Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Remember, kids:

Remember, kids:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
psaevolutionglobalwarmingdeadinternetthescience
26 Indlæg 16 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

    Remember, kids:

    In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

    It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

    This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

    #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #12

    @juergen_hubert not sure we're going to be able to fix the colloquial fubar of this one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

      @juergen_hubert
      Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
      It was a theory until last century.

      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #13

      @swoonie @juergen_hubert it was a *hypothesis*, now it is theory. that is exactly jürgen's point.

      swoonie@mastodon.ieS androcat@toot.catA 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

        Remember, kids:

        In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

        It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

        This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

        #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

        nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
        nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
        nini@oldbytes.space
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #14

        @juergen_hubert Probably too many syllables in that ten dollar word you got there, "theory" works the same don't it? /s

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

          @juergen_hubert
          Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
          It was a theory until last century.

          khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          khleedril@cyberplace.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #15

          @swoonie @juergen_hubert Yeh, this is the one example given in the OP that I wouldn't apply the word 'theory' to. It was conjecture at one time, maybe a hypothesis at some point, but it is a fact that global warming is happening, not a theory.

          There are theories I've heard that it is something to do with burning fossil fuels...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

            Remember, kids:

            In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

            It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

            This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

            #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

            drukac@mementomori.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            drukac@mementomori.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            drukac@mementomori.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #16

            @juergen_hubert
            Yes, but then we have things like terrain theory which...eesh.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

              @swoonie @juergen_hubert it was a *hypothesis*, now it is theory. that is exactly jürgen's point.

              swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
              swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
              swoonie@mastodon.ie
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #17

              @lritter @juergen_hubert
              It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
              We know this for sure. Period.

              juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                @juergen_hubert
                Climate scientist here. Global warming (or global heating rather) is an established fact by now.
                It was a theory until last century.

                mattesilver@101010.plM This user is from outside of this forum
                mattesilver@101010.plM This user is from outside of this forum
                mattesilver@101010.pl
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #18

                @swoonie

                the science is settled (tm)

                @juergen_hubert

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                  @lritter @juergen_hubert
                  It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
                  We know this for sure. Period.

                  juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  juergen_hubert@mementomori.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #19

                  @swoonie @lritter

                  And that's what makes it a scientific theory.

                  The "facts" are the observations. The "theory" is the tested explanation for those observations.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                    @lritter @juergen_hubert
                    It is *not* a theory. Climate science has worked intensely the past forty years, based on theory that was first formulated in the 19th century, that the observed global heating is caused mainly by the emissions from burning fossil fuels.
                    We know this for sure. Period.

                    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #20

                    @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                    > based on *a hypothesis* that was first formulated in the 19th century

                    fixed that for you.

                    to be even clearer this time: you use the word "theory" wrong, like many people and politicians do.

                    swoonie@mastodon.ieS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                      @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                      > based on *a hypothesis* that was first formulated in the 19th century

                      fixed that for you.

                      to be even clearer this time: you use the word "theory" wrong, like many people and politicians do.

                      swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                      swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                      swoonie@mastodon.ie
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #21

                      @lritter @juergen_hubert
                      If your use of the word “theory” confuses everyone, then it is a confusing use of this word and should be avoided.

                      Even if You Know You Are Right™.

                      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • swoonie@mastodon.ieS swoonie@mastodon.ie

                        @lritter @juergen_hubert
                        If your use of the word “theory” confuses everyone, then it is a confusing use of this word and should be avoided.

                        Even if You Know You Are Right™.

                        lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #22

                        @swoonie @juergen_hubert tomorrow it's going to hit a word that matters to you professionally, as punishment for what you just said.

                        swoonie@mastodon.ieS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                          @swoonie @juergen_hubert tomorrow it's going to hit a word that matters to you professionally, as punishment for what you just said.

                          swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                          swoonie@mastodon.ieS This user is from outside of this forum
                          swoonie@mastodon.ie
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #23

                          @lritter @juergen_hubert
                          Gotta get on with my day now, buddy.
                          Have a good one!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                            @swoonie @juergen_hubert it was a *hypothesis*, now it is theory. that is exactly jürgen's point.

                            androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                            androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                            androcat@toot.cat
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #24

                            @lritter

                            You can't observe a theory.

                            What we observe is facts.

                            The explanation we tack onto it is a theory.

                            Most of evolution is the facts. We can literally see evolution happening.
                            Those facts are not a theory, they're the bar any theory has to get over.

                            Climate change, likewise, is observable fact. And any theory of climate will have to incorporate those facts and explain them.

                            Does that clear it up?

                            @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                            lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • androcat@toot.catA androcat@toot.cat

                              @lritter

                              You can't observe a theory.

                              What we observe is facts.

                              The explanation we tack onto it is a theory.

                              Most of evolution is the facts. We can literally see evolution happening.
                              Those facts are not a theory, they're the bar any theory has to get over.

                              Climate change, likewise, is observable fact. And any theory of climate will have to incorporate those facts and explain them.

                              Does that clear it up?

                              @swoonie @juergen_hubert

                              lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #25

                              @androcat @swoonie @juergen_hubert in your words, what is the difference between hypothesis and theory?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                                Remember, kids:

                                In proper scientific terms, an attempt to explain observable phenomena is called a "hypothesis".

                                It is called a "theory" when it fits all the observable facts, and there is no observable evidence to the contrary. We don't call it a "truth" because there's always a chance that it might be overturned by later evidence - but as far as science is concerned, a "theory" is as hard as it gets.

                                This is often confusing to people who dismiss science they don't like as "it's just a theory". But this distinction should be kept in mind when discussing things like the "Theory of Evolution", "Theory of Relativity", "Global Warming Theory", and "Dead Internet Theory".

                                #PSA #Evolution #GlobalWarming #DeadInternetTheory #Science #Theory

                                malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                malte@radikal.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #26

                                @juergen_hubert Good reminder! One thing I'm missing from your description: Can you have competing scientific theories in your definition? I'm reminded of Kuhn's concept of paradigms which entails that there is always some conflicting evidence that any paradigm tends to dismiss (as noise, mistakes etc). Paradigms tend to shift when the conflicting evidence becomes overwhelming and a new theory manages to account for those previous exceptions.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Svar
                                • Svar som emne
                                Login for at svare
                                • Ældste til nyeste
                                • Nyeste til ældste
                                • Most Votes


                                • Log ind

                                • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Hjem
                                • Seneste
                                • Etiketter
                                • Populære
                                • Verden
                                • Bruger
                                • Grupper