Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
48 Indlæg 45 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

    Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

    gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
    gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
    gudenau@hachyderm.io
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #37

    @tinker I mean that's not wrong.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

      Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

      tipjip@bonn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tipjip@bonn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tipjip@bonn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #38

      @tinker
      Would they be wrong, though?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

        Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

        cjust@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cjust@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        cjust@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #39

        @tinker

        <archaeologist voice>
        these were built every year and tossed into the shores of Lake Superior in a solumn ceremony in order to appease to their deity named Edmund Fitzgerald.
        </archaeologist voice>

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

          Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

          stellar@mk.absturztau.beS This user is from outside of this forum
          stellar@mk.absturztau.beS This user is from outside of this forum
          stellar@mk.absturztau.be
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #40

          @tinker@infosec.exchange ritual yes

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

            @tinker

            I think you might have just solved the Roman Dodecahedron mystery 😂

            It's a Roman 3D Printer Test!

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

            cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
            cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
            cinebox@masto.hackers.town
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #41

            @simonzerafa @tinker one theory is that it was a showpiece for metal workers to show off their abilities so you might not be far off.

            simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cinebox@masto.hackers.townC cinebox@masto.hackers.town

              @simonzerafa @tinker one theory is that it was a showpiece for metal workers to show off their abilities so you might not be far off.

              simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
              simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
              simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #42

              @cinebox @tinker

              An apprentice piece, possibly for metal casting.
              Could be! 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                meraord@mastodonsweden.seM This user is from outside of this forum
                meraord@mastodonsweden.seM This user is from outside of this forum
                meraord@mastodonsweden.se
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #43

                @tinker "...but we don't know why. Okay?"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                  Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                  balu@muenster.imB This user is from outside of this forum
                  balu@muenster.imB This user is from outside of this forum
                  balu@muenster.im
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #44

                  @tinker "likely"?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                    Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                    canuckduff@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                    canuckduff@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                    canuckduff@mas.to
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #45

                    @tinker Clearly, high-status people were buried with such objects to ensure access to their analogue in the afterlife.

                    Edited to add: In the time before cheap data, one of my waiting for bus activities was guessing what would survive of my belongings & surroundings if we were, say, buried in ash suddenly. What would future archeologists guess?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                      Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                      stgiga@blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stgiga@blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stgiga@blahaj.zone
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #46

                      @tinker@infosec.exchange

                      I'd think
                      https://stgiga.github.io/gigaware/mewbust2.stl would in its several copies make my house in 1000 years look holy.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                        Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                        urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                        urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                        urban_hermit@mstdn.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #47

                        @tinker
                        Archeologists in the now:

                        (Old archeologists) The people of this archipelago were primitive because we found no interesting rocks.

                        (Young archeologists) Based on this boat we found sunk in deep fresh water they had a complex and refined woodworking culture 100k years earlier than your stone working civilization.

                        (Old archeologists) All these people walked here on a land bridge you know...

                        (Young archeologists) - rolls eyes in a 'racists will soon be dead' way.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                          @tinker

                          I think you might have just solved the Roman Dodecahedron mystery 😂

                          It's a Roman 3D Printer Test!

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

                          moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                          moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                          moira@mastodon.murkworks.net
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #48

                          @simonzerafa @tinker dry spaghetti serving count measurement. gotta be.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper