Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Can we create and use social networking algorithms on the Fediverse that serve our own personal goals, such as more and deeper personal relationships, career advancement, and more participative citizenship?

Can we create and use social networking algorithms on the Fediverse that serve our own personal goals, such as more and deeper personal relationships, career advancement, and more participative citizenship?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
evanpollpoll
26 Indlæg 15 Posters 45 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

    @evan My answer is a "No" without a but. Any form of classification or algorithmic unpacking reflects intent. Intent with bias. That cannot be seen or changed. No matter how much we try. That's at least my lesson based on many years of experience. And yes, I am fully aware that my personal timeline also reflects a lot of bias based on the people I follow. But that is ultimately a good thing in a world of disinformation and clickbait.

    lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.netL This user is from outside of this forum
    lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.netL This user is from outside of this forum
    lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #21

    @jwildeboer

    And what's wrong with having transparent bias and users' choices about which one to use ?

    @evan

    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.netL lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.net

      @jwildeboer

      And what's wrong with having transparent bias and users' choices about which one to use ?

      @evan

      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #22

      @lienrag That's the point. What is transparency? My simple decision based on (group of) accounts or "something" outside of my control making that decision for me? @evan

      lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.netL 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

        @lienrag That's the point. What is transparency? My simple decision based on (group of) accounts or "something" outside of my control making that decision for me? @evan

        lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.netL This user is from outside of this forum
        lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.netL This user is from outside of this forum
        lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.net
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #23

        @jwildeboer

        A full documentation of how the algorithm operates, and open discussion about the biases it entails.

        @evan

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

          Can we create and use social networking algorithms on the Fediverse that serve our own personal goals, such as more and deeper personal relationships, career advancement, and more participative citizenship?

          #EvanPoll #poll

          kunev@blewsky.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kunev@blewsky.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kunev@blewsky.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #24

          @evan@cosocial.ca yes, but we must keep being vigilant that it's still dangerous in terms of what we can uninentionally inflict on ourselves. An echo chamber or rage maximizing algorithm is worse when controlled by an external entity with specific financial goals and complete disregard for human wellbeing. It is however still bad (even if a bit less) when self imposed by a person. We still think of social interactions the way we did pre-internet and we certainly have the emotional reactions to social interactions that we elvoled to have for (tens of?) thousands of years before the internet.

          I'm assuming what someone already mentioned here, that said algorithms will be somehow entirely user controlled. Anything else is bound to end up as what we have in corporate social media.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

            Can we create and use social networking algorithms on the Fediverse that serve our own personal goals, such as more and deeper personal relationships, career advancement, and more participative citizenship?

            #EvanPoll #poll

            virtuous_sloth@cosocial.caV This user is from outside of this forum
            virtuous_sloth@cosocial.caV This user is from outside of this forum
            virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #25

            @evan I said Yes instead of "Yes, but..." because the but is essentially "you should probably understand what the algorithm does and you need to be responsible for any effects of using it, including on others"...

            But to me that's like "Should you be alive?" with an answer of "Yes, but you should obey the golden rule" which is really "Yes".

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

              Can we create and use social networking algorithms on the Fediverse that serve our own personal goals, such as more and deeper personal relationships, career advancement, and more participative citizenship?

              #EvanPoll #poll

              crse@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
              crse@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
              crse@social.linux.pizza
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #26

              @evan I want algorithm like old school art platform features+its algorithm (DeviantArt, Pixiv, etc).

              Sort by newest or popularity are never a viable solution for art community.

              I remember seeing my DeviantArt feed, and discovering sketch, photography, cosplay, calligraphy, origami, in one place. Some recommendations are literally 8 years old post.

              Without that system, art community will turn into trend chasing, maximalizing for engagement instead of personal uniqueness. This already happens on Twitter, Bluesky, and Instagram.

              Even if Pixelfed had the algorithm, it is not a solution, as it was never meant to accomodate variation of post like proper art platform.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Svar
              • Svar som emne
              Login for at svare
              • Ældste til nyeste
              • Nyeste til ældste
              • Most Votes


              • Log ind

              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

              • Login or register to search.
              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              Graciously hosted by data.coop
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Hjem
              • Seneste
              • Etiketter
              • Populære
              • Verden
              • Bruger
              • Grupper