Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm.

"Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
44 Indlæg 33 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • antanicus@puntarella.partyA antanicus@puntarella.party

    "Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm. Crops chase sunlight, so roofing a field with panels ought to starve them. Yet plot after plot came in with more fruit, not less, and the plants looked healthier than the ones baking in the open. Stranger still, the shaded rows did it while drinking far less water. (...) Chiltepin pepper plants produced three times as much fruit as those grown in full sun. Jalapenos matched their usual harvest while using 65 percent less water. Tomatoes grown under the array came in at twice the normal yield."

    Good luck achieving that with a nuclear reactor.

    https://energiesmedia.com/solar-panels-farmland-crops-agrivoltaics/

    nielso@digitalcourage.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nielso@digitalcourage.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nielso@digitalcourage.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #30

    @antanicus

    Pilot projects in Southern Germany have shown similar effects with apple orchards. It has become too hot and sunny for the types of apples traditionally grown in the region.

    Another topic for growing apples is hail, which can destroy the fruits. Solar panels also provide protection against hail. (Well, until the hailstorms get so desastrous that they also kill solar panels, okay.)

    schnitzer@sueden.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • amanda@jawns.clubA amanda@jawns.club

      @antanicus This reminds me a bit of fruit walls, the technique that northern Europeans used in the 17th century to create teeny microclimates for a specific crop: https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2015/12/fruit-walls-urban-farming-in-the-1600s/

      I first learned about those at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden; they have examples of that espalier pruning technique in their collection.

      nellythewillow@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nellythewillow@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nellythewillow@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #31

      @amanda @antanicus Fruit walls are still used extensively today and taught in horticultural colleges, in England at least and elsewhere I would have thought.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • boerps@nrw.socialB boerps@nrw.social

        @antanicus
        Ach? Warum bauen Landwirte wohl Folientunnel?

        feinschmeckergarten@norden.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        feinschmeckergarten@norden.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        feinschmeckergarten@norden.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #32

        @Boerps Weil es z.B. in Norddeutschland für viele Pflanzen draußen einfach zu kalt und zu nass ist. Da nimmt man dann auch in Kauf, dass die Lichttransmission von Plastikfolien etwas geringer ist als die von Glas, weil Plastik so viel billiger ist.

        @antanicus

        boerps@nrw.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • feinschmeckergarten@norden.socialF feinschmeckergarten@norden.social

          @Boerps Weil es z.B. in Norddeutschland für viele Pflanzen draußen einfach zu kalt und zu nass ist. Da nimmt man dann auch in Kauf, dass die Lichttransmission von Plastikfolien etwas geringer ist als die von Glas, weil Plastik so viel billiger ist.

          @antanicus

          boerps@nrw.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          boerps@nrw.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          boerps@nrw.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #33

          @feinschmeckergarten @antanicus
          Auch. Aber auch zum Beschatten. Und da kann man auch gut Solarzellen nehmen. Drunter ist die Belüftung sogar noch besser.

          feinschmeckergarten@norden.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • boerps@nrw.socialB boerps@nrw.social

            @feinschmeckergarten @antanicus
            Auch. Aber auch zum Beschatten. Und da kann man auch gut Solarzellen nehmen. Drunter ist die Belüftung sogar noch besser.

            feinschmeckergarten@norden.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            feinschmeckergarten@norden.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            feinschmeckergarten@norden.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #34

            @Boerps
            Das gibt Schattennetze für Folientunnel und in Zukunft werden die bestimmt auch wichtiger. Meine Tunnel sind diesen Sommer teilweise auch überheizt.
            Aber Phoenix/Arizona hat ziemlich genau die doppelte Globalstrahlung wie Berlin. Es kommt also von der Sonne doppelt so viel Energie pro Quadratmeter an.
            Wie einige Vortrötende geschrieben haben, es kommt völlig auf das örtliche Klima an, ob man mehr oder weniger Licht braucht.
            @antanicus

            boerps@nrw.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • feinschmeckergarten@norden.socialF feinschmeckergarten@norden.social

