@DemonHouser If an AI system inadvertently blocks a critical system in my world, really bad things can happen. And if they do, who is accountable? A human making a human mistake is held accountable. An AI system making a "mistake" is just "lol, whoops, it's still learning" and no one is held accountable.

Also, I dislike how now that modern AI has been proven to be hot garbage people are using traditional ML as a counterpoint. They are not the same despite the overlap in their usage.

@nyanbinary Tippy top. Highest risk to the org.

@loke Attackers only need to succeed once for initial access but defenders only need to be right once to mitigate after initial access. Those cute little bugs being found by the multi billion dollar AI systems do not imply any legitimate offensive capabilities.

@alerikaisattera Is there another term for people using AI if they aren't required to?

@kirby It may be common on fedi but it certainly isn't common in my experience in industry. I'm surrounded by AI-enabled attacker pearl clutchers and tech bros promising to save the world with their AI SOC magic beans.

@beyondmachines1 AI tools used by attackers has not materially impacted capabilities beyond scope and scale, but that does not change the likelihood of occurrence or the severity of impact to orgs who were already modeling their risk based on the state of the art threats, which should be everyone at this point. Defenders relying on nondeterministic and unaccountable systems are inevitable going to miss things due to the way existing AI tools work.

@bakachu Maybe. It depends on the org's reliance on said third parties.

@tuban_muzuru Indeed. But given the fact that I'm not familiar with your thoughts on the matter, there is a good chance that you and I disagree on which people are the greatest risk.

@Pineywoozle @ajn142 IDK, there's a difference between attacking the sharks and simply swimming in the huge ocean. I feel bad for shark bites in most cases. But I also don't blame the sharks.

@ajn142 My take:

https://infosec.exchange/@cR0w/116443828877658238

@badsamurai You're right! Now I'm even less sympathetic, somehow.

@badsamurai 🫍

RE: https://flipboard.com/@themirror/the-mirror-sl5qf4b2z/-/a-B5jPPrhfQF65kR0D0kTx_g%3Aa%3A1643597903-%2F0

hashtag team elephant

@tarix29 My doctor also said I was deficient in the D but thanks to his help, I am now getting plenty of D to make up for it.

@stroz Getting the D outside? Where others can watch? Bold.

In case you needed an excuse for more D

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/vitamin-d-levels-dementia-risk_l_69d6bf15e4b00247ba993476

@ajn142 @Quasit Compared to the other bad options or in general? Or blink twice if this was a missed distress signal.

@Taco_lad @fishidwardrobe ^cursed

@fishidwardrobe Technically, yes. But practically, no.