Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
profsamlecturet
32 Indlæg 23 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

    There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

    1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #22

    @sundogplanets 🤬☹️

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

      There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

      1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

      nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
      nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
      nead@social.vivaldi.net
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #23

      @sundogplanets Keep fighting the good fight, Professor. We need someone to give us accurate information we can rely on.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

        There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

        1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

        thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        thejacenallen@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #24

        @sundogplanets sorry for the intrusion but I imagine you update these numbers before your speech. What if you did it during your speech to show just how crazy it is. You could say you last updated it on so and so but lets update the number right now and then possibly people would be shocked at just how many more there are. Anyways disregard if this is silly nonsense.

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT thejacenallen@mastodon.social

          @sundogplanets sorry for the intrusion but I imagine you update these numbers before your speech. What if you did it during your speech to show just how crazy it is. You could say you last updated it on so and so but lets update the number right now and then possibly people would be shocked at just how many more there are. Anyways disregard if this is silly nonsense.

          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #25

          @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

          crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

            crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
            crazypedia@mypocketpals.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
            crazypedia@mypocketpals.online
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #26

            @sundogplanets@mastodon.social @thejacenallen@mastodon.social and dont swear when there's a big launch between updates and presentation 😅

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK kitkat_blue@mastodon.social

              @sundogplanets

              is anyone quantifying/studying the possible effects/persistance/deposition specifics of the injection of vaporized metals etc in the atmosphere from de-orbiting starlink satellites (and others) ?

              Is this ~15% attrition rate on these starlink satellites expected to be a sustained rate over the life of the program? If so... cumulatively, this could become quite significant over time. I do hope it's being looked at.

              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sundogplanets@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #27

              @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

              kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                @thejacenallen HA!! I love this idea! Doing math in front of a lot of people is a recipe for disaster, but I love this

                thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                thejacenallen@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                thejacenallen@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #28

                @sundogplanets oh yeah the math. No way. I would never attempt this myself.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

                  kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #29

                  @sundogplanets

                  Tyvm!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    @kitkat_blue Here's one paper: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

                    kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #30

                    @sundogplanets

                    So, "yearly excess of more than 640% above natural (meteorite contribution) levels" plus "a noticeable delay (~30 years) between the beginning of the injection process when orbiting bodies are decommissioned and the eventual ozone-depletion consequences in the stratosphere." seems to add up to a potential ticking time bomb for the ozone layer. 😰

                    Other than saying "significant" they don't attempt to quantify the impact...i'd be curious as to what that might be.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                      There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                      1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #31

                      Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                      There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                      #ProfSamLectureTour

                      austinross@social.lolA 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        Are you fucking kidding me?? I have to update the Starlink numbers AGAIN from YESTERDAY.

                        There are now 9,551 Starlink satellites in orbit. 25 more than yesterday. FUUUUUUCCCKKKK I am going to bed.

                        #ProfSamLectureTour

                        austinross@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                        austinross@social.lolA This user is from outside of this forum
                        austinross@social.lol
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #32

                        @sundogplanets Will future generations be able to see the stars? Can we decommission these satellites? Or are we turning the sky into another landfill?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper