Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. It's pretty simple.

It's pretty simple.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
58 Indlæg 46 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • brunogirin@mastodon.me.ukB brunogirin@mastodon.me.uk

    @evan @cwebber or he got paid a shed load of money?

    evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
    evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
    evan@cosocial.ca
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #47

    @brunogirin @cwebber I mean, almost by definition!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • megmac@social.treehouse.systemsM megmac@social.treehouse.systems

      @evan @cwebber not all marketing is pre-planned. Sometimes useful things happen and you take advantage of them. Someone had to decide this was a story the wsj should run, and they may or may not be invested in this narrative.

      evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
      evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
      evan@cosocial.ca
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #48

      @megmac @cwebber right. Taking advantage of the controversy.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mk30@tilde.zoneM mk30@tilde.zone

        @Lily_and_frog @cwebber @FantasticalEconomics but...if it kills everyone.... Do you see where I'm going with this?

        raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        raphaelmorgan@disabled.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #49

        @mk30 @Lily_and_frog @cwebber @FantasticalEconomics rich people don't understand that they're also mortal. To them, it's the "kill everyone but me" machine, their favorite type!

        mk30@tilde.zoneM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR raphaelmorgan@disabled.social

          @mk30 @Lily_and_frog @cwebber @FantasticalEconomics rich people don't understand that they're also mortal. To them, it's the "kill everyone but me" machine, their favorite type!

          mk30@tilde.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
          mk30@tilde.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
          mk30@tilde.zone
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #50

          @raphaelmorgan @Lily_and_frog @cwebber @FantasticalEconomics so far this is the only answer that makes some sense.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

            It's pretty simple. You're hearing "We're so scared of the AIs, we need to reign them in" from the very US companies building and selling them for two reasons:

            - They're about to IPO, and it's amazing marketing for them
            - They want a regulatory moat, since they're deeply worried about the open weight LLMs. They want everyone dependent on this tech and to be *the only ones legally permitted to dispense it*.

            homlett@mamot.frH This user is from outside of this forum
            homlett@mamot.frH This user is from outside of this forum
            homlett@mamot.fr
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #51

            RE: https://mamot.fr/@homlett/117270256444800551

            @cwebber

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

              It's pretty simple. You're hearing "We're so scared of the AIs, we need to reign them in" from the very US companies building and selling them for two reasons:

              - They're about to IPO, and it's amazing marketing for them
              - They want a regulatory moat, since they're deeply worried about the open weight LLMs. They want everyone dependent on this tech and to be *the only ones legally permitted to dispense it*.

              npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              npars01@mstdn.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #52

              @cwebber

              Regulatory capture -- always a fun game for sociopaths

              https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/09/14/big-ai-sets-out-its-terms-for-regulatory-capture-and-calls-it-pace-the-frontier/5296067

              https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2026/09/14/viral-ai-doom-post-sparks-market-fear-and-regulatory-capture-concerns-for-nasdaq-nvda-nasdaq-googl-nasdaq-amd/

              https://www.theregreview.org/2026/08/31/shapiro-regulatory-capture-and-the-fossil-fuel-companies-attempts-to-preempt-tort-lawsuits/

              Tort law manipulation in disguise.

              The fossil fuel industry & its shills in AI want what the gun lobby got; the impunity to mass murder
              https://themodernregulator.com/how-regulatory-capture-works-and-what-regulators-can-do-about-it/

              The goal is to shield profits & privilege to a select few.
              https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/regulatory-capture/

              https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/bootleggers-baptists-and-ai/

              It also balloons profits for bootleggers, just like Prohibition did for the mafia

              mxchara@cyberpunk.lolM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                It's pretty simple. You're hearing "We're so scared of the AIs, we need to reign them in" from the very US companies building and selling them for two reasons:

                - They're about to IPO, and it's amazing marketing for them
                - They want a regulatory moat, since they're deeply worried about the open weight LLMs. They want everyone dependent on this tech and to be *the only ones legally permitted to dispense it*.

                budududuroiu@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                budududuroiu@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                budududuroiu@hachyderm.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #53

                @cwebber we do have to reign AI in, AI right now is enough of a threat, but the only people talking about safety are the ones that stand to gain financially from regulatory capture. Yet again the progressives self-own by blindly going the opposite direction of whatever capital is saying

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                  @cwebber so, I tend to agree with this pov.

                  But the current AI safety conversation started when an ex-Anthropic researcher said he was scared, which doesn't fit the corporate astroturfing narrative.

                  https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-researcher-quits-over-out-of-control-ai-fears-707b7628

                  nobody@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nobody@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nobody@mastodon.acm.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #54

                  @evan @cwebber part of the HPMoR crowd...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

                    @cwebber so, I tend to agree with this pov.

                    But the current AI safety conversation started when an ex-Anthropic researcher said he was scared, which doesn't fit the corporate astroturfing narrative.

                    https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-researcher-quits-over-out-of-control-ai-fears-707b7628

                    ricci@discuss.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ricci@discuss.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ricci@discuss.systems
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #55

                    @evan @cwebber whatever the "real" story here, they are bad people and should not get what they want

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • aoristdual@floss.socialA aoristdual@floss.social

                      @cwebber I suspect also that they would like to reign in their outrageous R&D costs.

                      They know their customers are not loyal and are sensitive to both price and perceived quality.

                      Establishing an anticompetitive cabal fixes that problem.

                      skry@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      skry@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      skry@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #56

                      @aoristdual @cwebber rein: horses and LLMs
                      reign: kings

                      Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                        @cwebber

                        Regulatory capture -- always a fun game for sociopaths

                        https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/09/14/big-ai-sets-out-its-terms-for-regulatory-capture-and-calls-it-pace-the-frontier/5296067

                        https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2026/09/14/viral-ai-doom-post-sparks-market-fear-and-regulatory-capture-concerns-for-nasdaq-nvda-nasdaq-googl-nasdaq-amd/

                        https://www.theregreview.org/2026/08/31/shapiro-regulatory-capture-and-the-fossil-fuel-companies-attempts-to-preempt-tort-lawsuits/

                        Tort law manipulation in disguise.

                        The fossil fuel industry & its shills in AI want what the gun lobby got; the impunity to mass murder
                        https://themodernregulator.com/how-regulatory-capture-works-and-what-regulators-can-do-about-it/

                        The goal is to shield profits & privilege to a select few.
                        https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/regulatory-capture/

                        https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/bootleggers-baptists-and-ai/

                        It also balloons profits for bootleggers, just like Prohibition did for the mafia

                        mxchara@cyberpunk.lolM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mxchara@cyberpunk.lolM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mxchara@cyberpunk.lol
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #57

                        @Npars01 @cwebber it's really a neat trick, effectively the tech sector's way of saying "we can wreck so much of your shit by screwing with your software, so maybe you should just give us the money and stop complaining"

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                          @bytebro @cwebber Gödel said you can be complete *or* consistent. You get to pick one! And the Gödel sentences that prove you can't have both are *really* complicated, he had to work hard to design one. And English isn't a formal logic

                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #58

                          @mcc > Gödel said you can be complete *or* consistent.

                          ah is this why good backwards compatibility is at odds with a compact interface

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jeppe@uddannelse.socialJ jeppe@uddannelse.social shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper