Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Have you ever used a zipper?

Have you ever used a zipper?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
134 Indlæg 73 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

    @ireneista please!! It's the best kind of reply! I love how many kinds of knowledge and teaching threads like this elicit 🙂

    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
    ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #87

    @grimalkina oh, well, good! yeah that particular illustration was super helpful to us as kids, and it's not a topic that is taught nearly as widely to children anymore, so a while back we decided we wanted to have it handy and went and found a scan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

      in re zippers: been studying interwar sewing books, especially 1920s, exactly because they DO NOT deal with zippers. they weren't cheap until after WW2.

      the zippered bomber jackets of WW1 were expensive to make at home. it’s why they became a status symbol among the moneyed classes.

      on the other hand, after WW2 they were cheap army surplus. hence the 1950s poverty coda of the leather jacket, tshirt & jeans ―which, as cheap surplus clothes, didn't have zippers yet.

      so zippers…

      @grimalkina

      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      blogdiva@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #88

      so zippers are really interesting as something people take for granted in clothes but they weren't always there.

      it’s why i wanted to study the logic of crafting pants in a zipperless world.

      well, for starters, pants aren’t trousers because pants are held up by a belt whereas trousers are held up by a fly.

      a zipperless world forces you to fit the pants with just enough ease to keep the pants up without a belt or with an open fly.

      it’s technique over tech. /🧵

      @grimalkina

      ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

        Also just as a PS, it's neither possible nor very adaptive to ask yourself to have an overwhelmingly detailed explanation of mechanisms for everything you encounter, so that's not the goal. Groups of people need to fluently work at many different levels of abstraction.

        The key is matching the level of understanding to the tasks and problems that we have! And often, coordinating different depths of expertise!

        But we can benefit from having metacognitive skills!

        ted@social.gould.cxT This user is from outside of this forum
        ted@social.gould.cxT This user is from outside of this forum
        ted@social.gould.cx
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #89

        @grimalkina there was an article I read on this long ago that I can no longer find that talked about how your grandma's recipes are simple, but you can't make them because of the context she left out. She was an expert and wrote down the details she needed to remember the recipe, but not enough that a novice could make it. Then it compared the differences in what would need to be said for the levels of expertise. Really made it hit home for me. Wish I could find the article again.

        n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

          Also just as a PS, it's neither possible nor very adaptive to ask yourself to have an overwhelmingly detailed explanation of mechanisms for everything you encounter, so that's not the goal. Groups of people need to fluently work at many different levels of abstraction.

          The key is matching the level of understanding to the tasks and problems that we have! And often, coordinating different depths of expertise!

          But we can benefit from having metacognitive skills!

          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #90

          @grimalkina no, right, it's not possible to learn everything along with how to explain it, not all that useful to, shouldn't be the goal, shouldn't be a thing people have to do to solve social problems, and all that

          nonetheless, it's fun and we've spent our whole life trying ><

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

            Also just as a PS, it's neither possible nor very adaptive to ask yourself to have an overwhelmingly detailed explanation of mechanisms for everything you encounter, so that's not the goal. Groups of people need to fluently work at many different levels of abstraction.

            The key is matching the level of understanding to the tasks and problems that we have! And often, coordinating different depths of expertise!

            But we can benefit from having metacognitive skills!

            screwturn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            screwturn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            screwturn@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #91

            @grimalkina
            Delightful thread, thank you!

            I could explain all of the examples you gave, but for many years I was an apprentice and then an instrument technician, so got a ton of insight into how stuff works - BUT dig a little deeper and there are always more layers and interconnected systems that are familiar by mysterious

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sidereal@kolektiva.socialS sidereal@kolektiva.social

              @grimalkina As a result of this thread I went on a binge learning about the history of zipper design.

              I am now using graphite pencils to properly lubricate all of my zippers, thank you very much.

              dgfitch@kolektiva.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dgfitch@kolektiva.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dgfitch@kolektiva.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #92

              @sidereal @grimalkina I learned this from the luthier in my neighborhood: you can put some graphite in the little divots in the nut of a stringed instrument (the part that sticks up as the "zeroth" fret) and that makes tuning less "sticky" (strings much less likely to get stuck and then jump out of tune unexpectedly)

              thanks for making me think about metacognition today!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                In this study, the researchers asked about a range of stimuli, which in my humble opinion* are really fun to quiz yourself on. Can you explain:

                - how a sewing machine works
                - how a can opener works
                - how a flush toilet operates
                - how the heart pumps blood
                - how piano keys make sound

                Some of these are far more elaborate, haha:
                - how the aqualung regulates air-pressure
                - how a transistor works

                *granted...I became a psychologist so maybe my sense of fun is warped

                shapr@recurse.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                shapr@recurse.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                shapr@recurse.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #93

                @grimalkina I think I can say yes to all of these, but I'll check by writing down my answers before finding the genuine answers!

