🇩🇪EU-Parlament lässt #Chatkontrolle 1.0 trotz Mehrheits‑Nein (314:276) passieren – Massenscans privater Chats bis 2028 erlaubt.

[kalauer@digitalcourage.social]

@echo_pbreyer Damit haben sich die Parlamentarier, die dafür gestimmt haben, zu Handlangern der US-BigTech Konzerne sowie der undemokratischen EU-Kommission und des Rates gemacht!
Mein Ansehen der Institutionen der Europäischen Union sinkt immer weiter.

[lightspeed@mstdn.social]

@echo_pbreyer Zie hierboven. Chat Control is (weer) terug.

@bert_hubert@mastodon.nl @bert_hubert@eupolicy.social @xot @Frederik_Borgesius

[karmalakas@mastodon.social]

@echo_pbreyer wait... Why TF vote at all? ‍️

[smallcircles@social.coop]

@echo_pbreyer

> “The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy. Our children are the real losers in this undemocratic process. The passage of a genuine, permanent child protection regulation is now in serious jeopardy. The Council will never agree to a desperately needed paradigm shift as long as they can simply stick to the old approach of suspicionless scanning at the whim of the tech industry.”

So true. I am very pro-EU. Except these shenanigans make me get underbelly feelings of "FUCK EU, let it all go to shite then" (to say it diplomatically). Well.. take a deep breath. On to fighting off #ChatControl 2.0.

But also: Who are these freaking lobbyists that keep pushing this shebang against the wishes of the people, at all cost? More naming and shaming, please.

[npub1mwkpvd2snl2tlxtmtgvrj2vr5mwf2nmuynua4a0jmzgtkvwt93rq8pd09j@momostr.pink]

Burn it all down.

[clickhere@mastodon.ie]

@echo_pbreyer Are the next steps through the courts?

If the Data Retention Directive (Directive 2006/24/EC) couldn't survive _Digital Rights Ireland and Others_ (C‑293/12 and C‑594/12), surely this is in many ways many times worse?

#ChatControl #Surveillance #CJEU

[forthy42@mastodon.net2o.de]

@echo_pbreyer Immerhin bleibt es dabei, dass verschlüsselte Messages nicht gescannt werden. Unverschlüsselte sind ohnehin zu unsicher.

[cytro@mastodon.de]

@echo_pbreyer
Wieso geht das trotz "Nein"??? Kann mir das jemand erklären?

[echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social]

@cytro Es wäre eine absolute Mehrheit nötig gewesen, siehe Link im Post

[echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social]

@clickhere A lawsuit is pending, but it takes ages

[nikthechampiongr@ohai.social]

@smallcircles @echo_pbreyer Yea this sucks, the eu is often does wonderful things but it is also deeply flawed as seen here. The only fix for it is treaty reforms and unfortunately it is unlikely that member states will agree on such reforms any time soon...

[andrewblasco@masto.es]

@echo_pbreyer What kind of fictional democracy is the European Parliament if the majority vote against it means nothing!?

[sirjofri@pleroma.envs.net]

@echo_pbreyer
Richtig cool. Absolute Mehrheit fordern, obwohl viele gar nicht da sind...
@cytro

[davidculley@hachyderm.io]

@andrewblasco https://mastodon.ar.al/@aral/116832760661859083

[andrewblasco@masto.es]

@davidculley So they can simply override EU parliament vote?

[virgil_tibbs@norden.social]

@echo_pbreyer

sorry.. ich verstehe die Fragestellung nciht
https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/195788

"Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse"

ist "ja" ein "JA" zur Kontrolle ?

[friedhelmfeldmann@mastodon.social]

@echo_pbreyer

Tolles EU-Parlament, das ja angeblich so demokratisch ist.

Aber in anderen Ländern hoch einen auf Moralisch machen.

[clickhere@mastodon.ie]

@echo_pbreyer Thank you. Yes, it's completely frustrating.

[frankobert@nrw.social]

@echo_pbreyer
Da sieht man, wie wichtig EU Abgeordnete Abstimmungen nehmen.
Relative Mehrheit reicht nicht.

[civitz@mastodon.uno]

@echo_pbreyer Tried my best by emailing and calling my MEPs. Of course most of them ignored me or they weren't in office.

It's frustrating.

Thanks for being on the right side of this s**t.