@theeclecticdyslexic@mstdn.social @kauer@aus.social @blogdiva@mastodon.social I wouldn’t say it necessarily gives less power to google but rather returns more to you, but I’m being pedantic
etsyy@mastodon.catgirl.cloud
Indlæg
-
“PIRATING” IS A CAPITALIST FRAME -
“PIRATING” IS A CAPITALIST FRAME@kauer@aus.social @blogdiva@mastodon.social I’m not advocating for nobody to purchase digital assets or pay the creators, simply that there isn’t a world where the piracy of those assets is wrong
-
“PIRATING” IS A CAPITALIST FRAME@kauer@aus.social @blogdiva@mastodon.social somebody bought it to then have it pirated
-
“PIRATING” IS A CAPITALIST FRAME@Epic_Null@infosec.exchange @blogdiva@mastodon.social I understand, and I’m saying if there’s no material harm in us not upholding our end (that being non-piracy) then we shouldn’t be expected to regardless of if they hold up theirs or not.
I’m saying the contract was invalid to begin with
-
“PIRATING” IS A CAPITALIST FRAME@blogdiva@mastodon.social the moment you make a statement like “if buying isn’t ownership…” you are implying that there is a world where piracy could be wrong or immoral. digital assets can be freely duplicated therefore they can’t be stolen, don’t give any concessions
-
“PIRATING” IS A CAPITALIST FRAME@blogdiva@mastodon.social this is funny and cute but I’m ngl it’s probably the weakest argument for pirating I’ve seen lmao.