                I very much enjoy explaining these sorts of things to people, but I have met very few who want to hear my explanations!

                Thus I suspect most humans do not know how those things work, not at all.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                  Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

                  Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

                  anke@social.scribblers.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                  anke@social.scribblers.clubA This user is from outside of this forum
                  anke@social.scribblers.club
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #94

                  @grimalkina I think I could, but not because I used them often, bug because I was gifted a book that explained a lot of different technologies using mammoths.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ricci@discuss.systemsR ricci@discuss.systems

                    @jawnsy @grimalkina It's okay, Jonathan, I can't explain where you are either

                    jawnsy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jawnsy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jawnsy@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #95

                    @ricci @grimalkina Questions that I've spent my life searching to answer:

                    Who am I?
                    What am I?
                    Where am I?
                    When am I?
                    Why am I?
                    How am I?

                    I have gone to search for myself. If you should arrive before I do, please wait for me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • oisin@mastodon.ieO oisin@mastodon.ie

                      @grimalkina I love this kind of stuff! I cannot explain how an aqualung regulator works but I know the rest. My special interest is in collecting facts that are entirely irrelevant to my life 😀

                      philsalkie@mindly.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      philsalkie@mindly.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      philsalkie@mindly.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #96

                      @oisin @grimalkina

                      SCUBA regulator is absurdly simple, which is good because complex things fail in complex ways, and complex failures underwater all lead inexorably to the same outcome.

                      There's a rubber diaphragm with one side facing the part that goes in your mouth (mouthpiece). The mouthpiece has some one-way valves so when you exhale, air goes out to the water, but when you inhale, water doesn't come in.

                      That rubber diaphragm will, thus, move inward when you inhale. The diaphragm is attached to a lever on the other side, so when you breathe in, the lever moves. The other end of the lever is hooked to a tiny needle valve, which lets air from the feed hose into the breathing chamber of the mouthpiece. When you stop inhaling, the pressure on the inside and outside of the diaphragm equalizes, it moves back to the "flat" position, and the needle valve closes. Any overpressure just goes out the vents to the water - sometimes that needle valve will stick and you get way more air than you want, but it's not harmful to you (aside from wasting breathable air and shortening the duration of your dive) because it just rushes out the vents.

                      philsalkie@mindly.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • philsalkie@mindly.socialP philsalkie@mindly.social

                        @oisin @grimalkina

                        SCUBA regulator is absurdly simple, which is good because complex things fail in complex ways, and complex failures underwater all lead inexorably to the same outcome.

                        There's a rubber diaphragm with one side facing the part that goes in your mouth (mouthpiece). The mouthpiece has some one-way valves so when you exhale, air goes out to the water, but when you inhale, water doesn't come in.

                        That rubber diaphragm will, thus, move inward when you inhale. The diaphragm is attached to a lever on the other side, so when you breathe in, the lever moves. The other end of the lever is hooked to a tiny needle valve, which lets air from the feed hose into the breathing chamber of the mouthpiece. When you stop inhaling, the pressure on the inside and outside of the diaphragm equalizes, it moves back to the "flat" position, and the needle valve closes. Any overpressure just goes out the vents to the water - sometimes that needle valve will stick and you get way more air than you want, but it's not harmful to you (aside from wasting breathable air and shortening the duration of your dive) because it just rushes out the vents.

                        philsalkie@mindly.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        philsalkie@mindly.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        philsalkie@mindly.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #97

                        @oisin @grimalkina

                        This is referred to as the "secondary" regulator, BTW, because it's fed by a hose with a couple hundred PSI (10 bar) as opposed to the tank, which starts in the 3500 PSI range and drops to a couple hundred.

                        The primary regulator is a similar setup with a flexible metal diaphragm, it knocks the tank pressure down to a level that the secondary mechanism can handle. Usually a primary regulator will have several high pressure ports (for things like pressure gauges) and several low pressure ports (for secondary regulator, backup secondary regulator, buoyancy vest, etc.)

                        Now you've got the whole list!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ted@social.gould.cxT ted@social.gould.cx

                          @grimalkina there was an article I read on this long ago that I can no longer find that talked about how your grandma's recipes are simple, but you can't make them because of the context she left out. She was an expert and wrote down the details she needed to remember the recipe, but not enough that a novice could make it. Then it compared the differences in what would need to be said for the levels of expertise. Really made it hit home for me. Wish I could find the article again.

