Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Only the best and brightest are working for Anthropic.

Only the best and brightest are working for Anthropic.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
claude
59 Indlæg 30 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • aspragg@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    aspragg@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    aspragg@ohai.social
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #21

    @Bender @adardis @Mabande And a few others too

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

      @joshg I opposed @adardis's use of "_very_ rigorous" as some kind of credential for Askell's skills as a philosopher.
      Yes, rigor is needed for getting a PhD. But. It does not guarantee that someone has understood their field: one seldom cited thesis re. ethics doesn't necessarily mean she is qualified to define life/consciousness.
      (as paralleled by the unfortunate number of PhD's who are proponents of eugenics)

      Especially as she's a follower of "effective altruism".

      And yes, DAIR are _on_ it.

      joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
      joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
      joshg@mathstodon.xyz
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #22

      @Mabande
      oof. yeah if she's an "effective altruism" follower, that's a lack of something all right.

      amazing how someone can be incredibly thorough in justifying something so obviously horrible.
      @adardis

      fgbjr@indieweb.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

        Only the best and brightest are working for Anthropic.

        #Claude #AI

        skua@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        skua@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        skua@mastodon.social
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #23

        @Mabande

        Faeces were cleaned off a light switch this morning.

        The combination of a unique microbiome, the still live binary switch and the macro "Schrodinger's Cat"-like possibility of a quantum event deciding whether the cleaning liquid provided a pathway to earth through the cleaner does, I feel, amount to an entirely new entity having been formed.

        How are we to understand how that entity felt about being destroyed?

        Pro tip: Better genAI prompts if you don't wash after wiping.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR rubinjoni@mastodon.social

          @CAWguy @Mabande @Kierkegaanks Shitposters, but not very good ones.

          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
          davidgerard@circumstances.run
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #24

          @rubinjoni @CAWguy @Mabande @Kierkegaanks@beige.party shit posters

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ joshg@mathstodon.xyz

            @Mabande
            oof. yeah if she's an "effective altruism" follower, that's a lack of something all right.

            amazing how someone can be incredibly thorough in justifying something so obviously horrible.
            @adardis

            fgbjr@indieweb.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            fgbjr@indieweb.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            fgbjr@indieweb.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #25

            @joshg @Mabande @adardis Philosophers can be wrong about things and still be philosophers.

            dpnash@c.imD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • koantig@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
              koantig@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
              koantig@mamot.fr
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #26

              @Mabande OMG, thank you! I thought I'd never find this tweet again!
              Properly archived this time.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rollspelosofen@mastodon.nuR rollspelosofen@mastodon.nu

                @Mabande It’s a logical reasoning model with polite UI. That’s neither a human or a machine. It’s a software solution

                marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                marjolica@social.linux.pizza
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #27

                @rollspelosofen @Mabande I'm sorry I have to differ.
                LLMs don't reason.
                And there a difference between obsequiousness and being polite.

                rollspelosofen@mastodon.nuR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

                  Only the best and brightest are working for Anthropic.

                  #Claude #AI

                  illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  illuminatus@mstdn.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #28

                  @Mabande Whenever I read this, I have to seriously reconsider if Mao's idea of sending the youth to the country to learn the life of the peasants was so wrong…

                  mabande@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

                    Only the best and brightest are working for Anthropic.

                    #Claude #AI

                    zhksh@sigmoid.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zhksh@sigmoid.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zhksh@sigmoid.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #29

                    @Mabande Avery def should one of them

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • petealexharris@mastodon.scotP petealexharris@mastodon.scot

                      @adardis @Mabande

                      My instinct says it's very hard to get paid from a philosophy degree.

                      celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                      celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                      celesteh@hachyderm.io
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #30

                      @petealexharris @adardis @Mabande

                      People with philosophy undergraduate degrees have very high mid career income, but the more advanced the degree, the lower the income gets (this is also true for music). The reason is that most don't work as philophers.

                      If somebody is offering super high wages to somebody not already famous, that should be a clue that something is amiss. But, I mean, who *wants* to see the problem.

                      (Nobody ever uses composers for evil, so its very easy for me to say all of this, with my music PhD.)

                      petealexharris@mastodon.scotP timotimo@peoplemaking.gamesT 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

                        Only the best and brightest are working for Anthropic.

                        #Claude #AI

                        float13@masto.hackers.townF This user is from outside of this forum
                        float13@masto.hackers.townF This user is from outside of this forum
                        float13@masto.hackers.town
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #31

                        @Mabande

                        Mel Brooks, as usual, was way ahead of us...

                        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wvEyDRsr2Gs

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • celesteh@hachyderm.ioC celesteh@hachyderm.io

                          @petealexharris @adardis @Mabande

                          People with philosophy undergraduate degrees have very high mid career income, but the more advanced the degree, the lower the income gets (this is also true for music). The reason is that most don't work as philophers.

                          If somebody is offering super high wages to somebody not already famous, that should be a clue that something is amiss. But, I mean, who *wants* to see the problem.

                          (Nobody ever uses composers for evil, so its very easy for me to say all of this, with my music PhD.)

                          petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                          petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
                          petealexharris@mastodon.scot
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #32

                          @celesteh @adardis @Mabande

                          If it looked like there was more money in using composers for evil, you can be sure they would Find A Way.

                          mabande@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ joshg@mathstodon.xyz

                            @Mabande
                            You don't get a PhD without rigor.

                            We don't need to attack a philosopher's credentials or skill here. The problem isn't the philosophy, it's the engineers who are providing inaccurate technical explanations to the philosopher. This is why we need to infuse the humanities into our engineering programs - we need technical philosophers to call this bullshit out.

                            (And we have them - see the DAIR group, for example.)
                            @adardis

                            joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            joshg@mathstodon.xyz
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #33

                            @Mabande
                            since this thread is making the rounds again, y'all who read this far get a link to my own amateur-but-carefully-thought-through math and philosophy on why Anthropic and others are provably full of shit: https://thoughtlost.org/nosingularity/

                            @adardis

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM marjolica@social.linux.pizza

                              @rollspelosofen @Mabande I'm sorry I have to differ.
                              LLMs don't reason.
                              And there a difference between obsequiousness and being polite.

                              rollspelosofen@mastodon.nuR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rollspelosofen@mastodon.nuR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rollspelosofen@mastodon.nu
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #34

                              @marjolica @Mabande By ”logical reasoning” I was referring to the common ”if… else…” reasoning statements that all modern software use. And I was using polite very broadly here. 🙂

                              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • petealexharris@mastodon.scotP petealexharris@mastodon.scot

                                @celesteh @adardis @Mabande

                                If it looked like there was more money in using composers for evil, you can be sure they would Find A Way.

                                mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mabande@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #35

                                @petealexharris @celesteh @adardis The IRL Darth Vader wannabe got to have his cool soundtrack...

                                celesteh@hachyderm.ioC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • rollspelosofen@mastodon.nuR rollspelosofen@mastodon.nu

                                  @marjolica @Mabande By ”logical reasoning” I was referring to the common ”if… else…” reasoning statements that all modern software use. And I was using polite very broadly here. 🙂

                                  marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  marjolica@social.linux.pizza
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #36

                                  @rollspelosofen @Mabande I don't think LLMs use if .. else logic, though decision trees are a different form of AI and largely work that way (I've written them myself in the past).
                                  LLMs just include a whole set of statements in parallel, including your prompt, their billions of weights based on data they were trained on and imperative guard rails and meta instructions set by their trainers. Of course as a stochastic parrot they don't always even prioritise their guard rails and often let information in their training data override what you tell them to do in the prompt.

                                  rollspelosofen@mastodon.nuR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • celesteh@hachyderm.ioC celesteh@hachyderm.io

                                    @petealexharris @adardis @Mabande

                                    People with philosophy undergraduate degrees have very high mid career income, but the more advanced the degree, the lower the income gets (this is also true for music). The reason is that most don't work as philophers.

                                    If somebody is offering super high wages to somebody not already famous, that should be a clue that something is amiss. But, I mean, who *wants* to see the problem.

                                    (Nobody ever uses composers for evil, so its very easy for me to say all of this, with my music PhD.)

                                    timotimo@peoplemaking.gamesT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    timotimo@peoplemaking.gamesT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    timotimo@peoplemaking.games
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #37

                                    @celesteh @petealexharris @adardis @Mabande smash cut to the composer who was horrified to find out that his cheerful tunes were being used for torture …

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM marjolica@social.linux.pizza

                                      @rollspelosofen @Mabande I don't think LLMs use if .. else logic, though decision trees are a different form of AI and largely work that way (I've written them myself in the past).
                                      LLMs just include a whole set of statements in parallel, including your prompt, their billions of weights based on data they were trained on and imperative guard rails and meta instructions set by their trainers. Of course as a stochastic parrot they don't always even prioritise their guard rails and often let information in their training data override what you tell them to do in the prompt.

                                      rollspelosofen@mastodon.nuR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rollspelosofen@mastodon.nuR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rollspelosofen@mastodon.nu
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #38

                                      @marjolica @Mabande Okay. 👍

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • adardis@mstdn.socialA adardis@mstdn.social

                                        @Mabande Have a look at her Wikipedia page. If it's accurate, she's a very rigorous philosopher.

                                        I'm tempted to say "no bullshit there" but it's possible to be rigorous and to spout bullshit.

                                        My instinct says she has/they have other reasons for saying the things they do.

                                        adx@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        adx@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        adx@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #39

                                        @adardis @Mabande A lot of very smart people are wrong about a lot of stuff even especially within their field. After a certain people you get high on your own stash.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

                                          @petealexharris @celesteh @adardis The IRL Darth Vader wannabe got to have his cool soundtrack...

                                          celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          celesteh@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          celesteh@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #40

                                          @Mabande @petealexharris @adardis sadly no

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper