Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. For complicated museum reasons (and just because I was curious) I was looking in the archive for an exhibition held in 1995.

For complicated museum reasons (and just because I was curious) I was looking in the archive for an exhibition held in 1995.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
museumlifeartmuseumrecenthistory
5 Indlæg 3 Posters 8 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jonassmith@theforkiverse.com
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #1

    For complicated museum reasons (and just because I was curious) I was looking in the archive for an exhibition held in 1995. If you were press you could apparently get a 35mm negative as a handout.
    If you had questions you could contact "The Information Department".
    Good times.
    #1995 #museumlife #artmuseum #recenthistory

    camlarsch@helvede.netC betabug@mastodon.sdf.orgB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ jonassmith@theforkiverse.com

      For complicated museum reasons (and just because I was curious) I was looking in the archive for an exhibition held in 1995. If you were press you could apparently get a 35mm negative as a handout.
      If you had questions you could contact "The Information Department".
      Good times.
      #1995 #museumlife #artmuseum #recenthistory

      camlarsch@helvede.netC This user is from outside of this forum
      camlarsch@helvede.netC This user is from outside of this forum
      camlarsch@helvede.net
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @jonassmith 1995 er åbenbart længe siden!

      jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • camlarsch@helvede.netC camlarsch@helvede.net

        @jonassmith 1995 er åbenbart længe siden!

        jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jonassmith@theforkiverse.com
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @Camlarsch ja, det er altså lidt sjovt

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ jonassmith@theforkiverse.com

          For complicated museum reasons (and just because I was curious) I was looking in the archive for an exhibition held in 1995. If you were press you could apparently get a 35mm negative as a handout.
          If you had questions you could contact "The Information Department".
          Good times.
          #1995 #museumlife #artmuseum #recenthistory

          betabug@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
          betabug@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
          betabug@mastodon.sdf.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @jonassmith I was wondering how they would duplicate negatives to hand out, but in fact it's a "positive" (slide film, in this case Ektachrome 200). Duplication processes for these were more common (using special "internegative" films). Slide film was also much more usual for print production processes at the time.

          jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • betabug@mastodon.sdf.orgB betabug@mastodon.sdf.org

            @jonassmith I was wondering how they would duplicate negatives to hand out, but in fact it's a "positive" (slide film, in this case Ektachrome 200). Duplication processes for these were more common (using special "internegative" films). Slide film was also much more usual for print production processes at the time.

            jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jonassmith@theforkiverse.com
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @betabug that sounds exactly right, thanks for clarifying!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Svar
            • Svar som emne
            Login for at svare
            • Ældste til nyeste
            • Nyeste til ældste
            • Most Votes


            • Log ind

            • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

            • Login or register to search.
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            Graciously hosted by data.coop
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Hjem
            • Seneste
            • Etiketter
            • Populære
            • Verden
            • Bruger
            • Grupper