                          n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                          n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                          n_dimension@infosec.exchange
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #98

                          @ted @grimalkina

                          Take 3 eggs and 1 pound of fujulicated flower.
                          Persertrate until you reach mildly furnacious consistency influkting raisins with vigour!
                          Place in an oven preheated to molfious temperature and bake until shanpy !

                          Enjoy!

                          #recipe

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                            @StompyRobot I would think absolutely!!

                            holliek72@mastodonapp.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
                            holliek72@mastodonapp.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
                            holliek72@mastodonapp.uk
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #99

                            @grimalkina @StompyRobot And also for the zipper experts to understand that the rest of us don't need to know exactly how zippers work in order to use them - they just work well enough that we can use them. This is a comment on computing ...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                              In this study, the researchers asked about a range of stimuli, which in my humble opinion* are really fun to quiz yourself on. Can you explain:

                              - how a sewing machine works
                              - how a can opener works
                              - how a flush toilet operates
                              - how the heart pumps blood
                              - how piano keys make sound

                              Some of these are far more elaborate, haha:
                              - how the aqualung regulates air-pressure
                              - how a transistor works

                              *granted...I became a psychologist so maybe my sense of fun is warped

                              robotistry@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
                              robotistry@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
                              robotistry@fediscience.org
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #100

                              @grimalkina As an engineer, I have both

                              - a surface level grasp of how most of these things work (because I have at one time or another learned it, had to make repairs, or had to figure out whether repairs were possible)

                              AND

                              - copies of "The Way Things Work" and similar books, where mammoths explain them with easy to follow diagrams!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

                                Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

                                wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                wiredfool@fosstodon.org
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #101

                                @grimalkina
                                And if you can, did you have David McCauleys The Way Things Work as a kid?

                                wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                  Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

                                  Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

                                  hawaii@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hawaii@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hawaii@mastodon.world
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #102

                                  @grimalkina Fifty fans standing in two stadium rows, shaking hands as they do “the wave.”

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                    so zippers are really interesting as something people take for granted in clothes but they weren't always there.

                                    it’s why i wanted to study the logic of crafting pants in a zipperless world.

                                    well, for starters, pants aren’t trousers because pants are held up by a belt whereas trousers are held up by a fly.

                                    a zipperless world forces you to fit the pants with just enough ease to keep the pants up without a belt or with an open fly.

                                    it’s technique over tech. /🧵

                                    @grimalkina

                                    ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ericlawton@kolektiva.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #103

                                    @blogdiva

                                    I think I was about 12 when I got my first pair with a zip. Buttons before that.

                                    Mid 1960s England.

                                    @grimalkina

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                      Also just as a PS, it's neither possible nor very adaptive to ask yourself to have an overwhelmingly detailed explanation of mechanisms for everything you encounter, so that's not the goal. Groups of people need to fluently work at many different levels of abstraction.

                                      The key is matching the level of understanding to the tasks and problems that we have! And often, coordinating different depths of expertise!

                                      But we can benefit from having metacognitive skills!

                                      wnd@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wnd@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wnd@fosstodon.org
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #104

                                      @grimalkina I fear this may be a worldview issue*, but as a (lapsed) physicist my natural bent is to apply methods and processes to develop a hierarchies of abstraction and detailed to describe and model the physical world.

                                      For example, with zippers and crossbows, even with limited prior knowledge. Albeit this works better than politics or literature,

                                      * or it could just be XKCD #793

                                      wnd@fosstodon.orgW 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • wnd@fosstodon.orgW wnd@fosstodon.org

                                        @grimalkina I fear this may be a worldview issue*, but as a (lapsed) physicist my natural bent is to apply methods and processes to develop a hierarchies of abstraction and detailed to describe and model the physical world.

                                        For example, with zippers and crossbows, even with limited prior knowledge. Albeit this works better than politics or literature,

                                        * or it could just be XKCD #793

                                        wnd@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wnd@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wnd@fosstodon.org
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #105

                                        @grimalkina (as in "liberal arts majors may be annoying, but there is no nothing more obnoxious than a physicist encountering a new subject...")

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW wiredfool@fosstodon.org

                                          @grimalkina
                                          And if you can, did you have David McCauleys The Way Things Work as a kid?

                                          wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          wiredfool@fosstodon.org
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #106

                                          @grimalkina
                                          Page 15 and 17. Of course, you could be excused for thinking that a mammoth was involved.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper