New blog-post: "When online commenters 'detect' my art as AI"

[jeeynet@framapiaf.org]

@davidrevoy Ce serait possible que ce soit une forme de "contre-attaque" au fait que tu sois ouvertement anti-IA ?

(ou c'est évident pour tout le monde et je ne fais qu'enfoncer des portes ouvertes ?)

[feff@comicscamp.club]

@davidrevoy
I hate the assumption that you used AI and not that the AI was trained on your (and others) work.

I'm so sorry you have to deal with these kinds of comments

[artair@ohbear.wtf]

@davidrevoy Now for the big question: how many of these questions are sincere, and how many come from AI troll-bots? Because Silicon Valley has a vested interest in making sure nobody can distinguish slop from reality.

[mjd@mathstodon.xyz]

@davidrevoy Wow, this is horrible. I'm so sorry.

[adamrice@c.im]

@davidrevoy It’s a photoshop I can tell from the pixels

[datarama@hachyderm.io]

@davidrevoy As I said to you a while ago:

Before I started following you personally here, I'd sometimes see people talking about some of your works and about whether they're AI, but when I saw them I *consistently* thought "the Framasoft guy", not "AI".

[nemojmeno@piaille.fr]

@davidrevoy omfg bravo réussir à transformer ça en blague pour une Bd ça aurait été au dessus de mes forces j'ai juste envie de chercher personnellement chacune de ces personnes et de les secouer

[compu73e@retro.pizza]

@davidrevoy reading this makes me so mad, my hate for generative AI burns with the fire of a thousand suns

[multisn8@donotsta.re]

@davidrevoy@framapiaf.org Hugs and comforts. Being in the hegemonically accepted rate of false positives sucks

[bbbhltz@framapiaf.org]

@davidrevoy holy moly, that's f-ing crazy

[desatyr@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy

OMG

"So much inconsistencies...."

Don' t be sad, we all know You for many years (15 - 20) and appreciate your artwork.

A pity that AI is trained with artists stuff and now people cannot tell anymore what is real art.

[synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net]

@davidrevoy there are lots of troll bots and briganding minors active on web now, and their behavior can be identical. plus lots of dumb or intoxicated folks. will explain much of that "pile on of false accusations" effect. its bitten me too. I like Mastodon in part cuz happens here less

[faoluin@chitter.xyz]

@davidrevoy If these comments are mostly coming from Meta's platforms, it's probably just worth ignoring them altogether. They are obviously having a negative influence on you. And those platforms are full of bots and terrible people anyway. Just post and close the tab.

[thedailyburble@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy
That's awful!

[synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net]

@davidrevoy this is part of why I am both enraged by and nauseated by this AI hype fad. because it ruins society like this

[damonwakes@mastodon.sdf.org]

@datarama @davidrevoy Same. It does have "that look" at a glance, but you can tell that there's actually a point to the details in each panel rather than it just being a "good-enough" response to some prompt.

[number6@fosstodon.org]

@davidrevoy

They're all looking at technical details. Wrong approach. Human artists vary a lot in how
they depict fine details.

The way I can tell that your art isn't AI is how closely the mood of the characters matches the dialog. AI can't seem to really understand that people look at people, and isn't very good at subtle emotions displayed through facial expressions and body language.

Of course, in another year that could change ...

[aldoart@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy All I see is a group of people who want to look smart but end up looking like fools ‍️

[skobkin@gts.skobk.in]

@davidrevoy Speaks a lot about "anti-AI" hysteria.
These people don't need art. They need an enemy to vent their frustration on.

If only we could simply appreciate art based on whether we like it, no matter who created it.

[yoh@hachyderm.io]

@davidrevoy, if not "1 mo" markers I would think that these people are having fun of the last comic.