Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
34 Indlæg 26 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • scaletheory@mastodon.socialS scaletheory@mastodon.social

    @andrewstroehlein

    Which site? Got more info on this?

    More and more we can't believe a word about anything since pizza gate, which smells like Minnesota daycare bullshit.

    scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    scaletheory@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #25

    @andrewstroehlein

    Never mind, got my answer:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

      "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

      That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW This user is from outside of this forum
      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW This user is from outside of this forum
      wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.host
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #26

      @andrewstroehlein Nope. "Why is any government on ANY private site?" is the question.

      utf_7@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

        "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

        That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

        sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sassinake@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #27

        @andrewstroehlein

        Leavitt: "What are children, really? What is consent, but some woke nonsense. Every one knows girls belong to their fathers, until he sells them to the highest bidder. That's what my Daddy, who art in Heaven, did with me, and I turned out fine!"

        /s

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

          @andrewstroehlein *child sexual abuse material (CSAM)

          Sex requires consent
          Children cannot consent
          Sexual imagery featuring any child is abuse material, not porn. There is no 'child porn'.

          I think this is important because phrases like this, and 'sex trafficking' or 'sex pest' minimise the crime and obscure perpetrators. We can and should hold media and commentators to account.

          copacetic@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
          copacetic@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
          copacetic@social.tchncs.de
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #28

          @noodlemaz @andrewstroehlein To me "child porn" sounds worse than a four letter acronym like "CSAM" and four full words is too long.

          noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tooden@aus.socialT tooden@aus.social

            @noodlemaz I didn't suggest it was. I had hoped you would see it as helpful, since the scum disseminating this material don't see it as such.

            noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
            noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
            noodlemaz@mstdn.games
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #29

            @Tooden well, per legal definitions, not all sexual abuse is rape. So I'm not sure how helpful it is to bundle various things under that term that has (relatively) clear and important applicability already. Hope that makes sense. I don't want to go looking up various things about it right now, but.

            When the 'sex trafficking' discussions are going on, I do tend to bring up rape - because there is no 'sex' with trafficked people, since consent requires no threat or coersion or force. And trafficked people face all or most of those.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • copacetic@social.tchncs.deC copacetic@social.tchncs.de

              @noodlemaz @andrewstroehlein To me "child porn" sounds worse than a four letter acronym like "CSAM" and four full words is too long.

              noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
              noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
              noodlemaz@mstdn.games
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #30

              @copacetic @andrewstroehlein my point is it is not 'porn'. Pornography is adult-produced media for adults. The second anyone involves children it stops being porn and becomes criminal abuse.

              CSAM is two syllables. It is widely used. I'd say, do better.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • andrewstroehlein@mastodon.socialA andrewstroehlein@mastodon.social

                "Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"

                That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.

                nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nilz@norden.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #31

                Hallo @Bundesregierung ,
                warum postet ihr noch auf einer deepfake Kinderporno Plattform?"

                // @andrewstroehlein

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • scaletheory@mastodon.socialS scaletheory@mastodon.social

                  @andrewstroehlein

                  Which site? Got more info on this?

                  More and more we can't believe a word about anything since pizza gate, which smells like Minnesota daycare bullshit.

                  noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                  noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                  noodlemaz@mstdn.games
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #32

                  @SCALETHEORY X, and you can find articles about the abuse images with Grok and commentary with ease if you have a quick look. Men are prompting it thousands of times in just minutes, directing it to unclothe women, children and babies.

                  (apols, your reply wasn't showing at the time)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.hostW wyatt_h_knott@vermont.masto.host

                    @andrewstroehlein Nope. "Why is any government on ANY private site?" is the question.

                    utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                    utf_7@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                    utf_7@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #33

                    @Wyatt_H_Knott @andrewstroehlein to be fair, to reach the younger generations

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tofu@is-a.catT tofu@is-a.cat

                      @andrewstroehlein *formerly, my brain is cooked right meow

                      ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                      ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                      ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #34

                      @tofu @andrewstroehlein Actually, formerly and formally both fit.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper