Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it.

We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
163 Indlæg 47 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    Play Integrity API should be regulated out of existence rather than making another system where companies permit their own products while disallowing others. It shouldn't be legal when Google does it and it shouldn't be legal when Volla and Murena do it either. This is wrong.

    whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
    whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
    whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #92

    @GrapheneOS are you talking with policymakers about this?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • isf@muenchen.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      isf@muenchen.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      isf@muenchen.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #93

      @GrapheneOS
      It's very unfortunate that I'm obviously only reaching an arrogant chat bot here. I had hoped to get in touch with the creators of GrapheneOS.

      hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • neogoth@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        neogoth@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        neogoth@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #94

        @GrapheneOS @MrGR As the open source community we should stand together and make this world a better place with that what we can do and not spread hate on such forums like they do. But some people need to dump their frustrations on people which did some small thing wrong like being angry on the people who tried to steal their project and tried to sue them.
        What counts for me is what you gave the world and that is the only truly safe mobile operating system, not what some dev said in anger.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

          We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it. Companies selling phones should not be deciding which operating systems people are allowed to use for apps.

          https://uattest.net/

          tirohia@genomic.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          tirohia@genomic.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          tirohia@genomic.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #95

          @GrapheneOS
          Is this (unified attestation) an analog of whatever it is that google does in apps that ends up with things like banking apps needing google services? Or am I thinking of something completely different?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P paul_stilgar@mastodon.social

            @GrapheneOS @dristor

            Is it me or grapheneos is only supporters on google pixel models ?
            If yes why should we give money to google ?

            #grapheneos #android

            elevenfingers@pdx.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
            elevenfingers@pdx.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
            elevenfingers@pdx.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #96

            @Paul_stilgar @GrapheneOS @dristor If you want any phone, go buy any phone. You can't put any mobile OS on any smart phone.

            Why does the semiconductor industry rely on ASML? Because they have the best most suitable lithography.

            Mobile security relies on the latest hardware security, firmware security, update support. Many manufacturers have mediocre standards in keeping up. Pixels unfortunately have been the only phones that meet GOS requirements. Motorola is working to on some future devices.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • isf@muenchen.socialI isf@muenchen.social

              @GrapheneOS
              It's very unfortunate that I'm obviously only reaching an arrogant chat bot here. I had hoped to get in touch with the creators of GrapheneOS.

              hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
              hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
              hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchange
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #97

              @isf @GrapheneOS You are talking to the creators of GrapheneOS. They do not put a chatbot behind the official account.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • eskuero@mstdn.ioE eskuero@mstdn.io

                @GrapheneOS sounds like they are just trying to ride the wave of Europe trying to break free of their reliance on american digital companies, which I completely agree, to grab power for themselves, which is still shitty and nothing to celebrate.

                Thankfully my bank's app still works fine with gos and they also allow full web access anyway

                wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                wombatpandaa@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #98

                @eskuero @GrapheneOS would I be wrong to say that this alternative attestation would still preferable to Play Store Integrity? Perhaps there is some background to the people behind it that I am missing.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wombatpandaa@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #99

                  @GrapheneOS @eskuero oh, well of course! Has UAT indicated that they would, or is the concern more an expectation that they would follow in Google's footsteps and reject "unofficial" Android versions?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mrgr@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #100

                    @GrapheneOS aber dann würde es ja ausreichen, wenn ihr diese Falschinformationen über euer eigenes Betriebssystem berichtigt. Statt dessen kritisiert ihr hier pausenlos andere Betriebssysteme. Ich halte eure Öffentlichkeitsarbeit für fatal, so sehr ich GraphenOS schätze und bereits seit Jahren nutze.

                    mrgr@mastodon.socialM grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • mrgr@mastodon.socialM mrgr@mastodon.social

                      @GrapheneOS aber dann würde es ja ausreichen, wenn ihr diese Falschinformationen über euer eigenes Betriebssystem berichtigt. Statt dessen kritisiert ihr hier pausenlos andere Betriebssysteme. Ich halte eure Öffentlichkeitsarbeit für fatal, so sehr ich GraphenOS schätze und bereits seit Jahren nutze.

                      mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mrgr@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #101

                      @GrapheneOS Ich verstehe euren Krieg gegen andere Custom-ROMs nicht. Eure eigentlichen Gegner sind doch die proprietären Betriebssysteme von Apple und Google, nicht andere Betriebssysteme, die von einer ganz kleinen Minderheit genutzt werden.

                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mrgr@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #102

                        @GrapheneOS Ich hätte gerne mal Quellen, wo andere Custom-Rom negativ über GrapheneOS schreiben. Bislang lese ich nur, was ihr über andere Betriebsysteme wie Volla, murena, lineageos Negatives schreibt.

                        bastian@freiburg.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mrgr@mastodon.socialM mrgr@mastodon.social

                          @GrapheneOS Ich hätte gerne mal Quellen, wo andere Custom-Rom negativ über GrapheneOS schreiben. Bislang lese ich nur, was ihr über andere Betriebsysteme wie Volla, murena, lineageos Negatives schreibt.

                          bastian@freiburg.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bastian@freiburg.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bastian@freiburg.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #103

                          @MrGR Daran bin ich auch interessiert. @GrapheneOS

                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                            There's no legitimate purpose for either Play Integrity or Unified Attestation to exist. Both will inherently fail to uphold even basic security standards since otherwise their own products wouldn't be allowed. Root-based attestation is also inherently not a secure approach.

                            privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            privacyfriendly@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #104

                            @GrapheneOS I would like to say Thank You! GrapheneOS devs for giving us the best Privacy and Security on a phone and also a LOT of Peace of Mind for the privacy concious people. 😉👍 Also been using it for a month now and I pretty much like it even if I had to get a Pixel for it, it was worth it!

                            privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                              Play Integrity API should be regulated out of existence rather than making another system where companies permit their own products while disallowing others. It shouldn't be legal when Google does it and it shouldn't be legal when Volla and Murena do it either. This is wrong.

                              civitz@mastodon.unoC This user is from outside of this forum
                              civitz@mastodon.unoC This user is from outside of this forum
                              civitz@mastodon.uno
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #105

                              @GrapheneOS
                              Is there any European citizen initiative to ban this kind of things? Can you help writing one? I would sign it

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                Murena and iodé are extremely hostile towards GrapheneOS. They've spent years misleading people about it with inaccurate claims to promote their insecure products. We'll never work with them. Volla, Murena and iodé should have no say in which OS people can use on their devices.

                                cosmicexcursionist@techhub.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cosmicexcursionist@techhub.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cosmicexcursionist@techhub.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #106

                                @GrapheneOS seeing frequent hostility and drama come out of this account makes me want to switch off of GOS, despite really liking it. It makes me feel uncertain about the sustainability of the project and the character of people behind it. Hopefully the constant drama I am seeing doesn't represent the overall culture of the project. If not, please get someone else to manage the socials!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP privacyfriendly@mastodon.social

                                  @GrapheneOS I would like to say Thank You! GrapheneOS devs for giving us the best Privacy and Security on a phone and also a LOT of Peace of Mind for the privacy concious people. 😉👍 Also been using it for a month now and I pretty much like it even if I had to get a Pixel for it, it was worth it!

                                  privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  privacyfriendly@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #107

                                  @GrapheneOS Also I really hope that Android won't have the same fate as iOS, otherwise our only open-source option remaining is Linux.

                                  grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mrgr@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #108

                                    @neogoth es scheint hier um interne Grabenkämpfe und persönliche Beleidigungen zu handeln. Wie schade! Es gibt doch wichtigeres zu tun, Menschen Alternativen zu #bigtech anbieten und sie zu überzeugen. @GrapheneOS

                                    grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                      We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it. Companies selling phones should not be deciding which operating systems people are allowed to use for apps.

                                      https://uattest.net/

                                      echedellelr@soc.masfloss.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      echedellelr@soc.masfloss.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      echedellelr@soc.masfloss.net
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #109

                                      @GrapheneOS kind reminder that you supported from the beginning Goolag-backed vendor-lockin in pro of security.

                                      This is just the final extension of it.

                                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • zaire@fedi.absturztau.beZ zaire@fedi.absturztau.be

                                        @eskuero @GrapheneOS

                                        torment nexus

                                        european torment nexus

                                        moepmoep@social.tchncs.deM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        moepmoep@social.tchncs.deM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        moepmoep@social.tchncs.de
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #110

                                        @zaire
                                        > we built The European torment nexus, as we don't require the orphan crushing machine to be included in our torment nexus.

                                        @GrapheneOS @eskuero

                                        zaire@fedi.absturztau.beZ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • moepmoep@social.tchncs.deM moepmoep@social.tchncs.de

                                          @zaire
                                          > we built The European torment nexus, as we don't require the orphan crushing machine to be included in our torment nexus.

                                          @GrapheneOS @eskuero

                                          zaire@fedi.absturztau.beZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          zaire@fedi.absturztau.beZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          zaire@fedi.absturztau.be
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #111

                                          @Moepmoep @GrapheneOS @eskuero we only crush non-orphans, yes

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper