Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
219 Indlæg 163 Posters 7 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

    brood@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
    brood@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
    brood@mas.to
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #143

    @sundogplanets
    holy fuck. * groan *

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.socialF fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.social

      @CStamp @sundogplanets They don't. Anyone can shoot anything into space if they can afford it. No one governs space. What he needs is permission to use the air waves. The section is highlighted in the attached image.

      I am not defending him (I think he is a giant child molesting, aspie supremacist, queef) I just thought that in this current era of disinfo someone should step in an clear up things.

      cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cstamp@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #144

      @fiend_unpleasant @sundogplanets that doesn’t mean it’s not wrong. They are possibly damaging our atmosphere, they ARE ruining our night sky, they are increasing risk of damage to people when they fall out of the sky, they are risking damage to flights beyond our atmosphere…

      That one government has the right to speak for all of us is crap.

      fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • iamlayer8@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        iamlayer8@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        iamlayer8@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #145

        @Pepijn
        Which step exactly is the one where #magicHappens?

        @sundogplanets

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jackemled@furry.engineerJ jackemled@furry.engineer

          @sundogplanets I suggest we all become amateur radio astronomers but instead of receiving we transmit. We agree on a satellite to fry every day until starlink costs too much to keep running.

          Obviously we can't do this. Not everyone can afford a radio transmission setup & a satellite antenna, & the FCC in the USA & the equivalents in other countries would be very mad, but I wish we could do this.

          fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #146

          @jackemled @sundogplanets Oh we CAN do this and yes the FCC in the USA & the equivalents in other countries would be VERY mad.

          I'm not far enough in my ham radio journey to help much in the procurement of Ka band equipment but I figure with enough hours of watching https://www.youtube.com/@saveitforparts someone should be able to figure out how to get the good stuff cheap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

            2rad0@defcon.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
            2rad0@defcon.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
            2rad0@defcon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #147

            @sundogplanets

            I don't know if that can be profitable, they have to convince a lot of suckers to pay a premium price for an inferior non-wired internet connection. Each node is deorbited every 5 years or so, so that's 200,000 nodes being turned into a dumpster fire and crashing back to earth each year. say each costs $1,000, then it's a billion in overhead they throw away just to repopulate the mesh hardware every 5 years, ignoring the even more critical launch, operations, and insurance costs, I suspect hardware costs are well over $1,000 per node, but I can't find any real numbers to base this on.

            The bigger problem though is why TF are phone companies even entertaining the idea of participating in the creation of a new competitor that could easily turn into a monopoly and crush them?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

              iamlayer8@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              iamlayer8@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              iamlayer8@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #148

              @sundogplanets
              My only thought: externalities

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL This user is from outside of this forum
                legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL This user is from outside of this forum
                legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.al
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #149

                @Kiloku @sundogplanets The Kardashev scale is meaningless drivel. It's just some dude making shit up in the 1960s to get government funding from the Soviets. Anyone who references the scale like it's meaningful, ESPECIALLY in an official filing, is not a serious person.

                All of these tech idiots need to be bullied aggressively until they go away. We need to locate that idiot from Pretoria's childhood bullies and get some historical data to kick things off.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                  https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                  kaievans@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kaievans@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kaievans@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #150

                  @sundogplanets I kind of think the project is cool as fuck and makes a ton of sense. Fuck that guy obviously

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                    emily_s@mastodon.me.ukE This user is from outside of this forum
                    emily_s@mastodon.me.ukE This user is from outside of this forum
                    emily_s@mastodon.me.uk
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #151

                    @sundogplanets 30x more satellites than objects that we are currently tracking in orbit? (Including debris from stuff that blew or was blown up)

                    One company?

                    Well that's fucking ridiculous.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstamp@mastodon.socialC cstamp@mastodon.social

                      @fiend_unpleasant @sundogplanets that doesn’t mean it’s not wrong. They are possibly damaging our atmosphere, they ARE ruining our night sky, they are increasing risk of damage to people when they fall out of the sky, they are risking damage to flights beyond our atmosphere…

                      That one government has the right to speak for all of us is crap.

                      fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #152

                      @CStamp @sundogplanets I'm sorry I thought calling Elon Musk a giant child molesting, aspie supremacist, queef would have conveyed that I think he is wrong to do this.

                      It's important to be factual when we are trying to stop shit heads from doing shit head things so they can't argue back.

                      How do you think they could damage the atmosphere? And again the US government has jurisdiction over the Ka band in the US, not space. Anyone could decide they hate the new satellites and shoot them down.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                        THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                        oisin@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                        oisin@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                        oisin@mastodon.ie
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #153

                        @sundogplanets WHAT on earth are they going on about, they are like 12 year old boys

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                          los0220@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          los0220@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          los0220@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #154

                          @sundogplanets At this point I'm quite sure they're deliberately trying to cause a Kessler syndrome, so we could never escape the hell billionaires are going to lay upon us.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                            https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                            earl@mast.john1126.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                            earl@mast.john1126.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                            earl@mast.john1126.com
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #155

                            @sundogplanets

                            Do you see the red laser making a giant letter X?

                            This is a frame of video from "Attack on Skynet base ⧹ T800 Arrival | Terminator Genisys".

                            You're only "dead" if you reject God's offer of eternal life through the Lord Jesus Christ, who died on a cross. Follow Him and live.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                              reiddragon@fedi.catto.gardenR This user is from outside of this forum
                              reiddragon@fedi.catto.gardenR This user is from outside of this forum
                              reiddragon@fedi.catto.garden
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #156
                              @sundogplanets oh this surely won't render the planet's orbit unusable for generations, no way.

                              But also, are you surprised one bit? This is the company that sent a car in space for the lolz
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                mtor@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mtor@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mtor@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #157

                                @sundogplanets We aren’t even a Level 1 civilization. Also, this shows their complete lack of understanding of what that scale actually means.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                  https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                  landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #158

                                  @sundogplanets I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong with that. Completely risk free with no drawbacks whatsoever.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM michael_w_busch@mastodon.online

                                    @zgryphon @sundogplanets

                                    The radio astronomer Nikolai Kardashev developed a scale describing hypothetical aliens by the amount of energy they used as a guide for what SETI searches could and could not find.

                                    A "Kardashev II" level would involve using the entire energy output of the Sun by dismantling planets and turning them into solar panels.

                                    Which has no resemblance to this particular bit of vaporware.

                                    zgryphon@gweep.catZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zgryphon@gweep.catZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zgryphon@gweep.cat
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #159

                                    @michael_w_busch @sundogplanets Trust techbros not only to envision littering on a cosmic scale, but also to equate it with a theoretical hallmark of a hyperadvanced civilization.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ zakalwe@plasmatrap.com

                                      @GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai @sundogplanets@mastodon.social Hint: Ask yourself why datacenters use massive bundles of wired or fiber connections internally rather than WiFi.

                                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #160

                                      @zakalwe @sundogplanets

                                      🤔 🤪

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ids1024@mathstodon.xyzI ids1024@mathstodon.xyz

                                        @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Plus the big question of how you cool a GPU datacenter surrounded by the vacuum of space.

                                        But then, you probably don't really need to know anything about datacenters to realize that moving them into space is just going to make every aspect of them more difficult and expensive...

                                        michaelgemar@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        michaelgemar@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        michaelgemar@mstdn.ca
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #161

                                        @ids1024 @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Exactly. The cooling issue alone should rule out space for data centres.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ppulfer@mastodon.ieP ppulfer@mastodon.ie

                                          @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets, my thoughts are on the biggest resource consumption of a datacenter: Cooling and Energy, which is very taxing right now on our existing capabilities.

                                          We'd shift from constant CO2 emitting energy consumption on earth to solar in space and move away from using fresh water for cooling, which is becoming more and more scarce.

                                          davidbcohen@twit.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davidbcohen@twit.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davidbcohen@twit.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #162

                                          @ppulfer @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets Yeah, Elon might get away with ignoring laws here on Earth but you can’t do that with the laws of physics. Space is not full of magical infinite solar energy or cooling.

                                          This is just a grift to keep the investment for his companies flowing in.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper