Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
65 Indlæg 40 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

    DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

    DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

    Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

    dentaku@fnordon.deD This user is from outside of this forum
    dentaku@fnordon.deD This user is from outside of this forum
    dentaku@fnordon.de
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #3

    @jwildeboer If I look hard I can see it in the sidekiq queue latency metrics.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

      DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

      DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

      Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

      stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
      stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
      stefan@stefanbohacek.online
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #4

      @jwildeboer I get people wanting to feel good about their decision to be here instead of on Bluesky, but given all the work going into building up independent ATProto infrastructure, I think we'll be better off focusing our energy elsewhere.

      https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan/116126040489956521

      stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ sesivany@social.vivaldi.netS 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

        @jwildeboer I get people wanting to feel good about their decision to be here instead of on Bluesky, but given all the work going into building up independent ATProto infrastructure, I think we'll be better off focusing our energy elsewhere.

        https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan/116126040489956521

        stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
        stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
        stefan@stefanbohacek.online
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #5

        @jwildeboer Eg. because of the growing decentralization, one issue that is coming up over there is people linking to their post from non-Bluesky apps.

        And you can't use the "copy the URL into the search" trick we have on here.

        So them making progress on decentralization is a double-edged sword, where the fediverse could have an advantage, if we continue working on smoothing some of the user experience challenges related to decentralization.

        Just a thought.

        jesuisatire@social.tchncs.deJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

          @jwildeboer I get people wanting to feel good about their decision to be here instead of on Bluesky, but given all the work going into building up independent ATProto infrastructure, I think we'll be better off focusing our energy elsewhere.

          https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan/116126040489956521

          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #6

          @stefan Everybody should invest their time and energy where they feel comfortable. For me that is ActivityPub. My observation is that ATProto/Atmosphere/BlueSky still has a lot of catchup to do to reach the level of decentralisation the Fediverse already has. Is all.

          stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

            @stefan Everybody should invest their time and energy where they feel comfortable. For me that is ActivityPub. My observation is that ATProto/Atmosphere/BlueSky still has a lot of catchup to do to reach the level of decentralisation the Fediverse already has. Is all.

            stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
            stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
            stefan@stefanbohacek.online
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #7

            @jwildeboer

            "Everybody should invest their time and energy where they feel comfortable. "

            I agree!

            "still has a lot of catchup"

            My point is just that there is enough momentum for things to change drastically even over the next year.

            Won't harp on this further, I just don't want people to get caught by surprise.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

              DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

              DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

              Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

              maddad@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
              maddad@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
              maddad@mastodon.world
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #8

              @jwildeboer

              No issues so far on mastodon.world

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #9

                And to be very clear about this: DDoS attacks are stupid and cause a lot of work. My sympathy goes to the sysadmins on every side, including those at the upstream network providers who have to deal with this, often at weird times. It is exhausting work and I really don't want you to have to do it, but hey, that's the world we live in, unfortunately. Sys Admin Hug!

                kkarhan@jorts.horseK jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                  DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                  DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                  Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                  linux@mivatter.comL This user is from outside of this forum
                  linux@mivatter.comL This user is from outside of this forum
                  linux@mivatter.com
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #10
                  @jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                  This is why people should span out across the Fediverse.

                  We have this decentralized network, but if most people are in the same place you can take most of it out in one move. Clustering on one large site makes it the weakest link.
                  newtraditionalists@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                    DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                    DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                    Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                    kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kkarhan@jorts.horse
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #11

                    @jwildeboer it's only decentralized if there's no #SinglePointOfFailure.

                    Same goes for anything else:

                    • Regardless if #XMPP+#OMEMO
                      • If say 5222.de is down the only ones noticing are their users and their contacts.
                    • Or #PGP/MIME.
                      • And that is it's strenght.

                    In fact #eMail is so powerful that @delta / #deltaChat is getting popular in #Russia because even if they wanted to, (they don't, obviously!) they couldn't comply with #Roskomnadnozr's #Cyberfascism!

                    kkarhan@jorts.horseK jesuisatire@social.tchncs.deJ 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                      And to be very clear about this: DDoS attacks are stupid and cause a lot of work. My sympathy goes to the sysadmins on every side, including those at the upstream network providers who have to deal with this, often at weird times. It is exhausting work and I really don't want you to have to do it, but hey, that's the world we live in, unfortunately. Sys Admin Hug!

                      kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kkarhan@jorts.horse
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #12

                      @jwildeboer In most cases they are so rampant that #Blackholing said traffic at the IX level works pretty well…

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                        DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                        DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                        Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                        mdt@mast.latM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdt@mast.latM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdt@mast.lat
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #13

                        @jwildeboer @CAPETOK he aquí la explicación de lo que te quejabas en la mañana con respecto a mastodon

                        capetok@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kkarhan@jorts.horseK kkarhan@jorts.horse

                          @jwildeboer it's only decentralized if there's no #SinglePointOfFailure.

                          Same goes for anything else:

                          • Regardless if #XMPP+#OMEMO
                            • If say 5222.de is down the only ones noticing are their users and their contacts.
                          • Or #PGP/MIME.
                            • And that is it's strenght.

                          In fact #eMail is so powerful that @delta / #deltaChat is getting popular in #Russia because even if they wanted to, (they don't, obviously!) they couldn't comply with #Roskomnadnozr's #Cyberfascism!

                          kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kkarhan@jorts.horse
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #14

                          @jwildeboer I mean, since #eMail does allow for "Store & Forward" setups (With early Networks literally mailing tapes and then uucp'ing #eMails locally,) I'd not be surprised if @delta is used that way by many dissidents instead paper to communicate externally.

                          • Heck I'm shure folks at #AsiaPress's #RimjinGang are exploring it for #airgapped communication along their #SneakerNet.
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • linux@mivatter.comL linux@mivatter.com
                            @jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                            This is why people should span out across the Fediverse.

                            We have this decentralized network, but if most people are in the same place you can take most of it out in one move. Clustering on one large site makes it the weakest link.
                            newtraditionalists@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            newtraditionalists@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                            newtraditionalists@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #15

                            @Linux @jwildeboer this is interesting to ponder and quite true. Also, may be an argument for multiple accounts on multiple instances.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                              DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                              DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                              Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                              agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              agowa338@chaos.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #16

                              @jwildeboer Apparently not the entire BlueSky network went down because of this. Someone yesterday pointed out that they still were able to post and do stuff with people on other instances BUT that the main issue is the BlueSky network demands that everyone has a full view on their own instance. As you get replies by them referencing the parent post and not the parent referencing the children...

                              So I assume BlueSky is more like the Usenet than like Mastodon in the end.

                              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

                                @jwildeboer Apparently not the entire BlueSky network went down because of this. Someone yesterday pointed out that they still were able to post and do stuff with people on other instances BUT that the main issue is the BlueSky network demands that everyone has a full view on their own instance. As you get replies by them referencing the parent post and not the parent referencing the children...

                                So I assume BlueSky is more like the Usenet than like Mastodon in the end.

                                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #17

                                @agowa338 The TL;DR for me is that the current ATProto/Atmosphere architecture still contains centralised elements that stand in the way of full federation. My suspicion is that this is by design.

                                jesuisatire@social.tchncs.deJ tdr@zechenlicht.ruhr.gebiet.euT 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                  DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                                  DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                                  Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                                  cannedtuna@techhub.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cannedtuna@techhub.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cannedtuna@techhub.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #18

                                  @jwildeboer saw mastodon.social was down, just had to flip to my backup account. 🤷‍♂️ it’s that easy. Gotta love federation.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                    DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                                    DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                                    Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                                    bweller@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bweller@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    bweller@mstdn.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #19

                                    @jwildeboer there wuz ddos?

                                    😲

                                    hadnt noticed. real decentralization is great 😁

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                      DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                                      DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                                      Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                                      darth_hideout@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      darth_hideout@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      darth_hideout@mas.to
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #20

                                      @jwildeboer

                                      👍

                                      There's still a network effect though. Half the accounts I follow or care about are down. But maybe incidents like this will inspire #Mastodon users to migrate off of mastodon.social.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                        DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                                        DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                                        Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                                        jesuisatire@social.tchncs.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jesuisatire@social.tchncs.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jesuisatire@social.tchncs.de
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #21

                                        @jwildeboer
                                        > You decide 🙂

                                        . . looks like a rhetorical question from over here ..

                                        btw
                                        You mean the mastodon.social users just realized that their death star isn't decentralized, leads the setup to an ad absurdum circumstance and will, as always, go down with their uninformed decision making?

                                        Do the Ddoser take credits for exposing reality or do they only accept satoshis?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                          DDos (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against BlueSky a few days ago: The whole network goes down.

                                          DDoS against mastodon.social today: Lots of users on that instance impacted, the rest of the Fediverse keeps on running, my instance doesn't really notice, messages will be queued up until mastodon.social is reachable again.

                                          Both networks claim to be decentralised and federated. You decide 🙂

                                          http_error_418@hachyderm.ioH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          http_error_418@hachyderm.ioH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          http_error_418@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #22

                                          @jwildeboer I wouldn't even have known if not for this post

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper