Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Can hacker culture survive LLMs?

Can hacker culture survive LLMs?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
evanpollpoll
21 Indlæg 10 Posters 10 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

    Can hacker culture survive LLMs?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_culture
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model

    #EvanPoll #poll

    smish@fosstodon.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
    smish@fosstodon.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
    smish@fosstodon.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #5

    @evan
    Hacker culture might thrive in LLMs.

    evan@cosocial.caE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/survive too I guess

      Update: and https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/can

      malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      malte@radikal.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #6

      @evan I wonder what's going on when you start linking every word to a dictionary entry to prevent people from nit-picking at your wording

      evan@cosocial.caE philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.comP 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • smish@fosstodon.orgS smish@fosstodon.org

        @evan
        Hacker culture might thrive in LLMs.

        evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
        evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
        evan@cosocial.ca
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #7

        @smish that's an interesting thought!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • malte@radikal.socialM malte@radikal.social

          @evan I wonder what's going on when you start linking every word to a dictionary entry to prevent people from nit-picking at your wording

          evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
          evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
          evan@cosocial.ca
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #8

          @malte that horse has left the barn

          https://cosocial.ca/@evan/116315773108227041

          malte@radikal.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

            Can hacker culture survive LLMs?

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_culture
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model

            #EvanPoll #poll

            kworker@kolektiva.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kworker@kolektiva.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kworker@kolektiva.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #9

            @evan I think if hackers reject reliance on them, yes. Just plugging things in to an LLM and using the output is like a new variant on script-kiddie. No learning or understanding, just some megacorp-produced algorithm in a hyperscalar data center doing everything for you. Likewise for using LLM-generated code to make software.

            But, people just focused on the "number-go-up" aspect of CTFs or a "move fast break things" time-to-ship minimizing dev workflow? Absolutely hooked on LLMs and also not hacker culture

            evan@cosocial.caE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

              Can hacker culture survive LLMs?

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_culture
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model

              #EvanPoll #poll

              ragectl@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
              ragectl@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
              ragectl@hachyderm.io
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #10

              @evan hacker culture opened the idea of building AI pollution/defense tools when everything on the internet was being slurped into the cooking vats before people started eating the virtual soylent green. So I think it will survive.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • kworker@kolektiva.socialK kworker@kolektiva.social

                @evan I think if hackers reject reliance on them, yes. Just plugging things in to an LLM and using the output is like a new variant on script-kiddie. No learning or understanding, just some megacorp-produced algorithm in a hyperscalar data center doing everything for you. Likewise for using LLM-generated code to make software.

                But, people just focused on the "number-go-up" aspect of CTFs or a "move fast break things" time-to-ship minimizing dev workflow? Absolutely hooked on LLMs and also not hacker culture

                evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                evan@cosocial.ca
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #11

                @kworker so, "yes, but" only if hackers refuse to use them?

                kworker@kolektiva.socialK 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                  @malte that horse has left the barn

                  https://cosocial.ca/@evan/116315773108227041

                  malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  malte@radikal.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #12

                  @evan Sure has. I guess I wonder where the nitpicking impulse comes from. It is as if this medium amplifies it.

                  evan@cosocial.caE 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • malte@radikal.socialM malte@radikal.social

                    @evan Sure has. I guess I wonder where the nitpicking impulse comes from. It is as if this medium amplifies it.

                    evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                    evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                    evan@cosocial.ca
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #13

                    @malte it's the Socratic method. You can win every argument by demanding a rigorous definition of every term under question, and exhausting your opponent until they concede whatever you want to make them say.

                    golemwire@fosstodon.orgG malte@radikal.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                      @kworker so, "yes, but" only if hackers refuse to use them?

                      kworker@kolektiva.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kworker@kolektiva.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kworker@kolektiva.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #14

                      @evan I'm not sure if I'd say complete avoidance, or refusal to rely on them, or refusal to use them for anything serious.

                      Clearly other people using LLMs introduces opportunity to hack such systems, and I wouldn't want to foreclose the possibility of local-only LLM models that can be built and used in ethically and ecologically sustainable ways. But I think offloading your thinking to a giant tech corp is definitely not in line with the hacker spirit or culture I understand.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                        @kworker so, "yes, but" only if hackers refuse to use them?

                        kworker@kolektiva.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kworker@kolektiva.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kworker@kolektiva.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #15

                        @evan I'm not sure if I'd say complete avoidance, or refusal to rely on them, or refusal to use them for anything serious.

                        Clearly other people using LLMs introduces opportunity to hack such systems, and I wouldn't want to foreclose the possibility of local-only LLM models that can be built and used in ethically and ecologically sustainable ways. But I think offloading your thinking to a giant tech corp is definitely not in line with the hacker spirit or culture I understand.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                          Can hacker culture survive LLMs?

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_culture
                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model

                          #EvanPoll #poll

                          kini@maro.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kini@maro.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kini@maro.xyz
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #16

                          @evan Running your own local LLM, Giving it a bunch of custom tools, figuring out jailbreaks so it will do pen-testing without complaining.

                          LLMs are extremely fun when you have a hacker mentality.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                            @kworker so, "yes, but" only if hackers refuse to use them?

                            kworker@kolektiva.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kworker@kolektiva.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kworker@kolektiva.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #17

                            @evan I'm not sure if I'd say complete avoidance, or refusal to rely on them, or refusal to use them for anything serious.

                            Clearly other people using LLMs introduces opportunity to hack such systems, and I wouldn't want to foreclose the possibility of local-only LLM models that can be built and used in ethically and ecologically sustainable ways. But I think offloading your thinking to a giant tech corp is definitely not in line with the hacker spirit or culture I understand.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • malte@radikal.socialM malte@radikal.social

                              @evan I wonder what's going on when you start linking every word to a dictionary entry to prevent people from nit-picking at your wording

                              philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                              philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                              philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.com
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #18

                              @malte @evan Ah but the problem is each word individually isn’t enough, looking up the definitions of mountain and top may not lead you to the same conclusion as the general consensus definition for “mountain top”, meaning we’ll also need to link to every n possible combinations of words in the post.

                              /s

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                                @malte it's the Socratic method. You can win every argument by demanding a rigorous definition of every term under question, and exhausting your opponent until they concede whatever you want to make them say.

                                golemwire@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                                golemwire@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                                golemwire@fosstodon.org
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #19

                                @evan @malte That depends on the definition of "exhausting" >:)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                                  Can hacker culture survive LLMs?

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_culture
                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model

                                  #EvanPoll #poll

                                  johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  johannab@cosocial.ca
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #20

                                  @evan

                                  Yes, but unfortunately at the cost of recreating the sort of factions we've been trying to get out of for many years.

                                  Gonna be a while, and a lot of pain, before we settle on an acceptable and productive moderate middle and start reskilling not just 'hackers' but users/consumers to be more aware of what their software is doing.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                                    @malte it's the Socratic method. You can win every argument by demanding a rigorous definition of every term under question, and exhausting your opponent until they concede whatever you want to make them say.

                                    malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    malte@radikal.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #21

                                    @evan I see ... That's annoying. I don't like repetitive input that takes us further away from the heart of the matter. Off-screen, I find it easier to cut someone off that is derailing a conversation and ask them to get to the point. In this medium, people can go on and on, perhaps because we're not in dialogue. I wonder what an effective strategy is on-screen?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Svar
                                    • Svar som emne
                                    Login for at svare
                                    • Ældste til nyeste
                                    • Nyeste til ældste
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Log ind

                                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Hjem
                                    • Seneste
                                    • Etiketter
                                    • Populære
                                    • Verden
                                    • Bruger
                                    • Grupper