Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it.

We strongly oppose the Unified Attestation initiative and call for app developers supporting privacy, security and freedom on mobile to avoid it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
163 Indlæg 47 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    @DanielDNK @TycoonTom The standard is not open to everyone. It's run by a group of companies hostile to GrapheneOS which will be permitting their own products but not GrapheneOS.

    Unified Attestation is a centralized system built on top of the Android hardware attestation API for the sole purpose of a power grab where these companies can control which devices and operating systems are allowed. They haven't made their own attestation system. They've made a system to control use of a standard API.

    tycoontom@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
    tycoontom@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
    tycoontom@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #161

    @GrapheneOS @DanielDNK Totally correct "control "👏🏼 see pic👇🏼

    danieldnk@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

      If banks and governments insist on checking devices for security they should define actual standards. It should be possible for any tiny project to be certified at no cost and the standards should be fairly enforced so a mainstream device without current patches is disallowed.

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      josenzhong@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #162

      @GrapheneOS I don't think "security" is ever the real concern here for the government. It's always about control with their limited understanding of cyber security.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tycoontom@infosec.exchangeT tycoontom@infosec.exchange

        @GrapheneOS @DanielDNK Totally correct "control "👏🏼 see pic👇🏼

        danieldnk@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        danieldnk@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        danieldnk@hachyderm.io
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #163

        @TycoonTom @GrapheneOS and if you install it in another profile, alone without Bitwarden in the same profile?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jeppe@uddannelse.socialJ jeppe@uddannelse.social shared this topic
        Svar
        • Svar som emne
        Login for at svare
        • Ældste til nyeste
        • Nyeste til ældste
        • Most Votes


        • Log ind

        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        Graciously hosted by data.coop
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Hjem
        • Seneste
        • Etiketter
        • Populære
        • Verden
        • Bruger
        • Grupper