Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
219 Indlæg 163 Posters 7 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • palmandneedle@norden.socialP palmandneedle@norden.social

    @sundogplanets I do feel like we're on the path to Neil Stephenson's Seven Eves somehow

    deborahh@cosocial.caD This user is from outside of this forum
    deborahh@cosocial.caD This user is from outside of this forum
    deborahh@cosocial.ca
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #60

    @PalmAndNeedle @sundogplanets I think I've read that, ages ago. Time for a reread, maybe! My library has it online.

    palmandneedle@norden.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #61

      @sundogplanets

      If you understand anything about the giant CF of data centers right now this is just the stupidest idea ever.

      First, the lifespan of these chips runs on the order of 18 months before they are considered obsolete and the chips fry very quickly so there is a very high failure rate.

      Also, the data centers power is determined by the networking of all the components in the data center.

      Ask yourself if RF communication broadcast between satellites can work like wires

      ids1024@mathstodon.xyzI zakalwe@plasmatrap.comZ 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

        THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #62

        @sundogplanets

        Well, yeah, the idea of just you know oh we’re going to now reach this science fiction milestone because reasons.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • w6kme@mastodon.radioW w6kme@mastodon.radio

          @sundogplanets The night sky will be spectacular for several decades as all the smashed bits fall back to Earth.

          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #63

          @W6KME @sundogplanets

          Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

          w6kme@mastodon.radioW clintruin@mastodon.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

            THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

            jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jplebreton@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #64

            @sundogplanets the performance of total seriousness, no matter how absurd the goal, is critical to tech oligarchs' "fake it til you rule the world" strategy. it rarely survives contact with reality but the damage it does is of course very real.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

              THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              agreeable_landfall@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #65

              @sundogplanets Sounds like they used AI to generate this. The Kardashev scale is a classification of _civilization_, not "situation". I see this sort of auto-correct in lots of AI slop.

              Recent news articles kept referring to Tom Human as the Border Guard.

              If this wasn't so serious, I'd laugh.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                @W6KME @sundogplanets

                Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

                w6kme@mastodon.radioW This user is from outside of this forum
                w6kme@mastodon.radioW This user is from outside of this forum
                w6kme@mastodon.radio
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #66

                @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets SpaceX's unwillingness to be good citizens, and the US government's unwillingness to do anything about it...people are going to die eventually, and possibly a lot of them.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                  https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #67

                  @sundogplanets

                  What people should suggest is that Elon Musk personally move himself into space to oversee the development of his glorious satellite network.

                  By all means, we should hurry him to the asteroid belt personally so he can collect the raw materials and then fashion the satellites. Tell him it will cut launch cost costs.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #68

                    @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets

                    A rail gun is completely unnecessary. As a scientist pointed out back in the good old Ronnie Reagan, Star Wars days. The way you defeat a network of satellites is to throw a bucket of sand into the right orbit.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                      @W6KME @sundogplanets

                      Just so long as you remember to dodge them. The fireworks SpaceX provided last year over the Caribbean did endanger commercial flights. Now it would be brought everywhere on the planet.

                      clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      clintruin@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #69

                      @GhostOnTheHalfShell @W6KME @sundogplanets
                      Let's remember who we're talking about here...
                      ☠️
                      https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog/115989156933538439

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                        Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                        benjaminklein@mastodon.nuB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benjaminklein@mastodon.nuB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benjaminklein@mastodon.nu
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #70

                        @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social brilliant book and well worth the read. Every time I hear someone mentioning one of these tech bros being intelligent I want a copy to throw at their head. Maybe we need to start explaining to politicians that if LEO is a shooting gallery it means no more GPS, do they remember what it was like navigating the world with paper maps, because we are going back there.

                        ericfielding@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafeT teajaygrey@snac.bsd.cafe
                          I noticed in the credits of re-watching the 4K remastering of Hard Boiled that there was some security company called Starlink, decades ago. fElon Musk couldn't even pick a name that hadn't already been used before.

                          IMHO, it would probably be cheaper to run fiber to the home, even in the most remote rural areas, than to pollute our skies with satellites for high latency Internet access. But, what do I know? I think last time I checked a 50km spool of single mode fiber could be bought for under $1000.
                          ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                          ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                          ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #71

                          @teajaygrey @sundogplanets the cost of the fibre link is not mainly about the physical cable. The thing that takes time and money is getting permits for digging up roads, access through private fields, planning permission for connection points, and so on. And each new route of cable has to have this sorted from scratch, and some public authorities are slow, obstructive or just downright awkward.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                            https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                            netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            netraven@hear-me.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #72

                            @sundogplanets I’m (jokingly) pretty sure aliens are behind this stupidity. Why else would we be purposely stranding ourselves on this planet by filling up the sky with space junk?

                            Oh right, because we can…

                            Times like these I like to disassociate much more hilarious reasons than what reality actually offers, as to why things they way they are. Today it’s aliens, tomorrow? Tardigrades maybe.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                              THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                              netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              netraven@hear-me.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #73

                              @sundogplanets god damn cardassians!!!!! /s

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jakebrake@ohai.socialJ jakebrake@ohai.social

                                @sundogplanets

                                Bezos: Oh yeah? Well AWS will put TWO million data centers in orbit!

                                China: Let 5 million space data centers bloom!

                                Musk: Well, then SpaceX will put TEN million centers in orbit!

                                Bezos: Fine! ELEVENTY million AWS centers!

                                Musk: Hah! TWELVETY million SpaceX centers! Each with a cool robot!

                                Bezos: Meh-meh-meh-robot-meh. Amazon has robots.

                                Musk: But not COOL robots.

                                m0khr@mastodon.radioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                m0khr@mastodon.radioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                m0khr@mastodon.radio
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #74

                                @jakebrake @sundogplanets
                                Cool 'robots' that are just remote waldos...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                  https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                  oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  oliver_schafeld@mastodon.online
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #75

                                  Dieser neuerliche SpaceX/Musk-Blödsinn wird sachlich zerlegt in diesem Astro-Blog

                                  https://www.bernd-leitenberger.de/blog/2026/01/27/musks-ki-rechenzentren-im-orbit/#more-18511

                                  Liest sich nicht immer flüssig, wirkt aber sachlich fundiert.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bashstkid@mastodon.online
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #76

                                    @Pepijn @sundogplanets Only if Step 2 involves a knife missiile.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • deborahh@cosocial.caD deborahh@cosocial.ca

                                      @PalmAndNeedle @sundogplanets I think I've read that, ages ago. Time for a reread, maybe! My library has it online.

                                      palmandneedle@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      palmandneedle@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      palmandneedle@norden.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #77

                                      @deborahh @sundogplanets long at times. And kinda weirdly chunked up. But enjoyable

                                      bthalpin@mastodon.socialB realgene@hachyderm.ioR 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                        https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                        oneiros@ruhr.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        oneiros@ruhr.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        oneiros@ruhr.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #78

                                        @sundogplanets
                                        All in sun synchronous orbit? 🤡

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • kwayk42@sechtor.socialK kwayk42@sechtor.social

                                          @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                                          #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          shadsterling@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #79

                                          @kwayk42 @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets for me, watching the fireballs as they burn up in reentry as the spacecraft that is the net fires its thrusters to take them down, would be more satisfying than smashing them to hazardous bits still in orbit.

                                          (The pollution from the reentry isn’t great, but the smashed bits would reenter eventually anyway, so it’s the same pollution with different timing)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper