Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. HEY.

HEY.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
59 Indlæg 37 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

    @dalius_berger @PsyChuan there was a controversy in the Republic of Ireland because water was unmetered and free so OBVIOUSLY people were squandering it.

    A coalition including the Green Party began to roll out metering and set up a utility to charge people. It got massive popular resistance and was ultimately defeated, but the meters did go in.

    When the dust settled it turned out Irish people used less water on average than the metered, privatised. UK.

    Metering did help find leaks though.

    nacly@floss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nacly@floss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nacly@floss.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #34

    @davey_cakes @dalius_berger @PsyChuan Amazing story, thank you for sharing!

    Can you share some further readings so that I can read more about this?

    davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

      @PsyChuan caverate, its only bullshit if you live outside capitalism. From inside the current mess it is still badly relevant.

      We need social composting

      ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
      ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
      ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #35

      @witchescauldron @PsyChuan You CAN have some forms of capitalism whilst still regulating the commons for everyone's benefit, I believe. But it does need restraint and legal restriction to do so. Personally, I would probably prefer Capitalism as we have it now to be dismantled, but there doesn't appear to be enough people to agree with me, so we might have to work on the legal and practical regulation.

      whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

        HEY.

        whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

        - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

        - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

        - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

        bearsong@ravenation.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
        bearsong@ravenation.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
        bearsong@ravenation.club
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #36

        @PsyChuan

        thank you for this clear & concise summary

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • matildalove@wetdry.worldM matildalove@wetdry.world

          @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan "if you let everyone share freely, some jerk will obviously ruin it" —jerk who wants nothing more than to ruin it

          nske@ravenation.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
          nske@ravenation.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
          nske@ravenation.club
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #37

          @matildalove @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan that's exactly it - it's a threat, not an explanation of any kind.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • matildalove@wetdry.worldM matildalove@wetdry.world

            @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan "if you let everyone share freely, some jerk will obviously ruin it" —jerk who wants nothing more than to ruin it

            gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gooba42@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #38

            @matildalove @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan This is exactly my takeaway from the lesson.

            Don't let assholes ruin the commons. Whether that's by stealing from it, enclosing pieces of it or just general asshattery.

            Douchebags are inevitable, knock them down as needed.

            psychuan@plush.cityP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nacly@floss.socialN nacly@floss.social

              @davey_cakes @dalius_berger @PsyChuan Amazing story, thank you for sharing!

              Can you share some further readings so that I can read more about this?

              davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
              davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
              davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #39

              @nacly @dalius_berger @PsyChuan

              I don't know where to get a good long read that provides an overview, it was a big part of Irish news for a while.

              Here's an article about the over-estimate and other details, like how leaks were the biggest issue by a mile:

              "It had been estimated homes could be using up to 190 litres per person per day,"

              "But it has emerged that 93% of households are only using about 250 litres per day, or just over 80 litres per person."

              https://www.newstalk.com/news/average-irish-person-uses-half-the-water-previously-estimated-says-irish-water-603653

              nacly@floss.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

                @nacly @dalius_berger @PsyChuan

                I don't know where to get a good long read that provides an overview, it was a big part of Irish news for a while.

                Here's an article about the over-estimate and other details, like how leaks were the biggest issue by a mile:

                "It had been estimated homes could be using up to 190 litres per person per day,"

                "But it has emerged that 93% of households are only using about 250 litres per day, or just over 80 litres per person."

                https://www.newstalk.com/news/average-irish-person-uses-half-the-water-previously-estimated-says-irish-water-603653

                nacly@floss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nacly@floss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nacly@floss.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #40

                @davey_cakes @dalius_berger @PsyChuan Thank you!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gooba42@mastodon.socialG gooba42@mastodon.social

                  @matildalove @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan This is exactly my takeaway from the lesson.

                  Don't let assholes ruin the commons. Whether that's by stealing from it, enclosing pieces of it or just general asshattery.

                  Douchebags are inevitable, knock them down as needed.

                  psychuan@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
                  psychuan@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
                  psychuan@plush.city
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #41

                  @gooba42 yooooo Doctor Steel!

                  gooba42@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                    HEY.

                    whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                    - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                    - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                    - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                    ruchirasdatta@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ruchirasdatta@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ruchirasdatta@mathstodon.xyz
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #42

                    @PsyChuan The "tragedy of the commons" depends on a flawed definition of rationality. (I've tried to trace that notion back—someone told me Hume?) Under "superrationality" (something which parents teach their 6-year-old children, so not *that* super), there would be no tragedy of the commons. And indeed that's why commons worked and continue to work in many times and places, as you point out.

                    The very idea that they can't work undermines their working.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                      @gooba42 yooooo Doctor Steel!

                      gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gooba42@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #43

                      @PsyChuan I've heard questionable things about the man, but the idea is way more important and timeless.

                      psychuan@plush.cityP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gooba42@mastodon.socialG gooba42@mastodon.social

                        @PsyChuan I've heard questionable things about the man, but the idea is way more important and timeless.

                        psychuan@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
                        psychuan@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
                        psychuan@plush.city
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #44

                        @gooba42 wait what questionable things?

                        gooba42@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                          @gooba42 wait what questionable things?

                          gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          gooba42@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #45

                          @PsyChuan Sounds like he was a nightmare of a philanderer.

                          The utopian playland needs to be remembered.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU ukeleleeric@mstdn.social

                            @witchescauldron @PsyChuan You CAN have some forms of capitalism whilst still regulating the commons for everyone's benefit, I believe. But it does need restraint and legal restriction to do so. Personally, I would probably prefer Capitalism as we have it now to be dismantled, but there doesn't appear to be enough people to agree with me, so we might have to work on the legal and practical regulation.

                            whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                            whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                            whathappened@c.im
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #46

                            @UkeleleEric

                            No. Capitalism is evil to the core, there is no baby in the bathwater. Imagine saying back in the day: "Personally, I would probably prefer chattel slavery as we have it now to be dismantled, but there doesn't appear to be enough people to agree with me, so we might have to work on the legal and practical regulation."

                            It's the same with capitalism. Don't even consider compromising with it!

                            Besides, state is also evil to the core. You can't use it against capitalism, and the rule of law is bullshit.

                            @witchescauldron @PsyChuan

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM marjolica@social.linux.pizza

                              @PsyChuan Common ownership can work, just like you can get an agreed optimal Prisoners Dilemma. However, even without enclosure by some external actor (such as occurred in the Scottish highlands), it can end in a tragegic outcome. A clear example is in our repeated failures in different fisheries to agree to manage fish stocks sustainably.

                              whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                              whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                              whathappened@c.im
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #47

                              @marjolica

                              How can that be a "clear example" in a world ruled by capital? 🤔

                              @PsyChuan

                              adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • edwiebe@scribili.masto.hostE edwiebe@scribili.masto.host

                                @PsyChuan The atmosphere is a commons. We all use it to breathe and generally rely on it not to change too much.

                                Many people dump CO2 into the atmosphere, changing its properties and behaviour, leading to harm.

                                Everyone experiences the harm, including those who don't change the atmosphere.

                                Some people dump much, much more than others but face no additional costs.

                                If this isn't a tragedy of a commons I don't know what it is.

                                whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                                whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                                whathappened@c.im
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #48

                                @edwiebe

                                It's capitalism, colonialism, state, hierarchy.

                                @PsyChuan

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • whathappened@c.imW whathappened@c.im

                                  @marjolica

                                  How can that be a "clear example" in a world ruled by capital? 🤔

                                  @PsyChuan

                                  adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  adrianriskin@kolektiva.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #49

                                  @whathappened @marjolica @PsyChuan

                                  Also see the Maine lobster fishery for an example of how local control prevents so-called tragedies of the commons. As How did we get here says fisheries are abused because capitalists impose hierarchical controls for their own nefarious purposes.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                                    HEY.

                                    whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                                    - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                                    - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                                    - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                                    fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fiend_unpleasant@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #50

                                    @PsyChuan The Nobel Prize in Economics is fake. https://www.chibus.com/perspectives/2024/2/13/the-nobel-prize-in-economics-is-fake

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • aurochs@todon.euA aurochs@todon.eu

                                      @PsyChuan The tragedy of the commons is absolutely real and a real problem. There are milions of exsmples.
                                      It is the capitalist solution to it that is bulshit.

                                      whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      whathappened@c.im
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #51

                                      @aurochs

                                      You're right about "the capitalist solution", but I think you misunderstand what the "tragedy of the commons" actually was. As put forward by Hardin, it was the claim that commons *inevitably* failed. Not just that shit happens.

                                      That's bullshit, and I back that up with this:
                                      https://c.im/@whathappened/113431315039344882

                                      and this:
                                      https://www.thelandmagazine.org.uk/articles/short-history-enclosure-britain

                                      and this:
                                      https://c.im/@whathappened/113431238520344807

                                      and this:
                                      https://c.im/@whathappened/113432448395719328

                                      @PsyChuan

                                      aurochs@todon.euA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • whathappened@c.imW whathappened@c.im

                                        @aurochs

                                        You're right about "the capitalist solution", but I think you misunderstand what the "tragedy of the commons" actually was. As put forward by Hardin, it was the claim that commons *inevitably* failed. Not just that shit happens.

                                        That's bullshit, and I back that up with this:
                                        https://c.im/@whathappened/113431315039344882

                                        and this:
                                        https://www.thelandmagazine.org.uk/articles/short-history-enclosure-britain

                                        and this:
                                        https://c.im/@whathappened/113431238520344807

                                        and this:
                                        https://c.im/@whathappened/113432448395719328

                                        @PsyChuan

                                        aurochs@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aurochs@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aurochs@todon.eu
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #52

                                        @whathappened @PsyChuan I know what the tragedy of the commons is, and it is definitely real, there are many examples! For example, the farmers that have unrestricted access to a shared aquifer by making their one wells has destroyed and is destroying their water resources in a ratrace where nobody has incentives to be the one that uses less water. The solution for that is governmental regulation and control. Another example is the climate, global warming. Rising temperatures is fucking the whole world, but individual countries don't have real incentives to be the only ones sacrificing some growth while the rest don't care.
                                        There are plenty of examples, and the solutions are varied.
                                        The fact that we hate the proposed solution and the man who proposed them does not negate the problem.

                                        whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • aurochs@todon.euA aurochs@todon.eu

                                          @whathappened @PsyChuan I know what the tragedy of the commons is, and it is definitely real, there are many examples! For example, the farmers that have unrestricted access to a shared aquifer by making their one wells has destroyed and is destroying their water resources in a ratrace where nobody has incentives to be the one that uses less water. The solution for that is governmental regulation and control. Another example is the climate, global warming. Rising temperatures is fucking the whole world, but individual countries don't have real incentives to be the only ones sacrificing some growth while the rest don't care.
                                          There are plenty of examples, and the solutions are varied.
                                          The fact that we hate the proposed solution and the man who proposed them does not negate the problem.

                                          whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          whathappened@c.imW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          whathappened@c.im
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #53

                                          @aurochs

                                          "I know what the tragedy of the commons is..."

                                          No, you clearly don't.

                                          "The solution for that is governmental regulation and control."

                                          No, that's a fantasy. You'll never see that come to pass. State is a big part of the problem and that cannot be changed.

                                          You should explore this thread:
                                          https://c.im/@whathappened/113427830249968598

                                          @PsyChuan

                                          aurochs@todon.euA 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper