Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. So, technology promoted by the asocial broligarchy (as Carole Cadwalladr calls them) is itself asocial & seems to be happy to ignore or even contradict commands from humans.

So, technology promoted by the asocial broligarchy (as Carole Cadwalladr calls them) is itself asocial & seems to be happy to ignore or even contradict commands from humans.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
technology
3 Indlæg 2 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
    chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
    chrismayla6@zirk.us
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    So, technology promoted by the asocial broligarchy (as Carole Cadwalladr calls them) is itself asocial & seems to be happy to ignore or even contradict commands from humans.

    Quite apart from the ethical & privacy issues this might raise... it also starts looking like the first stages on the road to SkyNet (the ant-human intelligent AI from the Terminator series of films)... we may not be there yet, but when we look bak was this the first inkling?

    #AI #technology
    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/27/number-of-ai-chatbots-ignoring-human-instructions-increasing-study-says

    mark_f_lynch@mastodon.ieM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

      So, technology promoted by the asocial broligarchy (as Carole Cadwalladr calls them) is itself asocial & seems to be happy to ignore or even contradict commands from humans.

      Quite apart from the ethical & privacy issues this might raise... it also starts looking like the first stages on the road to SkyNet (the ant-human intelligent AI from the Terminator series of films)... we may not be there yet, but when we look bak was this the first inkling?

      #AI #technology
      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/27/number-of-ai-chatbots-ignoring-human-instructions-increasing-study-says

      mark_f_lynch@mastodon.ieM This user is from outside of this forum
      mark_f_lynch@mastodon.ieM This user is from outside of this forum
      mark_f_lynch@mastodon.ie
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @ChrisMayLA6 No. No it really isn’t. Every article like this is attributing agency where there is none. An LLM “agent” can no more “disobey” instructions than it can “obey” them. What it does is generate responses and instructions for actions which are statistically likely to be a response to whatever instruction was given. Sometimes that will look like obedience and others not. There is no conscious choice made to obey or not, because there’s no consciousness there

      chrismayla6@zirk.usC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mark_f_lynch@mastodon.ieM mark_f_lynch@mastodon.ie

        @ChrisMayLA6 No. No it really isn’t. Every article like this is attributing agency where there is none. An LLM “agent” can no more “disobey” instructions than it can “obey” them. What it does is generate responses and instructions for actions which are statistically likely to be a response to whatever instruction was given. Sometimes that will look like obedience and others not. There is no conscious choice made to obey or not, because there’s no consciousness there

        chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
        chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
        chrismayla6@zirk.us
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @mark_f_lynch

        Ha ha, yes I can see that; which is why I said 'first stages.... but yes I know they're not conscious so in that sense using the words 'ignore' & 'contradict' was a bit of sleight of hand by me... for which I apologies. But the overall issue is I think live if not yet anywhere near any quasi-consciousness....

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
        Svar
        • Svar som emne
        Login for at svare
        • Ældste til nyeste
        • Nyeste til ældste
        • Most Votes


        • Log ind

        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        Graciously hosted by data.coop
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Hjem
        • Seneste
        • Etiketter
        • Populære
        • Verden
        • Bruger
        • Grupper