@evan xitter not working that way was also the source of some easy social faux pas if you so much as forgot that one of the people in a thread had their account locked while you were looking at an individual post (in which case in practice you should stay out of it)
flippac@types.pl
@flippac@types.pl
Indlæg
-
If Alice makes a followers-only post, and Bob replies to it, to whom should Bob's reply be visible? -
If Alice makes a followers-only post, and Bob replies to it, to whom should Bob's reply be visible?@evan ("private" here being the DM analogue, ofc)
-
If Alice makes a followers-only post, and Bob replies to it, to whom should Bob's reply be visible?@evan yeah, but we actually have an opportunity to have at least one mode work that way whereas the current effect of "followers only" is for everybody to have to ask themselves if someone is following them who shouldn't be party to the conversation
-
If Alice makes a followers-only post, and Bob replies to it, to whom should Bob's reply be visible?@evan this is what happens when people want to have a moderately private conversation, yeah: think of it like the pub/bar/café table filling up for a given subthread
-
If Alice makes a followers-only post, and Bob replies to it, to whom should Bob's reply be visible? -
If Alice makes a followers-only post, and Bob replies to it, to whom should Bob's reply be visible?@evan those following both Alice and Bob