              @Boerps
              Das gibt Schattennetze für Folientunnel und in Zukunft werden die bestimmt auch wichtiger. Meine Tunnel sind diesen Sommer teilweise auch überheizt.
              Aber Phoenix/Arizona hat ziemlich genau die doppelte Globalstrahlung wie Berlin. Es kommt also von der Sonne doppelt so viel Energie pro Quadratmeter an.
              Wie einige Vortrötende geschrieben haben, es kommt völlig auf das örtliche Klima an, ob man mehr oder weniger Licht braucht.
              @antanicus

              boerps@nrw.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              boerps@nrw.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              boerps@nrw.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #35

              @feinschmeckergarten @antanicus
              In diesem Newsartikel war man sehr verwundert, dass unter Solarzellen etwas wächst. Warum nicht. IMHO benutzen Hopfenbauern in Bayern Solarzellen auch als Schattierung. Und Hopfen ist keine kleine Pflanze.

              Offensichtlich ist diese Technik noch nicht sehr verbreitet.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • antanicus@puntarella.partyA antanicus@puntarella.party

                "Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm. Crops chase sunlight, so roofing a field with panels ought to starve them. Yet plot after plot came in with more fruit, not less, and the plants looked healthier than the ones baking in the open. Stranger still, the shaded rows did it while drinking far less water. (...) Chiltepin pepper plants produced three times as much fruit as those grown in full sun. Jalapenos matched their usual harvest while using 65 percent less water. Tomatoes grown under the array came in at twice the normal yield."

                Good luck achieving that with a nuclear reactor.

                https://energiesmedia.com/solar-panels-farmland-crops-agrivoltaics/

                ardubal@mastodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
                ardubal@mastodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
                ardubal@mastodon.xyz
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #36

                @antanicus I could do that with a nuclear reactor, a random number generator, and a bunch of wooden boards, though.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nielso@digitalcourage.socialN nielso@digitalcourage.social

                  @antanicus

                  Pilot projects in Southern Germany have shown similar effects with apple orchards. It has become too hot and sunny for the types of apples traditionally grown in the region.

                  Another topic for growing apples is hail, which can destroy the fruits. Solar panels also provide protection against hail. (Well, until the hailstorms get so desastrous that they also kill solar panels, okay.)

                  schnitzer@sueden.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  schnitzer@sueden.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  schnitzer@sueden.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #37

                  @nielso @antanicus Do you happen to have a few links handy? I had this topic with someone around the bodensee

                  sandorspruit@mastodon.nlS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • antanicus@puntarella.partyA antanicus@puntarella.party

                    "Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm. Crops chase sunlight, so roofing a field with panels ought to starve them. Yet plot after plot came in with more fruit, not less, and the plants looked healthier than the ones baking in the open. Stranger still, the shaded rows did it while drinking far less water. (...) Chiltepin pepper plants produced three times as much fruit as those grown in full sun. Jalapenos matched their usual harvest while using 65 percent less water. Tomatoes grown under the array came in at twice the normal yield."

                    Good luck achieving that with a nuclear reactor.

                    https://energiesmedia.com/solar-panels-farmland-crops-agrivoltaics/

                    vosje62@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vosje62@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vosje62@mastodon.nl
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #38

                    @antanicus @paulschoe farmers did not know?

                    It is just the science about plants that has shown that for a long time. Well known scientific facts.

                    (I will stop here.. 😅 😇)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • juh@hostsharing.coopJ juh@hostsharing.coop

                      @antanicus No one could have foreseen that! Why doesn’t Trump just issue a decree to change the laws of nature?

                      vosje62@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vosje62@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vosje62@mastodon.nl
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #39

                      @juh @antanicus

                      Next on his list: remove all solarpanels.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • schnitzer@sueden.socialS schnitzer@sueden.social

                        @nielso @antanicus Do you happen to have a few links handy? I had this topic with someone around the bodensee

                        sandorspruit@mastodon.nlS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sandorspruit@mastodon.nlS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sandorspruit@mastodon.nl
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #40

                        @schnitzer @nielso @antanicus Links would be much appreciated, this may be relevant for our farm as well in the future. Wait, I noticed one or two links when I scroll all the way down.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • amanda@jawns.clubA amanda@jawns.club

                          @antanicus This reminds me a bit of fruit walls, the technique that northern Europeans used in the 17th century to create teeny microclimates for a specific crop: https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2015/12/fruit-walls-urban-farming-in-the-1600s/

                          I first learned about those at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden; they have examples of that espalier pruning technique in their collection.

                          vosje62@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                          vosje62@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                          vosje62@mastodon.nl
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #41

                          @amanda @antanicus

                          They still exist in various ways with differences in different countries.

                          Crinkle crankle wall - Wikipedia
                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crinkle_crankle_wall

                          Pics: slangenmuur at DuckDuckGo (Dutch)
                          https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=slangenmuur&l=nl-nl&rpl=1&ia=images&iax=images

                          Crinkle crankle wall at DuckDuckGo (English)
                          https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=Crinkle+crankle+wall&l=nl-nl&rpl=1&ia=images&iax=images

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • antanicus@puntarella.partyA antanicus@puntarella.party

                            "Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm. Crops chase sunlight, so roofing a field with panels ought to starve them. Yet plot after plot came in with more fruit, not less, and the plants looked healthier than the ones baking in the open. Stranger still, the shaded rows did it while drinking far less water. (...) Chiltepin pepper plants produced three times as much fruit as those grown in full sun. Jalapenos matched their usual harvest while using 65 percent less water. Tomatoes grown under the array came in at twice the normal yield."

                            Good luck achieving that with a nuclear reactor.

                            https://energiesmedia.com/solar-panels-farmland-crops-agrivoltaics/

                            2k115@mastodon.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
                            2k115@mastodon.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
                            2k115@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #42

                            @antanicus Agrivoltaics is a rare win-win: solar panels cut thermal stress and evaporation while generating clean power. Doubling crop yields on 65% less water completely shatters the "food vs. energy" soil conflict. Decentralized, multi-use infrastructure beats single-purpose energy plants every time.
                            ​#Agrivoltaics #Renewables

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • antanicus@puntarella.partyA antanicus@puntarella.party

                              "Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm. Crops chase sunlight, so roofing a field with panels ought to starve them. Yet plot after plot came in with more fruit, not less, and the plants looked healthier than the ones baking in the open. Stranger still, the shaded rows did it while drinking far less water. (...) Chiltepin pepper plants produced three times as much fruit as those grown in full sun. Jalapenos matched their usual harvest while using 65 percent less water. Tomatoes grown under the array came in at twice the normal yield."

                              Good luck achieving that with a nuclear reactor.

                              https://energiesmedia.com/solar-panels-farmland-crops-agrivoltaics/

                              valhalla@social.gl-como.itV This user is from outside of this forum
                              valhalla@social.gl-como.itV This user is from outside of this forum
                              valhalla@social.gl-como.it
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #43

                              @antanicus

                              “Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm”

                              I thought that the fact that some plants thrive in the sunlight and some thrive in the shade was pretty much obviously known

                              And that at least farmers would know that which plants are which depend both on the plant and the location / climate where you're trying to grow them

                              And that the non obvious bit that requires nontrivial experiments is actually finding out which ones are which in the various places in a changing climate

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • antanicus@puntarella.partyA antanicus@puntarella.party

                                "Shade is supposed to be the enemy of a farm. Crops chase sunlight, so roofing a field with panels ought to starve them. Yet plot after plot came in with more fruit, not less, and the plants looked healthier than the ones baking in the open. Stranger still, the shaded rows did it while drinking far less water. (...) Chiltepin pepper plants produced three times as much fruit as those grown in full sun. Jalapenos matched their usual harvest while using 65 percent less water. Tomatoes grown under the array came in at twice the normal yield."

                                Good luck achieving that with a nuclear reactor.

                                https://energiesmedia.com/solar-panels-farmland-crops-agrivoltaics/

                                ygor@floss.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                ygor@floss.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                ygor@floss.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #44

                                RE: https://floss.social/@ygor/115349153074693462

                                @antanicus I'm thinking back to the book I read last year, and wondering what that means for the LER. Could it be higher than 2?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • suneauken@mastodon.worldS suneauken@mastodon.world shared this topic
                                Svar
                                • Svar som emne
                                Login for at svare
                                • Ældste til nyeste
                                • Nyeste til ældste
                                • Most Votes


                                • Log ind

                                • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Hjem
                                • Seneste
                                • Etiketter
                                • Populære
                                • Verden
                                • Bruger
                                • Grupper