Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. MAGA wants the nation to stick its head into the sand about #ClimateChange.

MAGA wants the nation to stick its head into the sand about #ClimateChange.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
climatechange
43 Indlæg 1 Posters 80 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

    "First, the administration asked Congress to revoke the EPA waiver that allows California to set the state's zero-emission vehicle mandate. That was an unprecedented move, and in May, Congress did as requested.

    Congress has defanged the CAFE standards by removing the fines for carmakers who fail to meet them.

    [And now,] Under the EPA's proposal, all the regulations related to cutting greenhouse gas emissions from cars would be removed."

    https://www.npr.org/2025/07/29/nx-s1-5463771/epa-greenhouse-gas-regulations-cars-pollution

    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #9

    Public comments will be accepted through September 21, while a public hearing will be held in August.

    The deregulatory push is also being challenged in court — and will almost certainly face more lawsuits.

    https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/proposed-rule-reconsideration-2009-endangerment-finding

    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

      Public comments will be accepted through September 21, while a public hearing will be held in August.

      The deregulatory push is also being challenged in court — and will almost certainly face more lawsuits.

      https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/proposed-rule-reconsideration-2009-endangerment-finding

      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #10

      "DeSmog has been tracking and building databases on the anti-endangerment coalition for years. Below is our guide to the top fossil fuel groups, conservative policymakers, and climate deniers leading the effort to demolish the bedrock of American climate policy."

      Spoiler: all the usual climate deniers with a financial interest in keeping fossil fuels going.

      https://www.desmog.com/2025/07/30/climate-deniers-trump-epa-endangerment-finding/

      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

        "DeSmog has been tracking and building databases on the anti-endangerment coalition for years. Below is our guide to the top fossil fuel groups, conservative policymakers, and climate deniers leading the effort to demolish the bedrock of American climate policy."

        Spoiler: all the usual climate deniers with a financial interest in keeping fossil fuels going.

        https://www.desmog.com/2025/07/30/climate-deniers-trump-epa-endangerment-finding/

        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #11

        "The Trump administration is justifying its move to gut the endangerment finding based on a report it commissioned from five climate skeptics.

        The Trump administration’s report should not be viewed as a scientific document, according to Andrew Dessler, director of the Texas Center for Extreme Weather at Texas A&M University.

        “Their goal is not to weigh the evidence fairly but to build the strongest possible case for CO2’s innocence.” "

        https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/01/politics/us-government-epa-climate-change

        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

          "The Trump administration is justifying its move to gut the endangerment finding based on a report it commissioned from five climate skeptics.

          The Trump administration’s report should not be viewed as a scientific document, according to Andrew Dessler, director of the Texas Center for Extreme Weather at Texas A&M University.

          “Their goal is not to weigh the evidence fairly but to build the strongest possible case for CO2’s innocence.” "

          https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/01/politics/us-government-epa-climate-change

          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #12

          Former EPA administrator and White House National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy: “Instead of doing their job, this EPA is putting the safety of our loved ones at risk while ratcheting up grid instability, energy bills, and disaster costs.”

          "In order to justify a decision that seems to fly in the face of legal precedent and overwhelming scientific evidence, the EPA relies primarily on a two-part argument."

          https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2025/08/the-republican-campaign-to-stop-the-u-s-epa-from-protecting-the-climate/

          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

            Former EPA administrator and White House National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy: “Instead of doing their job, this EPA is putting the safety of our loved ones at risk while ratcheting up grid instability, energy bills, and disaster costs.”

            "In order to justify a decision that seems to fly in the face of legal precedent and overwhelming scientific evidence, the EPA relies primarily on a two-part argument."

            https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2025/08/the-republican-campaign-to-stop-the-u-s-epa-from-protecting-the-climate/

            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #13

            "Bad air quality is not dramatic like a flood, a fire, or a heat wave. If you’re lucky enough to live and work in air-conditioned spaces, you might not notice it at all. Many of the friends and relations of people killed by air pollution won’t realize that the fossil fuel industry—and insufficient government regulation—is to blame. Air pollution is already an ongoing massacre, and Lee Zeldin’s moves this month will kill many more people."

            https://newrepublic.com/article/198675/bad-air-quality-deadliest-effect-climate-change

            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

              "Bad air quality is not dramatic like a flood, a fire, or a heat wave. If you’re lucky enough to live and work in air-conditioned spaces, you might not notice it at all. Many of the friends and relations of people killed by air pollution won’t realize that the fossil fuel industry—and insufficient government regulation—is to blame. Air pollution is already an ongoing massacre, and Lee Zeldin’s moves this month will kill many more people."

              https://newrepublic.com/article/198675/bad-air-quality-deadliest-effect-climate-change

              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #14

              "If the Administration’s arguments prevail, “it’s going to be very hard for E.P.A. going forward to use the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases. So they’re trying to take that away permanently—not just for the next three and a half years.”

              The obvious beneficiary of the E.P.A.’s latest move is the fossil-fuel industry."

              https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-epas-disastrous-plan-to-end-the-regulation-of-greenhouse-gases

              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                "If the Administration’s arguments prevail, “it’s going to be very hard for E.P.A. going forward to use the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases. So they’re trying to take that away permanently—not just for the next three and a half years.”

                The obvious beneficiary of the E.P.A.’s latest move is the fossil-fuel industry."

                https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-epas-disastrous-plan-to-end-the-regulation-of-greenhouse-gases

                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #15

                The DOE report on which the EPA rollback of greenhouse gas regulation is based is seriously flawed.

                "All five [of its] authors have records of publishing misleading information.

                The [DOE] report cherry-picks information to misrepresent key climate change findings."

                https://science.feedback.org/review/misleading-u-s-department-energy-climate-report-chooses-bias-over-science-climate-scientists-say

                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                  The DOE report on which the EPA rollback of greenhouse gas regulation is based is seriously flawed.

                  "All five [of its] authors have records of publishing misleading information.

                  The [DOE] report cherry-picks information to misrepresent key climate change findings."

                  https://science.feedback.org/review/misleading-u-s-department-energy-climate-report-chooses-bias-over-science-climate-scientists-say

                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #16

                  The nation’s premier group of scientific advisers are weighing in.

                  "The move by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to self-fund the study is a departure from their typical practice of responding to requests by government agencies or Congress for advice. The Academies intend to publicly release it in September, in time to inform the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision on the so-called “endangerment finding”."

                  https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07082025/national-academies-will-review-endangerment-finding-science/

                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                    The nation’s premier group of scientific advisers are weighing in.

                    "The move by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to self-fund the study is a departure from their typical practice of responding to requests by government agencies or Congress for advice. The Academies intend to publicly release it in September, in time to inform the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision on the so-called “endangerment finding”."

                    https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07082025/national-academies-will-review-endangerment-finding-science/

                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #17

                    Meanwhile,

                    "US President Donald Trump's administration is revising past editions of the nation's premier climate report—its latest move to undermine the scientific consensus on human-caused global warming."

                    https://phys.org/news/2025-08-rewrite-national-climate.html

                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                      Meanwhile,

                      "US President Donald Trump's administration is revising past editions of the nation's premier climate report—its latest move to undermine the scientific consensus on human-caused global warming."

                      https://phys.org/news/2025-08-rewrite-national-climate.html

                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #18

                      "The suppression of climate data by the US government has global implications. The international scientific community depends on the US for critical data which helps in responding to climate disasters.

                      Disruptions to such data also risk deepening existing scientific and geopolitical inequalities. Limiting access to US climate datasets can especially impact the ability of vulnerable nations to address climate change effectively."

                      https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/inside-trumps-campaign-to-censor-climate-science/

                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                        "The suppression of climate data by the US government has global implications. The international scientific community depends on the US for critical data which helps in responding to climate disasters.

                        Disruptions to such data also risk deepening existing scientific and geopolitical inequalities. Limiting access to US climate datasets can especially impact the ability of vulnerable nations to address climate change effectively."

                        https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/inside-trumps-campaign-to-censor-climate-science/

                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #19

                        "Environmental advocates are suing the Trump administration over what they described as a secretive plan to undermine climate science.

                        There is a scientific consensus that climate change is exacerbating extreme weather.

                        In their suit, the groups alleged that the department and agency “have sought to manufacture a basis to reject” the scientific consensus on climate change."

                        https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5449186-environmental-groups-sue-trump/

                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                          "Environmental advocates are suing the Trump administration over what they described as a secretive plan to undermine climate science.

                          There is a scientific consensus that climate change is exacerbating extreme weather.

                          In their suit, the groups alleged that the department and agency “have sought to manufacture a basis to reject” the scientific consensus on climate change."

                          https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5449186-environmental-groups-sue-trump/

                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #20

                          Fact check

                          "A “critical assessment” report commissioned by the Trump administration to justify a rollback of US climate regulations contains at least 100 false or misleading statements, according to a Carbon Brief factcheck involving dozens of leading climate scientists."

                          https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/doe-factcheck/index.html

                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                            Fact check

                            "A “critical assessment” report commissioned by the Trump administration to justify a rollback of US climate regulations contains at least 100 false or misleading statements, according to a Carbon Brief factcheck involving dozens of leading climate scientists."

                            https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/doe-factcheck/index.html

                            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #21

                            "The Energy Department and the EPA seem to have run afoul of four laws in particular that may be tricky for the administration to get around. "

                            https://theconversation.com/4-laws-that-could-stymie-the-trump-epas-plan-to-rescind-the-endangerment-finding-central-to-us-climate-policies-262952

                            cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                              "The Energy Department and the EPA seem to have run afoul of four laws in particular that may be tricky for the administration to get around. "

                              https://theconversation.com/4-laws-that-could-stymie-the-trump-epas-plan-to-rescind-the-endangerment-finding-central-to-us-climate-policies-262952

                              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #22

                              "A group of the US’s leading climate scientists have compiled a withering review of a controversial Trump administration report that downplays the risks of the climate crisis, finding that the document is biased, riddled with errors and fails basic scientific credibility.""

                              https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-administration-climate-report

                              cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                "A group of the US’s leading climate scientists have compiled a withering review of a controversial Trump administration report that downplays the risks of the climate crisis, finding that the document is biased, riddled with errors and fails basic scientific credibility.""

                                https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-administration-climate-report

                                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #23

                                "For instance, the five skeptics contended that “meteorological drought” was not increasing in the United States; as the researchers point out in their response, this is cherry-picked nonsense.

                                The comment has sections like this on every topic raised by the D.O.E. report.

                                It’s a blitzkrieg of studies, observations, and data which makes clear that the authors [of the DOE report] were miles out of their depth, and further still out of the mainstream."

                                https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/trumps-department-of-energy-gets-scienced

                                cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                  "For instance, the five skeptics contended that “meteorological drought” was not increasing in the United States; as the researchers point out in their response, this is cherry-picked nonsense.

                                  The comment has sections like this on every topic raised by the D.O.E. report.

                                  It’s a blitzkrieg of studies, observations, and data which makes clear that the authors [of the DOE report] were miles out of their depth, and further still out of the mainstream."

                                  https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/trumps-department-of-energy-gets-scienced

                                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #24

                                  Climate denial working group disbanded.

                                  "The group’s end can be traced to a lawsuit filed by the Environmental Defense Fund and Union of Concerned Scientists.

                                  Though the group has been disbanded, DOE will not withdraw the report it authored, which sparked resistance across the climate science community and stirred a coordinated response during the required public-comment period."

                                  https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/10/climate/trump-dissolves-contrarian-group

                                  cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                    Climate denial working group disbanded.

                                    "The group’s end can be traced to a lawsuit filed by the Environmental Defense Fund and Union of Concerned Scientists.

                                    Though the group has been disbanded, DOE will not withdraw the report it authored, which sparked resistance across the climate science community and stirred a coordinated response during the required public-comment period."

                                    https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/10/climate/trump-dissolves-contrarian-group

                                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #25

                                    "The report stands in opposition to the Trump administration's decision in July to begin the process of revoking a key scientific finding published by the EPA in 2009 that six greenhouse gases are a threat to public health and must be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

                                    But the National Academies concluded that the 2009 [endangerment] finding was accurate and is bolstered by stronger evidence that has since been supported by additional scientific research."

                                    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/national-academies-rebukes-epa-climate-threats/

                                    cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                      "The report stands in opposition to the Trump administration's decision in July to begin the process of revoking a key scientific finding published by the EPA in 2009 that six greenhouse gases are a threat to public health and must be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

                                      But the National Academies concluded that the 2009 [endangerment] finding was accurate and is bolstered by stronger evidence that has since been supported by additional scientific research."

                                      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/national-academies-rebukes-epa-climate-threats/

                                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #26

                                      "U.S. District Judge William Young in Boston [finds] that the work undertaken by the group convened by Energy Secretary Chris Wright fell outside the strict mandates of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                                      The judge said he would discuss next steps in the case at a September 23 hearing.

                                      https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-climate-panel-not-exempt-transparency-requirements-judge-rules-2025-09-17/

                                      cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                        "U.S. District Judge William Young in Boston [finds] that the work undertaken by the group convened by Energy Secretary Chris Wright fell outside the strict mandates of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                                        The judge said he would discuss next steps in the case at a September 23 hearing.

                                        https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-climate-panel-not-exempt-transparency-requirements-judge-rules-2025-09-17/

                                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #27

                                        “The endangerment finding is the foundation for regulation of greenhouse gases at the federal level,” Field said. “It is not the government’s only tool for tackling climate change, but it is key to a balanced program with both carrots and sticks.”

                                        Here are five things to know about the endangerment finding.

                                        https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/09/endangerment-finding-epa-science-facts

                                        cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC cellomomoncars@mastodon.social

                                          “The endangerment finding is the foundation for regulation of greenhouse gases at the federal level,” Field said. “It is not the government’s only tool for tackling climate change, but it is key to a balanced program with both carrots and sticks.”

                                          Here are five things to know about the endangerment finding.

                                          https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/09/endangerment-finding-epa-science-facts

                                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.social
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #28

                                          There is still time to add public comment:

                                          "Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to the docket for this rule through September 22, 2025. There are several ways to provide written comments on the proposal, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0194:"

                                          https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/proposed-rule-reconsideration-2009-endangerment-finding#extension%20

                                          cellomomoncars@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper