Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has a new definition of “reasonable expectation.” According to the justices, it’s no longer reasonable to assume that what you type into Google is yours to keep.

"The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has a new definition of “reasonable expectation.” According to the justices, it’s no longer reasonable to assume that what you type into Google is yours to keep.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
usapennsylvaniagoogleprivacysurveillance
1 Indlæg 1 Posters 2 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • remixtures@tldr.nettime.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    remixtures@tldr.nettime.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    remixtures@tldr.nettime.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    "The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has a new definition of “reasonable expectation.” According to the justices, it’s no longer reasonable to assume that what you type into Google is yours to keep.

    In a decision that reads like a love letter to the surveillance economy, the court ruled that police were within their rights to access a convicted rapist’s search history without a warrant. The reasoning is that everyone knows they’re being watched anyway.

    The opinion, issued Tuesday, leaned on the idea that the public has already surrendered its privacy to Silicon Valley.

    We obtained a copy of the ruling for you here.

    “It is common knowledge that websites, internet-based applications, and internet service providers collect, and then sell, user data,” the court said, as if mass exploitation of personal information had become a civic tradition.

    Because that practice is so widely known, the court concluded, users cannot reasonably expect privacy. In other words, if corporations do it first, the government gets a free pass."

    https://reclaimthenet.org/pennsylvania-court-rules-no-privacy-in-google-searches

    #USA #Pennsylvania #Google #Privacy #Surveillance #PoliceState

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
    Svar
    • Svar som emne
    Login for at svare
    • Ældste til nyeste
    • Nyeste til ældste
    • Most Votes


    • Log ind

    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

    • Login or register to search.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    Graciously hosted by data.coop
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Hjem
    • Seneste
    • Etiketter
    • Populære
    • Verden
    • Bruger
    • Grupper