1. Debian Developer resigns from the project in response to the recent vote to allow generative AI use within Debian.2.
-
@KittenKoder hey, if you're coming after me as an AI bro then you've misunderstood the situation, and if you're not, then you might want to be more precise in your language in the future
@jik I've spotted that same person trying to pick ridiculous fights in threads on 3 completely different topics in the space of a week. I suspect they're not being entirely genuine here
-
@jik @grahamperrin @cyberquixote
Surely that was sarcasm? I hope it was...Edit: I recall that, based on other posts the person apparently is a slopper, might be underage based on the content.
@richlv not exactly sarcasm.
A hint. Where I used these two hashtags –
– I'm not truly a member of any police force.
I was not truly upset by the grammar or punctuation.
I was obliquely challenging the person who, it seems, gained popularity by describing the entire Debian community as "fascist fucktards".
-
@jik they are a reddit mod after all... @grahamperrin
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/117184183821339922
@petko true. Genuinely, thanks for taking a few seconds to think beyond the obvious.
If you have not already guessed: my style of moderation (in Reddit) very strongly discourages people from using language such as "fascist fucktards" to describe an entire community.
So, I might keep an eye on these two lists:
https://infosec.exchange/@cyberquixote/117181069908946276/favourites
https://infosec.exchange/@cyberquixote/117181069908946276/reblogs
Cc @davidgerard
-
@msbellows @jik Someone said "Everyone for AI is too for it, and everyone against AI is too against it" and that nails it. Ideologues are noisy at both ends of the spectrum.
This is not really a disagreement over ideology, it is a disagreement over ontology. A disagreement over the nature of reality. Either you believe that the output of an LLM should be treated as if it came from a mind (wrong and delusional) or you do not (correct and reality-based).
-
@marcusxms If you feel compelled to respond with a point by point commentary like this then I really think you missed my point.
-
@msbellows @jik Someone said "Everyone for AI is too for it, and everyone against AI is too against it" and that nails it. Ideologues are noisy at both ends of the spectrum.
@mogul @msbellows @jik "If only those pesky folks with ethics and educated positions would just shut up." Fuck off, Bret.
-
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/117184183821339922
@petko true. Genuinely, thanks for taking a few seconds to think beyond the obvious.
If you have not already guessed: my style of moderation (in Reddit) very strongly discourages people from using language such as "fascist fucktards" to describe an entire community.
So, I might keep an eye on these two lists:
https://infosec.exchange/@cyberquixote/117181069908946276/favourites
https://infosec.exchange/@cyberquixote/117181069908946276/reblogs
Cc @davidgerard
@grahamperrin @petko ^-- this fucker server-hops to continue harassment past a block
-
@AlexsandraSmart @msbellows @jik I'm not doubting that. But I'm also seeing people opposed to AI apply use and/or tolerance of AI as purity tests for projects, people, and purpose, and rejecting any association with anyone who fails their test because of the people off the deep end you're talking about.
@mogul @AlexsandraSmart @msbellows @jik this is easier to understand substituting AI for blood diamonds or something similar. This is not only about application (far more complex by itself than the purity thing, including security issues, future maintenance, brain damage...), but about data center impact, community damage, environmental damage (from carbon footprint to rare elements to local community harm), technooligarchy support, (main) use in military and surveillance, and contribution to likely the next big economical crash.
-
@mogul @AlexsandraSmart @msbellows @jik this is easier to understand substituting AI for blood diamonds or something similar. This is not only about application (far more complex by itself than the purity thing, including security issues, future maintenance, brain damage...), but about data center impact, community damage, environmental damage (from carbon footprint to rare elements to local community harm), technooligarchy support, (main) use in military and surveillance, and contribution to likely the next big economical crash.
@mogul @AlexsandraSmart @msbellows @jik wow, the analogy with blood diamonds so much understates the problem.
-
@jik Odd that everyone has jumped on the AI aspect of this when what I could see was a problem with civil discussions and debate in open source communities without resorting to personal insults and unprofessional behaviour (and even then, someone initially could be upset/frustrated, write something and then apologise later potentially if it’s not part of a pattern of behaviour).
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
