@metin there it is:

@metin Haha, true. Maybe a split violin plot is in there somewhere. That would be the visual I'm interested now.

@metin fascinating, but the chart prompts so many questions for me.

Why are there below average genAI homeworks at all?

Is it valid to compare exam scores from the high scoring homework groups this way? Aren't there presumably a lot of bad students hidden in the lower right red line? Or in other words: shouldn't we expect a reordering of true performance in the genAI group?

The more interesting takeaway is the consistent outperforming from non-AI using students. Or is that the main message? The chart sets a different focus with the way it is presented.