The Onion has an AI policy.

[theonedoc@tech.lgbt]

@jalefkowit I only doslike that they limit it to "creative".

That garbage needs to be banned IN ALL roles.

[clintonanderson@universeodon.com]

@jalefkowit

#FuckAI

[david_chisnall@infosec.exchange]

@jalefkowit I don't really like this because 'an existential threat to the livelihood of creative professionals' can be read to mean that bullshit generators could actually substitute for the writers of The Onion. I'd much rather that they either omitted this part or explained it in a way that doesn't make that implication.

[johnniemac@mastodon.scot]

@jalefkowit unless it is also satire…

[lumi@snug.moe]

@lxskllr @jalefkowit i disagree, it still makes a statement that genai is not ok for code

[solitha@mastodon.social]

@Em0nM4stodon Yeah I'd much rather be reluctantly acknowledged by companies with principles like this, than all the alternatives we currently face.

@jalefkowit

[farooqkz@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

@jalefkowit

Well actually if a human can be replaced by AI, this probably means the human hasn't got a valuable skill.

I can say no AI can replace me to write the code I write, the blog posts I write, and the books I'm going to write.

This also true about many artists.

However, not many understand value of a good writing/art/code/video. Fewer who can tell if it's a good and creative one by looking at it.

So this is the real problem not just AI. But also the people who don't understand.

[mle_online@social.afront.org]

@jalefkowit If only I could get the community theater to adopt a policy like this

[guillotine_jones@beige.party]

@jalefkowit
The Onion announces policy of not using Ai-generated content.
Bong hits 4 The Onion.

[jgrg@mstdn.science]

@david_chisnall @jalefkowit Which prompts the question in my mind: has an AI ever written something funny?

[alienghic@timeloop.cafe]

@MLE_online @jalefkowit

I bet showing them the onions policy makes it more likely they'll adopt something similar. A lot of people prefer making decisions by copying someone they respect's answers.

[tedmielczarek@mastodon.social]

@david_chisnall @jalefkowit as we've seen in the current state of the world, LLMs do not need to be *good* in order to harm entire industries. There's a lot of slop out there taking up space that human creativity used to fill.

[mle_online@social.afront.org]

@alienghic @jalefkowit I bet not. But I am going to keep being really annoying about this. I will send them everything I stumble upon like this, and I will bring it up at every board meeting until we do something

[lemgandi@mastodon.social]

@jalefkowit

I am a subscriber. They are Good People.

[hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com]

"if a human can be replaced by AI" is load-bearing here, and is mostly a marketing position from AI companies.

Additionally, every human creative endeavor is worthwhile, no matter the output's quality, which is arguably subjective. Generative AI just doesn't have a good place in human society.

[mimsybean@mastodon.social]

@jalefkowit Excellent news!!

[aud@fire.asta.lgbt]

@MLE_online@social.afront.org @jalefkowit@hachyderm.io I... a community theater that wants to use generative ML??

that is... depressing

[mle_online@social.afront.org]

@aud @jalefkowit Unfortunately, we've had some set designers who are very lazy (and lacking in talent) who have used AI in their sets. As a board member, I've been pushing us to come up with a policy. Some of the board members are on my side, but others are just too credulous and are completely wowed by the magic box. They don't want to agree to a policy that would cut off access to a miraculous tool

[argentcorvid@mstdn.social]

@Mae @jalefkowit yeah, Roger Rabbit /toon "but only if it's funny"

[reflex@retrogaming.social]

@jalefkvowit@hachyderm.io This is how you do an #AI #policy