Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
65 Indlæg 47 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • puretaste@mastodon.worldP puretaste@mastodon.world

    @futurebird at work it's literally the older you are, the more likely you are to use it for everything.

    paulwermer@sfba.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
    paulwermer@sfba.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
    paulwermer@sfba.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #45

    @puretaste
    I am stunned by the people using AI, and how they fail to validate what they get. Yes, a lot of over 60s, but several late 30s or 40s. Grew up with computers, but not necessarily especially tech savvy)

    (While I qualify as an old guy, I seen a enough less than accurate or relevant responses in simple on line search responses to feel I was listening to the sleazier salesmen pushing their product over a competitors version.

    (I use 'salesmen' intentionally, as there were very few women in the areas I worked in, and those few were very reliable)

    @futurebird

    puretaste@mastodon.worldP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

      Nothing could be further from the truth. Young people don't like the slop, the most tech people have the harshest words.

      The typical AI fan doesn't know how it works or the limitations: this blind spot makes them both dazzled and fearful ... therefore unable to assign blame to humans when they do crime in a computer suit.

      prozacchiwawa@functional.cafeP This user is from outside of this forum
      prozacchiwawa@functional.cafeP This user is from outside of this forum
      prozacchiwawa@functional.cafe
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #46

      @futurebird

      i feel like the pan flashed very quickly and older people are the main ones still talking about how impressive it all is.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

        Nothing could be further from the truth. Young people don't like the slop, the most tech people have the harshest words.

        The typical AI fan doesn't know how it works or the limitations: this blind spot makes them both dazzled and fearful ... therefore unable to assign blame to humans when they do crime in a computer suit.

        zoidbergforpresident@kolektiva.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
        zoidbergforpresident@kolektiva.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
        zoidbergforpresident@kolektiva.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #47

        @futurebird Being convinced to "create with ai" shows a total lack of understanding both the technology and the arts.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U This user is from outside of this forum
          U This user is from outside of this forum
          unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #48

          @Robinzz3@aus.social

          I’m a fan because I don’t believe AI wants anything from us.

          AI doesn’t want anything from us. The companies that create and sell us AI, now that’s an entirely different story.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • paulwermer@sfba.socialP paulwermer@sfba.social

            @puretaste
            I am stunned by the people using AI, and how they fail to validate what they get. Yes, a lot of over 60s, but several late 30s or 40s. Grew up with computers, but not necessarily especially tech savvy)

            (While I qualify as an old guy, I seen a enough less than accurate or relevant responses in simple on line search responses to feel I was listening to the sleazier salesmen pushing their product over a competitors version.

            (I use 'salesmen' intentionally, as there were very few women in the areas I worked in, and those few were very reliable)

            @futurebird

            puretaste@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
            puretaste@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
            puretaste@mastodon.world
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #49

            @PaulWermer @futurebird yeah, and they continue doing it even though I've lost count of the amount of times I've said "and what does the source say", only for them to discover it doesn't say what the chatbot said.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

              There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

              Nothing could be further from the truth. Young people don't like the slop, the most tech people have the harshest words.

              The typical AI fan doesn't know how it works or the limitations: this blind spot makes them both dazzled and fearful ... therefore unable to assign blame to humans when they do crime in a computer suit.

              worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              worik@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #50

              @futurebird Yea, nah!

              I know it very well, I have been an early adopter.

              Two things true: 1. The most disruptive technology since the Internet, perhaps the steam engine. 2. The promoters and heads of AI companies, are crooks, greed heads and grifters

              I am astounded at the rate of progress and dismayed by the culture of slop

              The "doomers" and the "boosters" (I claim I am neither) are indistinguishable

              A very strange time to be involved in computing

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                worik@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #51

                @bob @Peace @futurebird light bulbs are so much better now

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • aeischeid@mastodon.socialA aeischeid@mastodon.social

                  @futurebird I can attest to the fact there are many software developers who understand how it works well enough and are in fact big fans of LLMs, at least for software development purposes. FWIW though I don't know of any of those who are fans of it outside of that realm

                  worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                  worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                  worik@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #52

                  @aeischeid @futurebird That is not true. I have seen at least two use cases outside software development

                  1. Summerising long documents

                  2. Reviewing documents (a spell checker on steroids)

                  In software I find it more useful to have it review my code than have me review it's code

                  Point is, it is too new to understand properly where it's weaknesses and strengths lie

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

                    @futurebird I‘m as hip and with it as the likes of Cory Doctorow and Ed Zitron are … 😏

                    worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    worik@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #53

                    @stephan324ppm @futurebird Cory Doctorow is a user

                    stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • richpuchalsky@mastodon.socialR richpuchalsky@mastodon.social

                      @futurebird

                      It's not really true that "the most tech" people have the harshest words for it. Most tech people, including the tech influencers, have no real idea how technology works and are variously enthused by AI.

                      raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      raphaelmorgan@disabled.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #54

                      @richpuchalsky @futurebird are you sure she meant "most of the tech people" and not "the most techy of the tech people"?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        raphaelmorgan@disabled.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #55

                        @Robinzz3 @futurebird "It has no private agenda, no hunger for status, money, sex, power or approval." that's all pretty true! However, it is built by corporations and funded by investors, all of whom have agendas and they're all bad
                        The only exceptions I can think of to "LLMs are completely controlled by technofascist oligarchs" are DeepSeek and that one Meta accidentally leaked and then made open source (which was still built by a corporation, one notorious for blatant human rights violations)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                          There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

                          Nothing could be further from the truth. Young people don't like the slop, the most tech people have the harshest words.

                          The typical AI fan doesn't know how it works or the limitations: this blind spot makes them both dazzled and fearful ... therefore unable to assign blame to humans when they do crime in a computer suit.

                          totallynotalurker@app.wafrn.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                          totallynotalurker@app.wafrn.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                          totallynotalurker@app.wafrn.net
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #56

                          @futurebird@sauropods.win

                          Basically this picture.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • desatyr@mastodon.socialD desatyr@mastodon.social

                            @veronica @Phosphenes @rgulick @futurebird

                            My Gen Z kids told me, that Gen X/Boomer and older are more likely to do not recognize AI generated slop.

                            I am doing art and photography, so I get a strange feeling, when I see AI generated Images.

                            A same aged friend of mine is totally in AI and loves his "creations" 😵‍💫

                            Worst are AI Voiceovers. They raise that uncanny feeling in me. brrrrrr 😬

                            atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                            atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                            atleagle@mastodon.online
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #57

                            @desatyr @veronica @Phosphenes @rgulick @futurebird my 15 year old calls out AI images and videos instantly, even in thibgs that are really well done. I will ask her what she sees, and it will take her some time to point out the things that gave her the feel. When I look at her points, she is invariably correct.

                            desatyr@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              worik@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #58

                              @bob @Peace @futurebird Ok! I get your point!! "Smart bulbs", yuck. Even when they were WiFi enabled light bulbs, but, golly, do we get AI enabled bulbs now? Surely not! Say it is not true.

                              worik@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • worik@mastodon.socialW worik@mastodon.social

                                @bob @Peace @futurebird Ok! I get your point!! "Smart bulbs", yuck. Even when they were WiFi enabled light bulbs, but, golly, do we get AI enabled bulbs now? Surely not! Say it is not true.

                                worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                worik@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #59

                                @bob @Peace @futurebird

                                I have a IoT system in my house. It has no AI in it, but I built it with AI. It was my first experiment in "Vibe Coding". I was using Home Assistant - but it illustrates everything wrong (IMO) with a lot of modern Free Software. It is bloated, slow and uses resources like no body pays. My Raspberry Pi 4 was crashing because it overheated running Home Assistant OS.

                                Methinks AI features have landed, or are due to land, in HA. Mēh! Good lucjk to them!

                                worik@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • worik@mastodon.socialW worik@mastodon.social

                                  @bob @Peace @futurebird

                                  I have a IoT system in my house. It has no AI in it, but I built it with AI. It was my first experiment in "Vibe Coding". I was using Home Assistant - but it illustrates everything wrong (IMO) with a lot of modern Free Software. It is bloated, slow and uses resources like no body pays. My Raspberry Pi 4 was crashing because it overheated running Home Assistant OS.

                                  Methinks AI features have landed, or are due to land, in HA. Mēh! Good lucjk to them!

                                  worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  worik@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  worik@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #60

                                  @bob @Peace @futurebird

                                  BTW my vibe-coded IoT experiment: https://codeberg.org/worik/castle-iot

                                  Only Tapu switches for now, all I need.

                                  But a lovely touch screen interface - no X-windows straight SDL on the console.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                    There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

                                    Nothing could be further from the truth. Young people don't like the slop, the most tech people have the harshest words.

                                    The typical AI fan doesn't know how it works or the limitations: this blind spot makes them both dazzled and fearful ... therefore unable to assign blame to humans when they do crime in a computer suit.

                                    zeborah@mastodon.nzZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zeborah@mastodon.nzZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zeborah@mastodon.nz
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #61

                                    @futurebird

                                    "Lower Artificial Intelligence Literacy Predicts Greater AI Receptivity" https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00222429251314491

                                    (Full article is sadly paywalled but the abstract summarises. The final two sentences may make you want to scream into the abyss for a while.)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                      There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

                                      Nothing could be further from the truth. Young people don't like the slop, the most tech people have the harshest words.

                                      The typical AI fan doesn't know how it works or the limitations: this blind spot makes them both dazzled and fearful ... therefore unable to assign blame to humans when they do crime in a computer suit.

                                      akki@toot.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      akki@toot.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      akki@toot.lgbt
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #62

                                      @futurebird ... I am totally writing this out as a quotation to put on my wall. In my crappy calligraphy. Because this sums it all up beautifully. Thank you.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • atleagle@mastodon.onlineA atleagle@mastodon.online

                                        @desatyr @veronica @Phosphenes @rgulick @futurebird my 15 year old calls out AI images and videos instantly, even in thibgs that are really well done. I will ask her what she sees, and it will take her some time to point out the things that gave her the feel. When I look at her points, she is invariably correct.

                                        desatyr@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        desatyr@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        desatyr@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #63

                                        @ATLeagle @veronica @Phosphenes @rgulick @futurebird

                                        In difficult cases I use my kids senses too. 😄

                                        Sometime they can not tell why, but most times they can point wmout what is wrong.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                          There is an attempt to make people feel like being critical of using LLMs is not "hip and with it" Only old people who don't understand technology are unimpressed.

                                          Nothing could be further from the truth. Young people don't like the slop, the most tech people have the harshest words.

                                          The typical AI fan doesn't know how it works or the limitations: this blind spot makes them both dazzled and fearful ... therefore unable to assign blame to humans when they do crime in a computer suit.

                                          samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          samanthajanesmith@lgbtqia.space
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #64

                                          @futurebird I am old, baby boomer gen and everytime I read these threads I get the feeling that us old withered specimens get the blame for AI because we don't always spot it. I can barely spot my wife without my sodding glasses.

                                          Many may not understand it but its not our fucking fault that it's taken over. It's middle aged tech bros mostly and the younger people who actually work on LLMs.

                                          End of rant... Apologies, I am going back to eating my liquidised food while sitting in the rocking chair and shouting at the neighbours kids. Feel free to ignore me.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper