Being anti-AI is part of being anti-fascist.
-
@StevenSaus the locally hosted models come from the same mechanism (stolen labor) and conception (white supremacist worship of the written word) as the commercial datacenter models. so, no, we're not blurring any distinction here. the technology does not get less fascist when you run it at home.
The analog here would be how frustrated you (and I!) get when people say socialism or communism or collective action is bad because of the USSR or China or Pol Pot.
-
Okay, that's your perspective. Cool. You seem to have a couple of fundamental assumptions I don't think I agree with in principle or in tone, and that's okay.
Like I told the other guy, I was offering why I didn't agree with the sentence as structured, since it seemed like he was surprised at that response. Not to argue or convince anyone else.
tone
maybe you should reconsider trying to tone-police people on this kinda thing. again, this is a facet of white supremacy culture, specifically right to comfort.
http://whitesupremacyculture.info for further details, though we suspect you'll disregard the suggestion
-
tone
maybe you should reconsider trying to tone-police people on this kinda thing. again, this is a facet of white supremacy culture, specifically right to comfort.
http://whitesupremacyculture.info for further details, though we suspect you'll disregard the suggestion
If you're hearing tone policing, that is unintended. I was answering what I perceived as someone asking for information honestly, and declared openly that was my sole intent.
Likewise, I'm not tone policing you, I'm saying that I am acknowledging and accepting that you see things differently than I do and that I am okay with that.
Nothing more or less. Please do not hear what I didn't say.
-
If you're hearing tone policing, that is unintended. I was answering what I perceived as someone asking for information honestly, and declared openly that was my sole intent.
Likewise, I'm not tone policing you, I'm saying that I am acknowledging and accepting that you see things differently than I do and that I am okay with that.
Nothing more or less. Please do not hear what I didn't say.
You seem to have a couple of fundamental assumptions I don't think I agree with in principle or in tone
this is literally tone policing, and saying "i'm sorry that you heard that but i didn't mean it" is not an apology. do better.
-
tone
maybe you should reconsider trying to tone-police people on this kinda thing. again, this is a facet of white supremacy culture, specifically right to comfort.
http://whitesupremacyculture.info for further details, though we suspect you'll disregard the suggestion
And thank you for the recommendation, by the way. I do appreciate the challenge to my beliefs, even if I don't always immediately agree. It's the only way I am aware of to remove my own upbringing in this patriarchal racist culture.
Tone: genuine; I'm reading now.
-
You seem to have a couple of fundamental assumptions I don't think I agree with in principle or in tone
this is literally tone policing, and saying "i'm sorry that you heard that but i didn't mean it" is not an apology. do better.
"If" -> this isn't realtime, I'm having to assume your reaction; this is just a conditional if/then/else.
"You seem to" -> I am not going to tell you what you're thinking, only how it came across to me, as information.
I am sorry that I came across as tone policing.
It was not intended. That does not change the first sentence. It does signal that it was not malicious.
I will own the effect, absolutely. I'm not going to say that it was intentional when it was not.
-
P pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
