In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time.
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
Just to be clear, there are people called sommeliers who genuinely believe they can taste tannins in white wine. You’d need the nose of a molecular bloodhound for that. So no, it doesn’t surprise me that Star Trek has people like this.
By the way, have you heard the one about CD-ROMs being worse than vinyl in terms of sound quality?
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless Please continue, I am very much looking forward to reading your 100 page essay.
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
If I were Star Trek people I would be more concerned about where the replicators get the matter the food is made of, and why aren't there any bathrooms on the Enterprise?
-
If I were Star Trek people I would be more concerned about where the replicators get the matter the food is made of, and why aren't there any bathrooms on the Enterprise?
@anon20394702398750 @MostlyHarmless the Dadmiral talks about that one
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless I always assumed it's because replicated food is based off of a lower-resolution template, whilst the transporter does a unique high-res (destructive) copy of an object. So, every replicated steak is 'the same steak', and the compression artifacts make it a bit less good than the real thing.
(This makes sense if you consider several episodes of Star Trek imply it takes huge amounts of storage to hold a transporter pattern, yet replicators have extensive menus available to them - clearly replicator patterns are compressed or just low-res by comparison, with an apparently noticeable quality trade-off)
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless Can you also make it a talk on media.ccc.de?
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless would this also apply to “mouth feel”?
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless If scrambled eggs tasted exactly the same every single time, they would seem to have "less flavor" than real eggs.
-
If I were Star Trek people I would be more concerned about where the replicators get the matter the food is made of, and why aren't there any bathrooms on the Enterprise?
@anon20394702398750 @MostlyHarmless
"JFC! Number One took a number two!" -
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless I assumed it was like a garden rule tomato vs a hot house tomato
Same thing, different growing conditions, different flavor (so grown in dirt vs assembled out of molecules)
Did Spock start out vine ripened? Does a transporter turn him into a hot house ripened Spock and change the flavor? -
@MostlyHarmless If scrambled eggs tasted exactly the same every single time, they would seem to have "less flavor" than real eggs.
@howtophil @MostlyHarmless I think this is it
At some point someone scanned a plate of scrambled eggs and everyone has been eating that same plate of scrambled eggs ever since
You don't get the variations in flavour and texture like you would with a meal prepared by hand
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless
hmmm physics would then suggest there is an anti-Spock somewhere, getting more and more flavourful over time. Once again the mysteries of the universe are explained.
[Causally browsing Spock recipes on the internet] -
@howtophil @MostlyHarmless I think this is it
At some point someone scanned a plate of scrambled eggs and everyone has been eating that same plate of scrambled eggs ever since
You don't get the variations in flavour and texture like you would with a meal prepared by hand
@Wearwolf @MostlyHarmless Eyup
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
Did they manufacture each replicator individually, or just make the first one, then use it to replicate all the other replicators?
-
If I were Star Trek people I would be more concerned about where the replicators get the matter the food is made of, and why aren't there any bathrooms on the Enterprise?
@anon20394702398750 @MostlyHarmless
Jean Luc shaves his head in his study.
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless (a) I regret that I know the technical manual answer to this discrepancy.
(b) If I didn't know it, I would be perfectly willing to accept that it's like people who prefer analog to digital music because they miss the "warmth" of a record player.
-
In Star Trek people often complain that replicated food is not as good as naturally produced food, which is weird when replicators are presumably using the same technology as transporters, which can perfectly replicate Spock every time. But is Spock getting less flavoursome over time? In this essay I shall…
@MostlyHarmless the weak point is that the transporter is copying a reference object (the person being transported) whereas presumably the food replicators are working from a software copy of food, I would guess. They're having to put the food together from scratch as it were without a physical reference. Maybe that matters??
-
@howtophil @MostlyHarmless I think this is it
At some point someone scanned a plate of scrambled eggs and everyone has been eating that same plate of scrambled eggs ever since
You don't get the variations in flavour and texture like you would with a meal prepared by hand
My first thought was to randomize the pattern mathematically, but…that's pretty much what LLMs do with language, and what procedural generation in video games does, and neither of them is a substitute for hand-made novelty.
Also, doing this realistically may require numerous iterations of an extremely detailed physics simulation in which animals are created and killed over and over, and therefore be both computationally infeasible and highly unethical.
-
My first thought was to randomize the pattern mathematically, but…that's pretty much what LLMs do with language, and what procedural generation in video games does, and neither of them is a substitute for hand-made novelty.
Also, doing this realistically may require numerous iterations of an extremely detailed physics simulation in which animals are created and killed over and over, and therefore be both computationally infeasible and highly unethical.
@argv_minus_one @Wearwolf @howtophil @MostlyHarmless Just turn up the temperature on the replicator and eat whatever tail probability tokens get scrambled in
-
@MostlyHarmless I always assumed it's because replicated food is based off of a lower-resolution template, whilst the transporter does a unique high-res (destructive) copy of an object. So, every replicated steak is 'the same steak', and the compression artifacts make it a bit less good than the real thing.
(This makes sense if you consider several episodes of Star Trek imply it takes huge amounts of storage to hold a transporter pattern, yet replicators have extensive menus available to them - clearly replicator patterns are compressed or just low-res by comparison, with an apparently noticeable quality trade-off)
@aoanla @MostlyHarmless I *seem* to recall a mention that replicated food will turn into mush if you let it sit for too long? That would also speak for a "lower resolution," I suppose.
