@argv_minus_one @worik
The creation of code was never the bottleneck anyway

https://debuggingleadership.com/blog/if-you-thought-the-speed-of-writing-code-was-your-problem-you-have-bigger-problems

@grvsmth @wobweger @moskitokoenig

@worik
https://deadsimpletech.com/blog/no-such-thing-as-just-a-tool
By @iris_meredith
https://tante.cc/2026/04/21/ai-as-a-fascist-artifact/
By @tante

Somewhere in this discussion drug dealers get mentioned.
All of the people trying to convince me to use AI sound like addicts trying to sell me drugs so they can justify their own (mis-) use.
And I *hate* drugs of any kind.

@argv_minus_one @grvsmth @wobweger @moskitokoenig

@worik @argv_minus_one @wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig I have to read and review the code right today.
And it sucks.
It reuses old fashioned paradigms, because the old shit is more prevalent in the training data.
AND the users of those LLMs all start to become lazy and just believe what hallucinations the machine dishes them.
Code quality was terrible before, it will only go down now.

@worik @argv_minus_one @wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig not if we burn down every fucking fascist data center.
And no, people using LLMs are deteriorating in their skills so fast, overall code quality (which was shit anyway to begin with) will only go down.

@worik @argv_minus_one @wobweger @libreoffice @grvsmth @moskitokoenig

How can the: "here is the stochastic average of the training data" be of better quality?
That is not how LLMs work.

The code quality is shit, especially without rigorous human supervision.