Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it.

We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
163 Indlæg 47 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it. Companies selling phones should not be deciding which operating systems people are allowed to use for apps.

    https://uattest.net/

    orca@nya.oneO This user is from outside of this forum
    orca@nya.oneO This user is from outside of this forum
    orca@nya.one
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #88
    @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social
    The reasoning of this project sounds like "We built a FOSS Torment Nexus alternative because the current Torment Nexus is controlled by one company".
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • isf@muenchen.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      isf@muenchen.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      isf@muenchen.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #89

      @GrapheneOS
      Okay, you obviously don't want to answer my question objectively. That's unfortunate, because it makes you seem untrustworthy.
      Or are you just a chatbot anyway?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • neogoth@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        neogoth@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        neogoth@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #90

        @GrapheneOS @MrGR oh damn, sorry i didn't know that, sounds like louis is kinda gaslighting people. Thanks for your clarification, i'll have a look on those kiwifarms posts and investigate more. Hearing that it harmed your project is very sad and i hope for you and your team that it'll get better soon. All that stuff from others also sounds like someone doesn't like that you are enabling phones to be nearly unhackable and as safe and privacy friendly as possible.
        Keep up the great work!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • isf@muenchen.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
          isf@muenchen.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
          isf@muenchen.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #91

          @GrapheneOS
          No, you haven't. You obviously haven't even read my question.
          Once again: yes, they should. But what is to be done if the don't? That was my question.
          As someone who has been using GrapheneOS for many years and supports the project with a monthly donation, I would have expected a factual question to be answered factually. Instead, you repeat political demands that I share, but which do not answer my question. This is unfortunate and makes you appear untrustworthy.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

            Play Integrity API should be regulated out of existence rather than making another system where companies permit their own products while disallowing others. It shouldn't be legal when Google does it and it shouldn't be legal when Volla and Murena do it either. This is wrong.

            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
            whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #92

            @GrapheneOS are you talking with policymakers about this?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • isf@muenchen.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              isf@muenchen.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              isf@muenchen.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #93

              @GrapheneOS
              It's very unfortunate that I'm obviously only reaching an arrogant chat bot here. I had hoped to get in touch with the creators of GrapheneOS.

              hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • neogoth@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                neogoth@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                neogoth@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #94

                @GrapheneOS @MrGR As the open source community we should stand together and make this world a better place with that what we can do and not spread hate on such forums like they do. But some people need to dump their frustrations on people which did some small thing wrong like being angry on the people who tried to steal their project and tried to sue them.
                What counts for me is what you gave the world and that is the only truly safe mobile operating system, not what some dev said in anger.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                  We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it. Companies selling phones should not be deciding which operating systems people are allowed to use for apps.

                  https://uattest.net/

                  tirohia@genomic.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tirohia@genomic.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tirohia@genomic.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #95

                  @GrapheneOS
                  Is this (unified attestation) an analog of whatever it is that google does in apps that ends up with things like banking apps needing google services? Or am I thinking of something completely different?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P paul_stilgar@mastodon.social

                    @GrapheneOS @dristor

                    Is it me or grapheneos is only supporters on google pixel models ?
                    If yes why should we give money to google ?

                    #grapheneos #android

                    elevenfingers@pdx.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    elevenfingers@pdx.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    elevenfingers@pdx.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #96

                    @Paul_stilgar @GrapheneOS @dristor If you want any phone, go buy any phone. You can't put any mobile OS on any smart phone.

                    Why does the semiconductor industry rely on ASML? Because they have the best most suitable lithography.

                    Mobile security relies on the latest hardware security, firmware security, update support. Many manufacturers have mediocre standards in keeping up. Pixels unfortunately have been the only phones that meet GOS requirements. Motorola is working to on some future devices.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • isf@muenchen.socialI isf@muenchen.social

                      @GrapheneOS
                      It's very unfortunate that I'm obviously only reaching an arrogant chat bot here. I had hoped to get in touch with the creators of GrapheneOS.

                      hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hybridstaticanimate@infosec.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #97

                      @isf @GrapheneOS You are talking to the creators of GrapheneOS. They do not put a chatbot behind the official account.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • eskuero@mstdn.ioE eskuero@mstdn.io

                        @GrapheneOS sounds like they are just trying to ride the wave of Europe trying to break free of their reliance on american digital companies, which I completely agree, to grab power for themselves, which is still shitty and nothing to celebrate.

                        Thankfully my bank's app still works fine with gos and they also allow full web access anyway

                        wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wombatpandaa@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #98

                        @eskuero @GrapheneOS would I be wrong to say that this alternative attestation would still preferable to Play Store Integrity? Perhaps there is some background to the people behind it that I am missing.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wombatpandaa@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wombatpandaa@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #99

                          @GrapheneOS @eskuero oh, well of course! Has UAT indicated that they would, or is the concern more an expectation that they would follow in Google's footsteps and reject "unofficial" Android versions?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mrgr@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #100

                            @GrapheneOS aber dann würde es ja ausreichen, wenn ihr diese Falschinformationen über euer eigenes Betriebssystem berichtigt. Statt dessen kritisiert ihr hier pausenlos andere Betriebssysteme. Ich halte eure Öffentlichkeitsarbeit für fatal, so sehr ich GraphenOS schätze und bereits seit Jahren nutze.

                            mrgr@mastodon.socialM grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • mrgr@mastodon.socialM mrgr@mastodon.social

                              @GrapheneOS aber dann würde es ja ausreichen, wenn ihr diese Falschinformationen über euer eigenes Betriebssystem berichtigt. Statt dessen kritisiert ihr hier pausenlos andere Betriebssysteme. Ich halte eure Öffentlichkeitsarbeit für fatal, so sehr ich GraphenOS schätze und bereits seit Jahren nutze.

                              mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mrgr@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #101

                              @GrapheneOS Ich verstehe euren Krieg gegen andere Custom-ROMs nicht. Eure eigentlichen Gegner sind doch die proprietären Betriebssysteme von Apple und Google, nicht andere Betriebssysteme, die von einer ganz kleinen Minderheit genutzt werden.

                              grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrgr@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrgr@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #102

                                @GrapheneOS Ich hätte gerne mal Quellen, wo andere Custom-Rom negativ über GrapheneOS schreiben. Bislang lese ich nur, was ihr über andere Betriebsysteme wie Volla, murena, lineageos Negatives schreibt.

                                bastian@freiburg.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mrgr@mastodon.socialM mrgr@mastodon.social

                                  @GrapheneOS Ich hätte gerne mal Quellen, wo andere Custom-Rom negativ über GrapheneOS schreiben. Bislang lese ich nur, was ihr über andere Betriebsysteme wie Volla, murena, lineageos Negatives schreibt.

                                  bastian@freiburg.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bastian@freiburg.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bastian@freiburg.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #103

                                  @MrGR Daran bin ich auch interessiert. @GrapheneOS

                                  grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                    There's no legitimate purpose for either Play Integrity or Unified Attestation to exist. Both will inherently fail to uphold even basic security standards since otherwise their own products wouldn't be allowed. Root-based attestation is also inherently not a secure approach.

                                    privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    privacyfriendly@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #104

                                    @GrapheneOS I would like to say Thank You! GrapheneOS devs for giving us the best Privacy and Security on a phone and also a LOT of Peace of Mind for the privacy concious people. 😉👍 Also been using it for a month now and I pretty much like it even if I had to get a Pixel for it, it was worth it!

                                    privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                      Play Integrity API should be regulated out of existence rather than making another system where companies permit their own products while disallowing others. It shouldn't be legal when Google does it and it shouldn't be legal when Volla and Murena do it either. This is wrong.

                                      civitz@mastodon.unoC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      civitz@mastodon.unoC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      civitz@mastodon.uno
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #105

                                      @GrapheneOS
                                      Is there any European citizen initiative to ban this kind of things? Can you help writing one? I would sign it

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                                        Murena and iodé are extremely hostile towards GrapheneOS. They've spent years misleading people about it with inaccurate claims to promote their insecure products. We'll never work with them. Volla, Murena and iodé should have no say in which OS people can use on their devices.

                                        cosmicexcursionist@techhub.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cosmicexcursionist@techhub.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cosmicexcursionist@techhub.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #106

                                        @GrapheneOS seeing frequent hostility and drama come out of this account makes me want to switch off of GOS, despite really liking it. It makes me feel uncertain about the sustainability of the project and the character of people behind it. Hopefully the constant drama I am seeing doesn't represent the overall culture of the project. If not, please get someone else to manage the socials!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP privacyfriendly@mastodon.social

                                          @GrapheneOS I would like to say Thank You! GrapheneOS devs for giving us the best Privacy and Security on a phone and also a LOT of Peace of Mind for the privacy concious people. 😉👍 Also been using it for a month now and I pretty much like it even if I had to get a Pixel for it, it was worth it!

                                          privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          privacyfriendly@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          privacyfriendly@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #107

                                          @GrapheneOS Also I really hope that Android won't have the same fate as iOS, otherwise our only open-source option remaining is Linux.

                                          grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper