Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I have a really nice (horrifying) image stack that one of my research team members made, that powerfully demonstrates what a huge problem satellite streaks are for wide-field imaging.

I have a really nice (horrifying) image stack that one of my research team members made, that powerfully demonstrates what a huge problem satellite streaks are for wide-field imaging.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
14 Indlæg 12 Posters 7 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    I have a really nice (horrifying) image stack that one of my research team members made, that powerfully demonstrates what a huge problem satellite streaks are for wide-field imaging. This is a 3 hour stack of star-subtracted 5 minute exposures using the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. The short diagonal lines are asteroids. The long diagonal lines are sunlit satellites that passed through the field of view during the exposure.

    gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
    gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
    gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #5

    @sundogplanets

    Paradoxically, an asteroid can hit the Earth by traveling hidden by the satellite streaks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      Now the really horrible part: this image was taken in August 2022. According to @planet4589.bsky.social's website https://planet4589.org/space/stats/out/stat001.txt, there are almost TEN THOUSAND MORE ACTIVE SATELLITES today than there were in August 2022.

      Fuck.

      moppi@chaos.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      moppi@chaos.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      moppi@chaos.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #6

      @sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social

      and we have not Talked about the Kessler-syndrom what us locked in on our planet for generations.

      But a Couple of Billonairs can do what ever they want 😕

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        Now the really horrible part: this image was taken in August 2022. According to @planet4589.bsky.social's website https://planet4589.org/space/stats/out/stat001.txt, there are almost TEN THOUSAND MORE ACTIVE SATELLITES today than there were in August 2022.

        Fuck.

        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #7

        @sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy

        Arrrrgh!

        Well, if Elon's Empire crashes, how long before they all fall down?

        Sadly Bezo's Bazaar isn't as likely to fail.

        equalitysiren@mstdn.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          Now the really horrible part: this image was taken in August 2022. According to @planet4589.bsky.social's website https://planet4589.org/space/stats/out/stat001.txt, there are almost TEN THOUSAND MORE ACTIVE SATELLITES today than there were in August 2022.

          Fuck.

          tallsimon@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
          tallsimon@mstdn.caT This user is from outside of this forum
          tallsimon@mstdn.ca
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #8

          @sundogplanets Eliminating our ability to observe is not the way I thought we would avoid the "Don't Look Up" scenario. 🤔

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            Now the really horrible part: this image was taken in August 2022. According to @planet4589.bsky.social's website https://planet4589.org/space/stats/out/stat001.txt, there are almost TEN THOUSAND MORE ACTIVE SATELLITES today than there were in August 2022.

            Fuck.

            pietkuip@mastodon.nlP This user is from outside of this forum
            pietkuip@mastodon.nlP This user is from outside of this forum
            pietkuip@mastodon.nl
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #9

            @sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social And I was just thinking at the photo: “That is not so bad for a three-hour exposure.”

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              I have a really nice (horrifying) image stack that one of my research team members made, that powerfully demonstrates what a huge problem satellite streaks are for wide-field imaging. This is a 3 hour stack of star-subtracted 5 minute exposures using the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. The short diagonal lines are asteroids. The long diagonal lines are sunlit satellites that passed through the field of view during the exposure.

              pwei888@fediscience.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
              pwei888@fediscience.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
              pwei888@fediscience.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #10

              @sundogplanets Just curious: What does "star-subtracted" mean here?🤔 (I still see a large number of pretty compact objects.)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                I have a really nice (horrifying) image stack that one of my research team members made, that powerfully demonstrates what a huge problem satellite streaks are for wide-field imaging. This is a 3 hour stack of star-subtracted 5 minute exposures using the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. The short diagonal lines are asteroids. The long diagonal lines are sunlit satellites that passed through the field of view during the exposure.

                snowblind2005@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                snowblind2005@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                snowblind2005@social.vivaldi.net
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #11

                @sundogplanets

                UFO's Sam. U.F.OHS!

                Clearly this is an invasion. What's captured here are the naked manships without their towel cloaks exposing themselves.
                A scientist posted images from their secret CFH alien containment facility of a baby Pierson's Puppeteer this past week as well.
                Perhaps we should start planting corn in these wide-fields to block them from spying on us and we can hear them rustling around.

                May The Farce Be With You

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  I have a really nice (horrifying) image stack that one of my research team members made, that powerfully demonstrates what a huge problem satellite streaks are for wide-field imaging. This is a 3 hour stack of star-subtracted 5 minute exposures using the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. The short diagonal lines are asteroids. The long diagonal lines are sunlit satellites that passed through the field of view during the exposure.

                  dckim@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dckim@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dckim@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #12

                  @sundogplanets as a follow up, I would ask what percentage of the night-sky is obscured by this? Is the addition light pollution a concern for accuracy?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                    @sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy

                    Arrrrgh!

                    Well, if Elon's Empire crashes, how long before they all fall down?

                    Sadly Bezo's Bazaar isn't as likely to fail.

                    equalitysiren@mstdn.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    equalitysiren@mstdn.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    equalitysiren@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #13

                    @raymaccarthy @sundogplanets
                    And to think it was so ridiculous to have a satellite fall on your boyfriend in Northern Exposure.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      I have a really nice (horrifying) image stack that one of my research team members made, that powerfully demonstrates what a huge problem satellite streaks are for wide-field imaging. This is a 3 hour stack of star-subtracted 5 minute exposures using the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. The short diagonal lines are asteroids. The long diagonal lines are sunlit satellites that passed through the field of view during the exposure.

                      scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      scaletheory@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #14

                      @sundogplanets

                      Polluting everything, humans suck.

                      Prove me wrong

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper