Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
219 Indlæg 163 Posters 7 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

    agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    agowa338@chaos.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #187

    @sundogplanets

    Tbh, it is time to find a way to remove junk like SpaceX satellites from orbit without blowing them up with a ballistic missile. Aka. we need a way to free up the sky again or we'll just be stranded down here and not even be able to see the stars anymore...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • palmandneedle@norden.socialP palmandneedle@norden.social

      @deborahh @sundogplanets long at times. And kinda weirdly chunked up. But enjoyable

      realgene@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
      realgene@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
      realgene@hachyderm.io
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #188

      @PalmAndNeedle @deborahh @sundogplanets
      A two-volume bilogy, but his publisher said "nah, squeeze it into one, who cares if you rush the ending."

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • merovius@chaos.socialM merovius@chaos.social

        @sundogplanets @robpike lol data centers in space what a publicity stunt. Makes absolutely zero material sense.

        neia@zoner.workN This user is from outside of this forum
        neia@zoner.workN This user is from outside of this forum
        neia@zoner.work
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #189

        @Merovius@chaos.social @sundogplanets@mastodon.social @robpike@hachyderm.io I like the idea of a datacenter where the heat budget is impossibly strict, nobody can replace failing hardware, the geolocation changes radically every minute, and there's a good chance it collides with a loose screw going at 2km/s.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

          kierkegaanks@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
          kierkegaanks@beige.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
          kierkegaanks@beige.party
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #190

          @sundogplanets not to mention that they can’t cool serious datacenters in space… so what are they really?

          tartley@fosstodon.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • irina@critter.cafeI irina@critter.cafe

            @the_wub @sundogplanets spacex already deploys 20-60 satellites per launch - and this is the same delusional management who think they can turn around launches in a day or less, so the bottleneck would (in their eyes) be building the satellites themselves

            the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            the_wub@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #191

            @irina @sundogplanets Hmmm. So, thinking selfishly it could theoretically happen within my lifetime.

            In the back of my mind is this kind of thing, as drawn to my attention some time ago by the esteemed professor themselves:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_gun

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

              c_dan4th@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              c_dan4th@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              c_dan4th@mstdn.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #192

              @sundogplanets Surely someone has done the math here: roughly 10^1.5 satellites per launch. Roughly 10^2 launches per year. Average satellite lifetime of (optimistically) 10^1 years… Is 10^6 satellites even possible? (never mind orbital intersections, etc.)

              c_dan4th@mstdn.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • kierkegaanks@beige.partyK kierkegaanks@beige.party

                @sundogplanets not to mention that they can’t cool serious datacenters in space… so what are they really?

                tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                tartley@fosstodon.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #193

                @Kierkegaanks @sundogplanets it's whatever is so ambitious that no investor can figure out it's unrealistic until it has successfully propped up the share price until the next one

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                  https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                  pamela1960@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pamela1960@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pamela1960@kolektiva.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #194

                  @sundogplanets Countries need to start banning satellites above their near space, and either jamming them or destroying them if not moved.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                    edelruth@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                    edelruth@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                    edelruth@mastodon.online
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #195

                    @sundogplanets

                    🎶🎵 It's raining not-men-but-satellites 🎵🎶

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                      crystal_fish_caves@mstdn.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
                      crystal_fish_caves@mstdn.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
                      crystal_fish_caves@mstdn.party
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #196

                      @sundogplanets rogue asteroids no longer need to fear being detected and intercepted, or have Bruce Willis land and destroy them. We will never see them coming through the cloud of billionaire supported space junk in the way.

                      Time travel must not be possible or someone would have come back to us 100 years ago and thwarted the system that lets some have BILLIONS while others live on the street.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                        https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                        alphapuggle@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        alphapuggle@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        alphapuggle@infosec.exchange
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #197

                        @sundogplanets I swear if we lose our night sky for *AI* I'm going to lose it

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • irina@critter.cafeI irina@critter.cafe

                          @the_wub @sundogplanets spacex already deploys 20-60 satellites per launch - and this is the same delusional management who think they can turn around launches in a day or less, so the bottleneck would (in their eyes) be building the satellites themselves

                          alisonw@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                          alisonw@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                          alisonw@hachyderm.io
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #198

                          @irina @the_wub @sundogplanets
                          But we already know - what goes up *will* come down (and in an unknown and uncontrolled manner too).

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                            Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                            zl2tod@mastodon.onlineZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zl2tod@mastodon.onlineZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zl2tod@mastodon.online
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #199

                            @sundogplanets

                            Where does the FCC get off in thinking it can make decisions that affect the entire planet and all humankind?

                            There's a tui in the tree outside loudly proclaiming "Ripe Plums".

                            @adambecker.bsky.social

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ohmu@social.seattle.wa.usO This user is from outside of this forum
                              ohmu@social.seattle.wa.usO This user is from outside of this forum
                              ohmu@social.seattle.wa.us
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #200

                              @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets
                              Giant silly putty katamaris ... in space!

                              kwayk42@sechtor.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • c_dan4th@mstdn.socialC c_dan4th@mstdn.social

                                @sundogplanets Surely someone has done the math here: roughly 10^1.5 satellites per launch. Roughly 10^2 launches per year. Average satellite lifetime of (optimistically) 10^1 years… Is 10^6 satellites even possible? (never mind orbital intersections, etc.)

                                c_dan4th@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                c_dan4th@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                c_dan4th@mstdn.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #201

                                @sundogplanets Just doing this math says there’s a maximum of 30,000 operational Starlinks at any given time unless they’re ramping up to way more launches/year, more satellites/launch, or less shitty satellites. None of these seems super likely.

                                lcwheeler@ecoevo.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • c_dan4th@mstdn.socialC c_dan4th@mstdn.social

                                  @sundogplanets Just doing this math says there’s a maximum of 30,000 operational Starlinks at any given time unless they’re ramping up to way more launches/year, more satellites/launch, or less shitty satellites. None of these seems super likely.

                                  lcwheeler@ecoevo.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lcwheeler@ecoevo.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lcwheeler@ecoevo.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #202

                                  @c_dan4th @sundogplanets

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ohmu@social.seattle.wa.usO ohmu@social.seattle.wa.us

                                    @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets
                                    Giant silly putty katamaris ... in space!

                                    kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kwayk42@sechtor.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kwayk42@sechtor.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #203

                                    @ohmu @dougwade @sundogplanets

                                    KATAMARI DAMACI

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                      azuaron@cyberpunk.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      azuaron@cyberpunk.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      azuaron@cyberpunk.lol
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #204

                                      @sundogplanets I am not an astronaut, but it was my understanding one of the biggest problems in space was radiating waste heat.

                                      I am a computer engineer, and I definitely know one of the biggest problems of data centers is that they generate a lot of waste heat.

                                      Sending ONE satellite into space to be a data center would be the stupidest idea I'd heard all week.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                        https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                        kaito02@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kaito02@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kaito02@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #205

                                        @sundogplanets somebody stop this nonsense. This will irreversibly deprive our species of land astronomy and the chance of ever leaving this planet.

                                        Maybe the reason why there aren't any aliens is because they all have Elons.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • isaackuo@spacey.spaceI isaackuo@spacey.space

                                          @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social I have three non-techbro mentality/religion reasons for this:

                                          1) Distract from Tesla's poor earnings
                                          2) Distract from the Epstein files
                                          3) Bezos says he's going to launch zillions of data center satellites so Musk just wants to nab scamee money for it first

                                          But yeah, also Musk is a moron.

                                          edelruth@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          edelruth@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          edelruth@mastodon.online
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #206

                                          @isaackuo @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy

                                          Less of a moron if he's just going for the money grab, and could not care less about the planet. Which is the version of Musk that my brain envisions.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper