital outlay) funding accounts and why they matter to spending in departments across the uni.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • johnzajac@dice.campJ johnzajac@dice.camp

                @sidereal

                Efficiency fetishism has a lot to answer for.

                mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                mason@partychickens.net
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #39

                @johnzajac @sidereal There is such a thing as too much efficiency. There is such a thing as "enough". Endless economic growth is a fiction. Imagine if we all strived for endless personal growth instead.

                johnzajac@dice.campJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mason@partychickens.netM mason@partychickens.net

                  @johnzajac @sidereal There is such a thing as too much efficiency. There is such a thing as "enough". Endless economic growth is a fiction. Imagine if we all strived for endless personal growth instead.

                  johnzajac@dice.campJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  johnzajac@dice.campJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  johnzajac@dice.camp
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #40

                  @mason @sidereal

                  Efficiency as a result of excellent planning based on deep knowledge and decades of skill is great. Efficiency as a goal is pathological.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sidereal@kolektiva.socialS sidereal@kolektiva.social

                    Whoever came up with the system “if you don’t allocate all of your yearly budget, your budget will be smaller next year” is responsible for so much human misery and wasted money

                    cptbutton@dice.campC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cptbutton@dice.campC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cptbutton@dice.camp
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #41

                    @sidereal

                    I once pressed the "return" key on September 30th and thereby spent many millions of dollars.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • justinderrick@mstdn.caJ justinderrick@mstdn.ca

                      @sidereal My favourite rule was "We're increasing our fees by 3% next year."

                      Me: "Why? We have a surplus."

                      President: "Because we have to make increases in line with inflation."

                      Me: "Even though we don't need them?"

                      Pres: "Yes, so that we can go a year without increasing them."

                      Me: "We can not increase them this year."

                      Pres: "That's not what I'm talking about."

                      That was in the mid 2010's.

                      Then COVID happened. And they didn't increase fees for almost three years, and it was a relatively minor hit, and they survived the pandemic, as did most of their clients.

                      salty@mastodon.nzS This user is from outside of this forum
                      salty@mastodon.nzS This user is from outside of this forum
                      salty@mastodon.nz
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #42

                      @JustinDerrick @sidereal and then they put up their fees by 30% because reasons?

                      justinderrick@mstdn.caJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • salty@mastodon.nzS salty@mastodon.nz

                        @JustinDerrick @sidereal and then they put up their fees by 30% because reasons?

                        justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        justinderrick@mstdn.ca
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #43

                        @Salty @sidereal Not sure, I was only there a short time. But they were accumulating surpluses into a contingency fund, which they drew on during the pandemic.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tofticles@helvede.netT tofticles@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper