@evan Oh! Sorry, I thought that was like, an example of what you were thinking about in the conversation ij general. I didn't realize you meant it as example-of-existing-usage, my bad.
gaditb@icosahedron.website
Indlæg
-
When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be? -
When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be?@evan I know I mean, functionally.
If I draw something that's a map of Ellenville and label it Springfield it still works as a map of Ellenville.
(And like, it's a (maybe, I assume) map of the developer communities/social landscape around the software construction /of Fediverse software in particular/, so arguably that's not an inaccurate label on it...)
-
When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be?@evan But, probably for what I think you want this for, it should 100% be instance.
Again being a parody of myself, but with acknowledgements to Virginia Shea (1995):
> "The ActivityPub Matrix" refers to all the computers in the world that can exchange JSON-LD Objects.
> "The Fediverse" means almost the same thing. It's sort of a psychic superset of the ActivityPub Matrix -- it's the psychic space in which people interact when they communicate via ActivityPub. "Cyberspace" and "the Fediverse" are used synonymously in this book. -
When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be?@evan I think that's a map of the development ecosystem and of developer communities/the social construction of software,
so not nothing but very distinct from what making Instances nodes would be a map of.
-
When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be?@evan
I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean by "software", but potentially "Everything but Topics".
There probably shouldn't be Only One Diagram.