Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya all we need is a beer that doesn't make you fat but scientists "No! We want to know if there's life on Mars."
/s -
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya and prolific over sharers I would say...
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya And they certainly never 100% agree on anything
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya my mother is a scientist
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya
If you ask one to explain their work, it's often hard to get them to stop talking. -
@neuronakaya Corollary:
Anyone saying "(Phenomenon/Thing) defies physics" is about to get an earful from a physicist.
@redrummy unless it's a specific example of something that defies physics for educational purposes like Maxwell's daemon. @neuronakaya
-
A related joke (originally about engineers):
Scientists make terrible magicians because they always want to explain how the trick works before they show it to you.
@darth_hideout @neuronakaya That's because you won't understand how awesome it is otherwise...
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya the idea that scientists ‘don’t want you to know a fact’ is statistically incompatible with their behavior
they publish ~2.5m papers/yr, upload 200k+ preprints, make >3m figures, and generate so many supplements that journals added file‑size limits because people kept submitting appendices the size of small video games
i once heard of 14gb of raw data uploaded ‘in case someone might care.’
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya
Exactly. Most scientists seem more eager to share knowledge than hide it. -
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya in my experience the only thing scientists don’t want you to know is they put on mismatched socks this morning and they’re still going to tell you that anyway.
-
Perhaps a truer line might be
"Scientific journals don't want you to know this fact... without paying for it."
I recall seeing a scientist here saying how they're willing to provide free copies of their paper upon request, avoiding this cost to the reader.
This, of course, supports your hypothesis about scientists sharing.
@johnlogic @neuronakaya and will then spend the rest of the day sobbing with joy because someone else wanted to read their paper.
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
Oh, I know a LOT of scientists who don't want to know an important fact or two!
Fact 1: The genetic clock of a species and its line of ancestry is NOT automatically the same as its generation to generation mutation rate, and cannot be assumed to be so.
Fact 2: The 1,500 fossil individuals known form Africa between 2 & 4.5 million years old, all supposed to be nearer the human lineage than the chimp or human lineage, are not. Many are chimp or gorilla ancestors.
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya It's one of those statements that tries to sound really smart or secretive, but instantly conveys that whatever follows is just as humbug.
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
"We interviewed 10 brutally honest scientists and they all don't want you to know this one jaw dropping fact"
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya @EricLawton Oh really? Tell me more!
-
Perhaps a truer line might be
"Scientific journals don't want you to know this fact... without paying for it."
I recall seeing a scientist here saying how they're willing to provide free copies of their paper upon request, avoiding this cost to the reader.
This, of course, supports your hypothesis about scientists sharing.
I'll send you a PDF of one of mine if you'd like one!
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya On a tour of the museum of nature’s workshops and storage facility. …and spent thirty minutes talking with the mollusk expert. I could have been there for hours getting the excited brain dump from them.
-
@neuronakaya the idea that scientists ‘don’t want you to know a fact’ is statistically incompatible with their behavior
they publish ~2.5m papers/yr, upload 200k+ preprints, make >3m figures, and generate so many supplements that journals added file‑size limits because people kept submitting appendices the size of small video games
i once heard of 14gb of raw data uploaded ‘in case someone might care.’
@hvanleeuwen Scientists also know that gb means gram bits. You want GB, gigabytes.
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya that's usually just used in clickbait news article titles.
-
Anyone saying "Scientists don't want you to know this fact" has never met a scientist.
Scientists are famous oversharers.
@neuronakaya The other one is about scientific consensus. Science skeptics pretend there’s a cabal to present a united front. In reality, most scientists try their damndest to *disprove* accepted theories because that’s one very good way of making a name for yourself. Agreeing with everyone does nothing for your reputation. If a majority of scientists agree on anything — up to and including the color of the bloody sky — it’s because there’s no possible way to dispute the facts.
