definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development 😂 they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself.
-
@nixCraft this tweet is not real right?
-
@nixCraft this tweet is not real right?
@dries it's always a good idea to check the sources, but in this case it is real https://x.com/awscloud/status/2064449711155589396 @nixCraft
-
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own@nixCraft Reminds me of this article:
https://www.online.uc.edu/blog/artificial-intelligence-ai-benefits.htmlBenefits of ai.
Each article: "It could."
Not 'it does", or "it can".
It could.Nope.
-
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own@nixCraft the tide is turning
-
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own@nixCraft From the company that brought you: "Move fast and break things" and "Every day is day one"
-
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own@nixCraft feels like a trap, I bet they were like, "any engagement is good engagement" or something like that.
-
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own@nixCraft AI is a 4 yaer old child, it knows *stuff* but you wouldn't want it making you your lunch.
-
@nixCraft From the company that brought you: "Move fast and break things" and "Every day is day one"
@maunzCache @nixCraft Hire and foster the best. i fuckimg hate this company.
-
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own> but writing code isn't the bottleneck ...
... not to mention having the necessary clarity of what to actually write. In my experience the actualy programming better not be the bulk of the work. Yet nothing changes, the programmers writing tons of code where (and are i guess) very often regarded as very productive; Just as the ones writing code nobody understands. For some this seems to still hold for programming machines.
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
-
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own@nixCraft it has always been about consistency and simple architecture with the least amount of dependencies. The fewest lines of logic staying within the guardrails of the architecture to achieve the goal.
Changing the architecture should be a big deal with a lot of thought put into it.
The LLMs have no memory and no consistency. They start new with every request. Every output can introduce a new architecture or add new dependencies in form of frameworks or libraries.
... Unmaintainable
-
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own@nixCraft
Also design.
Review/test/rewrite is made worse by LLM use. -
definitely a refreshing dose of reality check from AWS in the era of AI assisted code development
they are saying this after pushing AI hard at Amazon followed by massive outages at AWS itself. The reality is AI can spit out 5000 lines of code in seconds, but writing code isn't the bottleneck reviewing, debugging, and maintaining it is. You always need humans to double check everything because it is not reliable enough to do anything on its own@nixCraft The normal programmer/coder knew that already before AI was invented and introduced. We made AI, we know AI. Problems started when they want to make money with AI.
-
B bogwitch@social.data.coop shared this topic
