Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Let me get this straight...

Let me get this straight...

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
60 Indlæg 23 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

    @tdpsk @Mer__edith
    The problem is that such content is not included in unencrypted backups. So we mortals can't even confirm this, as we don't have access to full-device exploit tools such as Cellebrite.

    tdpsk@sueden.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tdpsk@sueden.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tdpsk@sueden.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #40

    @wdormann @Mer__edith from what I understand it was forensically recounstructed from storage, the database itself is non-persistent (on the software layer). So something Apple could solve in a future update, e.g. by regularly properly wiping that part of storage.

    wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tdpsk@sueden.socialT tdpsk@sueden.social

      @wdormann @Mer__edith from what I understand it was forensically recounstructed from storage, the database itself is non-persistent (on the software layer). So something Apple could solve in a future update, e.g. by regularly properly wiping that part of storage.

      wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
      wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
      wdormann@infosec.exchange
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #41

      @tdpsk @Mer__edith
      Right, why is this data persistent at all?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

        @Mer__edith
        On the macOS side of things, we have confirmation that Signal notification contents get stored, even for disappearing messages

        iOS sadly offers less visibility into what's going on. But the FBI probably appreciates that it's happening there too.

        The default notification setting for Signal (on both iOS and macOS) ensures that potentially sensitive information leaks out of the Signal app. This is unfortunate.

        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
        wdormann@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #42

        @Mer__edith
        From elsewhere on the interwebs:

        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

          @Mer__edith
          From elsewhere on the interwebs:

          wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
          wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
          wdormann@infosec.exchange
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #43

          @Mer__edith
          From a worse place on the interwebs.
          Implying:
          Signal message content being present in Apple Notifications database even after Signal itself is deleted is apparently expected and fine.

          Signal message content being present for self-deleting messages is not (in their minds).

          🤔

          kobold@orthographieanarchist.deK awkwardturing@infosec.exchangeA fritzadalis@infosec.exchangeF wdormann@infosec.exchangeW buherator@infosec.placeB 5 Replies Last reply
          0
          • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

            @Mer__edith
            From a worse place on the interwebs.
            Implying:
            Signal message content being present in Apple Notifications database even after Signal itself is deleted is apparently expected and fine.

            Signal message content being present for self-deleting messages is not (in their minds).

            🤔

            kobold@orthographieanarchist.deK This user is from outside of this forum
            kobold@orthographieanarchist.deK This user is from outside of this forum
            kobold@orthographieanarchist.de
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #44

            @wdormann @Mer__edith

            #enshittification

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

              @Mer__edith
              From a worse place on the interwebs.
              Implying:
              Signal message content being present in Apple Notifications database even after Signal itself is deleted is apparently expected and fine.

              Signal message content being present for self-deleting messages is not (in their minds).

              🤔

              awkwardturing@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              awkwardturing@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              awkwardturing@infosec.exchange
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #45

              @wdormann that's exactly what I was worried about. It suggests that whatever the/an app sends to the notification service gets stored, since OS notification settings would most likely apply only after and not before storage. That's .. creepy but not too surprising.

              Thanks for raising awareness!

              wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • awkwardturing@infosec.exchangeA awkwardturing@infosec.exchange

                @wdormann that's exactly what I was worried about. It suggests that whatever the/an app sends to the notification service gets stored, since OS notification settings would most likely apply only after and not before storage. That's .. creepy but not too surprising.

                Thanks for raising awareness!

                wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                wdormann@infosec.exchange
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #46

                @AwkwardTuring
                It's easy to fix. It's just somewhat surprising to me that Signal ships with obviously insecure defaults.

                awkwardturing@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                  @AwkwardTuring
                  It's easy to fix. It's just somewhat surprising to me that Signal ships with obviously insecure defaults.

                  awkwardturing@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  awkwardturing@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  awkwardturing@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #47

                  @wdormann it is. I'm only worried about all the apps (or users for that matter) that rely on OS' built-in notification settings instead of more granular in-app-settings.

                  Again: not too surprising but leaves a sour taste nonetheless.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                    @Mer__edith
                    From a worse place on the interwebs.
                    Implying:
                    Signal message content being present in Apple Notifications database even after Signal itself is deleted is apparently expected and fine.

                    Signal message content being present for self-deleting messages is not (in their minds).

                    🤔

                    fritzadalis@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fritzadalis@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fritzadalis@infosec.exchange
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #48

                    @wdormann @Mer__edith
                    My expectation as a user would be that the os stores notifications until they're read, unless I make a change otherwise. It seems like they're stored 'forever'.

                    wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • fritzadalis@infosec.exchangeF fritzadalis@infosec.exchange

                      @wdormann @Mer__edith
                      My expectation as a user would be that the os stores notifications until they're read, unless I make a change otherwise. It seems like they're stored 'forever'.

                      wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wdormann@infosec.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #49

                      @FritzAdalis @Mer__edith
                      Right. And especially given the black box nature of the iOS platform, it would be nice for some official statements from the Apple and/or Signal side of things.

                      Nobody wants to be surprised by things like this.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                        @Mer__edith
                        From a worse place on the interwebs.
                        Implying:
                        Signal message content being present in Apple Notifications database even after Signal itself is deleted is apparently expected and fine.

                        Signal message content being present for self-deleting messages is not (in their minds).

                        🤔

                        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wdormann@infosec.exchange
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #50

                        @Mer__edith
                        Note the precise use of deleted messages here. When you uninstall the Signal app, that doesn't flag it's messages as "deleted" so that Apple can remove them from the notifications database. (If Apple would ever comply with Signal's demands. iOS (and macOS) don't have such a feature)

                        I don't think that this behavior maps up with users' expectations of the software. And for Signal to ship knowingly with a default setting that violates user expectations for a secure messaging app, well, I don't like it.

                        Don't get me wrong, I love the Signal product, and I've donated financially to it multiple times. But this ain't right.

                        alesandroortiz@infosec.exchangeA wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 2 Replies Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                          @Mer__edith
                          From a worse place on the interwebs.
                          Implying:
                          Signal message content being present in Apple Notifications database even after Signal itself is deleted is apparently expected and fine.

                          Signal message content being present for self-deleting messages is not (in their minds).

                          🤔

                          buherator@infosec.placeB This user is from outside of this forum
                          buherator@infosec.placeB This user is from outside of this forum
                          buherator@infosec.place
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #51
                          @wdormann As I understand they "knowing why" (as of now) doesn't imply this was *expected* behavior before.

                          I'd compare the persistent (not self-deleting) messages dilemma to secure deletion: below the next architectural boundary you can't really decide what's happening to your data ("were the bits of that file really deleted from the disk?"), but in special cases you take extra steps to prevent leaks ("let's overwrite a bunch of times, hopefully it helps").

                          @Mer__edith
                          wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • buherator@infosec.placeB buherator@infosec.place
                            @wdormann As I understand they "knowing why" (as of now) doesn't imply this was *expected* behavior before.

                            I'd compare the persistent (not self-deleting) messages dilemma to secure deletion: below the next architectural boundary you can't really decide what's happening to your data ("were the bits of that file really deleted from the disk?"), but in special cases you take extra steps to prevent leaks ("let's overwrite a bunch of times, hopefully it helps").

                            @Mer__edith
                            wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wdormann@infosec.exchange
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #52

                            @buherator @Mer__edith

                            A path that would make me feel more comfortable would be:

                            We've changed the default setting in Signal to not put message bodies in the (external-to-Signal) notifications database. At least until the dust has settled.

                            But no, the battle that is being chosen is:
                            We are pleading with Apple to have self-deleting messages not be permanently retained in the notifications database.

                            I get that security vs. usability are usually at odds with each other. But I suppose I'd like a bit more transparency here.

                            buherator@infosec.placeB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                              @buherator @Mer__edith

                              A path that would make me feel more comfortable would be:

                              We've changed the default setting in Signal to not put message bodies in the (external-to-Signal) notifications database. At least until the dust has settled.

                              But no, the battle that is being chosen is:
                              We are pleading with Apple to have self-deleting messages not be permanently retained in the notifications database.

                              I get that security vs. usability are usually at odds with each other. But I suppose I'd like a bit more transparency here.

                              buherator@infosec.placeB This user is from outside of this forum
                              buherator@infosec.placeB This user is from outside of this forum
                              buherator@infosec.place
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #53
                              @wdormann I'd agree with that, but I don't know what level of control apps have on mobile.

                              @Mer__edith
                              wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • buherator@infosec.placeB buherator@infosec.place
                                @wdormann I'd agree with that, but I don't know what level of control apps have on mobile.

                                @Mer__edith
                                wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                                wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                                wdormann@infosec.exchange
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #54

                                @buherator @Mer__edith
                                Signal has 100% control of this.
                                The screenshot is from the Signal iOS app settings.

                                Signal can't play the "We can't do anything about this" card. It's their default setting that is less secure than it should be.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                                  @Mer__edith
                                  Note the precise use of deleted messages here. When you uninstall the Signal app, that doesn't flag it's messages as "deleted" so that Apple can remove them from the notifications database. (If Apple would ever comply with Signal's demands. iOS (and macOS) don't have such a feature)

                                  I don't think that this behavior maps up with users' expectations of the software. And for Signal to ship knowingly with a default setting that violates user expectations for a secure messaging app, well, I don't like it.

                                  Don't get me wrong, I love the Signal product, and I've donated financially to it multiple times. But this ain't right.

                                  alesandroortiz@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alesandroortiz@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alesandroortiz@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #55

                                  @wdormann @Mer__edith FWIW, at least some Android flavors have Notification History feature too. e.g. my Samsung phones have had it for years.

                                  In UI it only shows 24 hours of history and doesn't show uninstalled apps, but not sure if older or uninstalled app notifications are actually deleted behind the scenes.

                                  I agree Signal should have No Content by default. Also needs clear warning about risks when relaxing settings.

                                  alesandroortiz@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • alesandroortiz@infosec.exchangeA alesandroortiz@infosec.exchange

                                    @wdormann @Mer__edith FWIW, at least some Android flavors have Notification History feature too. e.g. my Samsung phones have had it for years.

                                    In UI it only shows 24 hours of history and doesn't show uninstalled apps, but not sure if older or uninstalled app notifications are actually deleted behind the scenes.

                                    I agree Signal should have No Content by default. Also needs clear warning about risks when relaxing settings.

                                    alesandroortiz@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    alesandroortiz@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    alesandroortiz@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #56

                                    @wdormann Now I'm wondering how Windows behaves here too. Can't test now but IIRC it does store notifs for at least a few days.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                                      Let me get this straight...

                                      The default setting for Signal on an iPhone allows law enforcement to see the content of all incoming messages, even after the app has been deleted? 🤔

                                      https://www.404media.co/fbi-extracts-suspects-deleted-signal-messages-saved-in-iphone-notification-database-2/

                                      schtaks@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      schtaks@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      schtaks@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #57

                                      @wdormann I've moved to telepathy. Use this link to start chatting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                                        @Mer__edith
                                        Note the precise use of deleted messages here. When you uninstall the Signal app, that doesn't flag it's messages as "deleted" so that Apple can remove them from the notifications database. (If Apple would ever comply with Signal's demands. iOS (and macOS) don't have such a feature)

                                        I don't think that this behavior maps up with users' expectations of the software. And for Signal to ship knowingly with a default setting that violates user expectations for a secure messaging app, well, I don't like it.

                                        Don't get me wrong, I love the Signal product, and I've donated financially to it multiple times. But this ain't right.

                                        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wdormann@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #58

                                        @Mer__edith
                                        This apparently is addressed as CVE-2026-28950

                                        What is unclear is what is meant by

                                        Notifications marked for deletion could be unexpectedly retained on the device

                                        Is this only disappearing messages in Signal? Or any notification that has been acknowledged? 🤔

                                        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

                                          @Mer__edith
                                          This apparently is addressed as CVE-2026-28950

                                          What is unclear is what is meant by

                                          Notifications marked for deletion could be unexpectedly retained on the device

                                          Is this only disappearing messages in Signal? Or any notification that has been acknowledged? 🤔

                                          wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          wdormann@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #59

                                          @Mer__edith
                                          Apparently it applies to deleted apps as well.

                                          wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper