please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Honestly, I wouldn’t know how to. I’m sure I could if I was bothered but I’m not.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial @dgar But voting on ActivityPub is not anonymous. While there is no interface to see it, it can be extracted through API, from what I recall.
What does chatting mean here? Using LLM or specifically thinking that I have a chat with a sentiment being?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I'd say not at all because I don't use it for assistance, but I put a couple times a month because I do occasionally chat with it to test its limits (biases, boundaries, absurdities)
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Chat in the sense I ask it to look something up for me. Or write a risk assessment for scouts. I don't ask how it's hanging. That would be weird.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial okay, I did try it out twice.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Chat? Like a conversation? Never. I will admit to using an LLM to convert a normal paragraph into a structured format my Director wants event summaries in, does that count?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial 'Chat' voluntarily, I don't. I am sometimes forced to use LLM chatbots as a sort of text-based phone-tree so I can get to the actual person I need to talk to or form I need to fill out.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Privately, almost never. At work, over 1 hour per day. If my employee has nothing against putting their code into suspicious system, that’s not my problem!
-
@Rhodium103
nicely put.@falcennial @Rhodium103 I'm also going to interpret "telling customer service chatbot to fuck off and get me an actual customer service representative" as not counting as "chatting".
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Define "chat with." Does "yell at to do stuff in copilot-cli" count?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial does spamming variations on "let me speak to a human" cause there's no other way to get support for services count? otherwise none
-
@falcennial @Rhodium103 I'm also going to interpret "telling customer service chatbot to fuck off and get me an actual customer service representative" as not counting as "chatting".
@dalias lol. This is so real
-
@falcennial Privately, almost never. At work, over 1 hour per day. If my employee has nothing against putting their code into suspicious system, that’s not my problem!
@falcennial @aemstuz What an opportunity to put backdoors all over the system. “LLM gave me this code”. -
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Wow so many disgusting AI users to block in this thread! Thanks!
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial For office and personal work? A lot, and yes, willingly. I guess I'm one of the lazy ass that wouldn't do things the hard way if I don't have to, and I don't. I wouldn't call that chatting with the thing though. I only care about my bottom line, results. I don't pretend the thing is intelligent or even friendly. As far as I'm concerved it's just a sofisticated information storage and retrieval tool. No point in falling in love or hating it.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I'm sure there's been a few times where I've unknowingly chatted with one. But I refuse to use them.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Chat as a person? Never. Chat as in "get these two files and combine them into one, and adjust formatting" because that's how my work is now? A few times a week. Also the thing is literally part of the operating system. I don't think I can search for an e-mail without using it?
-
@falcennial @aemstuz What an opportunity to put backdoors all over the system. “LLM gave me this code”.
@brie That's an accepted risk. Let's create a ticket in the backlog to fix that later
-
@trechnex @falcennial I haven't had an employer require me to use any LLM-based tools yet and I'm legitimately curious about what that looks like.
Like my employers care less about how a task gets accomplished and more about it being accomplished, so long as I'm using approved tools and not say, buying subscriptions that haven't been vetted.
It's hard to imagine getting a directive that I *have* to use an LLM
