@evan
> LLMs are great at a lot of things that computers haven't done well previously.

I hear this claim a lot, but it's never substantiated verifiably.

In fields where I understand the LLM output, it is unreliable plagiarism or unreliable garbage.

In fields where I need to rely on others more knowledgeable, those who *aren't incentivised to hype the LLM* report LLMs are unreliable plagiarism or unreliable garbage.

They're okay at language patterns. What are you saying they're great at?

I haven't a clue @evan.

What I am confident of, is that none of today's #AIBubble technology comes anywhere close, nor is it even pointed in the right direction.

Very important.

But determining *what is* the Right Name for something? That's not easy.

@evan