@loriemerson @lxo it is not actual for many years already. the era of possible cheap development based on existing technologies is over and further envolvement takes serious scientific research and engineering efforts and investments.
that's why we don't see any improvements in hardware the past decades. they just faced the limits that are not passable with already exising solutions.

@loriemerson I disagree only with °cheaper° clause. because if something is better and higher in tehnology, it just cannot be cheaper. and cheaper are usually poor quality things or things made by slaves that are underpaid.
but I would add a clause of longevity: a new instrument should run and work fine longer than previous one.

@GrapheneOS @lxo
looks llike Brasilian government requirements to software are much worse than we expected.
this is not just a breaking privacy for some third-party service, it's deanonimizing and tracking users by whatever sites and servers in an unknown circle.

@GrapheneOS >Complying would require integrating a mandatory process for each user where a third party service checks government identification and confirms a match using the camera.
that's sick. this is the absolute break of any privacy and this should be avoided by all software developers.