Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. An interesting read…

An interesting read…

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
brainneurosciencesciencebiologytech
4 Indlæg 2 Posters 21 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • metin@graphics.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    metin@graphics.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    metin@graphics.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    An interesting read…

    Only What Is Alive Can Be Conscious

    https://www.noemamag.com/only-what-is-alive-can-be-conscious

    #brain #neuroscience #science #biology #tech #technology #BigTech #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #LLM #LLMs #MachineLearning #GenAI #generativeAI #AISlop #Fuck_AI #Meta #Google #NVIDIA #gemini #OpenAI #ChatGPT #anthropic #claude

    metin@graphics.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • metin@graphics.socialM metin@graphics.social

      An interesting read…

      Only What Is Alive Can Be Conscious

      https://www.noemamag.com/only-what-is-alive-can-be-conscious

      #brain #neuroscience #science #biology #tech #technology #BigTech #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #LLM #LLMs #MachineLearning #GenAI #generativeAI #AISlop #Fuck_AI #Meta #Google #NVIDIA #gemini #OpenAI #ChatGPT #anthropic #claude

      metin@graphics.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      metin@graphics.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      metin@graphics.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      This might also be of interest to @albertcardona and @troy_s ☝️🙂

      albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • metin@graphics.socialM metin@graphics.social

        This might also be of interest to @albertcardona and @troy_s ☝️🙂

        albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
        albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
        albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @metin @troy_s

        Thanks, indeed, a nice summary of key takeaways from Anil Seth's essay https://www.noemamag.com/the-mythology-of-conscious-ai/ There's a lot to agree with there, including all the assumptions and bad metaphors that those who equate brains with computers repeatedly fall into.

        A few points that come to mind:

        * The software/hardware separation isn't as clean in computers either, from the CPU microcode to the OS that it runs. In humans, I don't have an analogy for microcode, but languages change the way we perceive the world, and those of us who speak multiple languages do feel sometimes that we express a different character when speaking in a different language.

        * On time, computers operating under real-time constraints are a lot closer to what brains do. The optimal outcome is not the best possible one or a designated one, but rather, that which can do the job in the time and resources allotted.

        * Operating systems, and broadly most software, operates on an event dispatch loop, whereby the system awaits an event and then reacts, followed by a restart of the loop body. Having the loop not stop is a key characteristic of our cerebral cortices, where most inputs to any one neuron arrive from other cortical neurons, with as little as about 6% of inputs to some select neurons (in layer 4) arriving from external sensory stimuli via the thalamus (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cne.22133 ) . A recurrent neural network is not that different, conceptually, bridging the huge distance of self-driven input seeking.

        * Biological systems are entropically favored https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08374

        * The latest technology is never a good metaphor for the brain, as Matthew Cobb's book details over and over: https://profilebooks.com/work/the-idea-of-the-brain/

        #neuroscience

        metin@graphics.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

          @metin @troy_s

          Thanks, indeed, a nice summary of key takeaways from Anil Seth's essay https://www.noemamag.com/the-mythology-of-conscious-ai/ There's a lot to agree with there, including all the assumptions and bad metaphors that those who equate brains with computers repeatedly fall into.

          A few points that come to mind:

          * The software/hardware separation isn't as clean in computers either, from the CPU microcode to the OS that it runs. In humans, I don't have an analogy for microcode, but languages change the way we perceive the world, and those of us who speak multiple languages do feel sometimes that we express a different character when speaking in a different language.

          * On time, computers operating under real-time constraints are a lot closer to what brains do. The optimal outcome is not the best possible one or a designated one, but rather, that which can do the job in the time and resources allotted.

          * Operating systems, and broadly most software, operates on an event dispatch loop, whereby the system awaits an event and then reacts, followed by a restart of the loop body. Having the loop not stop is a key characteristic of our cerebral cortices, where most inputs to any one neuron arrive from other cortical neurons, with as little as about 6% of inputs to some select neurons (in layer 4) arriving from external sensory stimuli via the thalamus (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cne.22133 ) . A recurrent neural network is not that different, conceptually, bridging the huge distance of self-driven input seeking.

          * Biological systems are entropically favored https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08374

          * The latest technology is never a good metaphor for the brain, as Matthew Cobb's book details over and over: https://profilebooks.com/work/the-idea-of-the-brain/

          #neuroscience

          metin@graphics.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          metin@graphics.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          metin@graphics.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @albertcardona @troy_s Very interesting, thanks! I've got a lot to read this evening. 😃👍

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gambolputte@expressional.socialG gambolputte@expressional.social shared this topic
          Svar
          • Svar som emne
          Login for at svare
          • Ældste til nyeste
          • Nyeste til ældste
          • Most Votes


          • Log ind

          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          Graciously hosted by data.coop
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Hjem
          • Seneste
          • Etiketter
          • Populære
          • Verden
          • Bruger
          • Grupper