Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement.

I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
48 Indlæg 26 Posters 139 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

    I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement. If you’re a somebody, the platform laps it up.

    But on Mastodon the conversation flows irrespective of who you are.

    I know where I’d rather be https://fediscience.org/@kathhayhoe/116065653289142235

    wesley@theatl.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
    wesley@theatl.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
    wesley@theatl.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #41

    @urlyman I hop between Mastodon and Bluesky. Personally I find value in them both.

    There are a lot more big accounts posting on Bluesky, but I enjoy the slower paced more community-based interactions of Mastodon. I also like that Mastodon allows for a lot more nuance with larger character limits even getting into more long form posts (such as the OP which is fairly long and would have been a lengthy thread on bsky) which makes for better discussions.

    In my experience Bluesky is better for low-effort short posts and broadcasting from large accounts to a wider audience whereas Mastodon is better for nuanced discussions and has a more level playing field between large and small accounts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

      I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement. If you’re a somebody, the platform laps it up.

      But on Mastodon the conversation flows irrespective of who you are.

      I know where I’d rather be https://fediscience.org/@kathhayhoe/116065653289142235

      el_coyote@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      el_coyote@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      el_coyote@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #42

      @urlyman I was in BlueSky for a while too…. but it’s too political, and also quite discriminative of single fathers. If you have NO political opinion there, you’re a nobody, who nobody trusts. You’re considered a “red flag” if you don’t support the left. Other platforms consider you a “red flag “ if you don’t support the right.

      I love the Fediverse! It gives the finger to both.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

        I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement. If you’re a somebody, the platform laps it up.

        But on Mastodon the conversation flows irrespective of who you are.

        I know where I’d rather be https://fediscience.org/@kathhayhoe/116065653289142235

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        mycos@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #43

        @urlyman Really? That's interesting, as I'm trying out Mastodon and coming from Bluesky, I interact with people frequently there. Yet, I only have 20-something followers, none of whom know me IRL.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

          I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement. If you’re a somebody, the platform laps it up.

          But on Mastodon the conversation flows irrespective of who you are.

          I know where I’d rather be https://fediscience.org/@kathhayhoe/116065653289142235

          dodo1095zd@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dodo1095zd@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dodo1095zd@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #44

          @urlyman používám obojí, chce to jen čas...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • hydropsyche@ecoevo.socialH hydropsyche@ecoevo.social

            @urlyman I am a woman scientist. Reply guys are everywhere. At least on Mastodon, it's easy to add a personal note on their profile the first time they're obnoxious, and then block them the second time. And if they really cross the line, report them to their server and they actually face consequences.

            kotking@blorbo.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kotking@blorbo.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kotking@blorbo.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #45

            @hydropsyche @urlyman
            Considering myself as reply guy as I only get ideas from other messages rather than shouting in void. Personal note is not talked about a lot which also might mean people never use it which as you pointed out, can give first time warning for your future self how to deal with x person instead of relying on memory.

            Never found twitter usefulness so never was attached personally myself, moved from reddit to Mastodon and then explored whole Fediverse and found it attractive.
            Bluesky showing up late also was factor of "why bother, Fediverse not perfect but I like the appeal for growth".

            What really concerning for me, that academic side didn't lean on Fediverse being in between closed spaces (twitter/Bluesky) and going anonymous comments. Self published blog with ActivityPub regardless of jankiness still a good opportunity to have people interact with your content while having history behind accounts, as well relieving burden of registration/holding account information/dealing with bot network registration and having semi anonymous data gathering.

            We all part of algorithm be it twitter, Bluesky or google for independent blogs, so why bother with combination of social media+ Google when you can only appeal to Google + Fediverse instead?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social

              @urlyman bsky feels mostly "libertarian/status quo" to me, while masto leans more towards "socialist/anarchic" (with the pinch of salt of "it'll depend on who you follow" etc of course)

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              mycos@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #46

              @patrick_h_lauke @urlyman It's funny because I see it flipped on Bluesky. Everyone is calling Mastodon a Libertarian or Centrists hub while calling themselves Leftist, Socialists, or Anarchists. I don't have much to add for/against either line of thinking, but figured I'd bring it up as it's interesting.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • paninid@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                paninid@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                paninid@mastodon.world
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #47

                @Lydie @urlyman

                https://inaniludibrio.com/2024/02/13/mastodon-is-for-old-school-neophiles/

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gooba42@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #48

                  @Lydie @urlyman I really liked the idea of pluggable Open Source algorithms.

                  The problem isn't *an* algorithm, it's whether you have control of it. Even chronological display is an algorithm, it's just one that's well understood.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tokeriis@helvede.netT tokeriis@helvede.net shared this topic
                  Svar
                  • Svar som emne
                  Login for at svare
                  • Ældste til nyeste
                  • Nyeste til ældste
                  • Most Votes


                  • Log ind

                  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  Graciously hosted by data.coop
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Hjem
                  • Seneste
                  • Etiketter
                  • Populære
                  • Verden
                  • Bruger
                  • Grupper